Bum-i-fornia: Jews Created the “Professionally Homeless” Problem in America
Posted by Socrates in California, counterculture, homeless, jewed culture, jewed language, Socrates, vagrancy laws at 1:29 pm | 
Permanent Link
About 95% of the “homeless people” in America are “professionally homeless.” They’ve been homeless for 20 years, moving back and forth between a dozen “homeless shelters” getting free food, panhandling daily and drinking wine for breakfast and vodka for lunch (or maybe shooting meth). Sometimes they assault people who don’t give them enough money. Yes, they could get jobs, but why would they want to?
Why are there so many “professionally homeless” people around? Here’s a big reason: Using their domination of the media and Hollywood, Jews created and glorified the 1960s counterculture, which led directly to America’s current “permissive” society. Vagrancy laws? America doesn’t enforce those laws anymore — they’re too “Nazi-like” [1]. We won’t tolerate Nazism! Even the words have been changed by the Jewish media: the “homeless” used to be called “bums” or “transients.” But “homeless” sounds so much better, doesn’t it?
[1] “vagrancy refers to the offense of persons who are without visible means of support or domicile while able to work”
29 April, 2019 at 3:02 pm
Let’s get the real history book out and put the fake one back on the shelf.
All the race mixing, homelessness and nigger music burst on the scene in the 2d half of the 1980s. It is the generation that is everything it places on another.
First. There wasn’t a homeless problem in the 1960s or ’70s.
Second. There wasn’t a race mixing problem in the 1960s or ’70s.
Third. Who was the counterculture?
Let me then tell you. Racists teenage Boomers in the South were the counterculture. Nonconformists who denounced the establishment as corrupt and intrusive were the counterculture. And they’re still right.
A significant portion of soldiers that returned home from Vietnam became nonconformist after realizing the war was a fraud.
The 1960s unleashed a tidal wave of White people and White music. White youth of the 1960s stayed White.
Nonconformists were at large in the 2d half of the 1960s. The Jews managed nothing.
29 April, 2019 at 3:35 pm
Maybe in the Deep South some of the “hippies” were racist Whites, but everywhere else they were race-mixing, leftist Whites, led by the Jewish counterculture, who went around giving the Marxist salute and praising the Black Panthers and the SDS. Just a few years later those same hippies were grooving to ridiculous songs like “My Woman From Tokyo” by the so-called White rock group Deep Purple. Believe it or not, I have studied 1960s counterculture. In fact, it’s a miracle that America survived the 1960s. In many ways, it didn’t. If you have happy memories about the 1960s, great. But for most people the outcome of the 1960s was terrible, the worst imaginable.
29 April, 2019 at 4:20 pm
Further reading: Jews and the New Left (post-1965)
http://mailstar.net/macdonald.html
https://vdare.com/articles/memories-of-madison-my-life-in-the-new-left
https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2017/09/14/ted-gold-and-the-jews-of-weatherman-part-1/
https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2017/11/15/a-forgotten-revolutionary-john-jacobs-founder-of-weatherman/
29 April, 2019 at 4:30 pm
We agree to disagree. Your literature is hyperbole.
As I have said, race mixing in the 1960s was nil. Hippies had no more of a reputation for race mixing than all the other Boomers. The pictures of Woodstock are easily over 90% White. Woodstock continues to be the largest White music venue in history. All pictures of hippie gatherings are over 90% White.
The ol’ peace culture had no doctrine and no mission. To let alone. “Don’t push your trip on me, and I won’t push mine on you.” Jews had no control over the so called counterculture because there was nothing to control.
When Boomers were coming home 100 a week in body bags, the nonconformists crowded the funeral homes to honor the dead — their generation.
So what’s going on with the nonstop White-nigger generations, nigger music, and the Jews who have controlled them the last 20 to 25 years.
29 April, 2019 at 5:16 pm
The 1960s is about the Vietnam war and the reinvasion of the South by Federal troops. That was the catalyst. The nonconformists made a lot of noise, but they were going to jail because they were White.
The first half of the 1960s was a continuation of the 1950s.
29 April, 2019 at 6:58 pm
Correction — Nonconformists were not going to jail because they were White.
30 April, 2019 at 12:13 pm
The plastic universities cannot give you blood based knowledge.
Back in the day, professional essayist like Macdonald would be horrified to witness hippies, rednecks, bikers, cowboys and business men listening to the same music, drink from the same bottle and pass the same joint — down in Texas. The folk stayed together. We didn’t turn on each other because of different stereotypes. Big brother is a rodeo cowboy, little sister is a hippie and cousin dozen is a biker. Is this a production mistake? I don’t see any Jews.
The folk, the man who experiences culture on the ground level writes with blood. The academia essayist writes sterile sentences. He offers no intimate information.
Texan KRIS KRISTOFFERSON said of the contradiction at the live music capital in Austin — back in the day:
“He’s a Poet, He’s a Picker, He’s a Prophet, He’s a Pusher, He’s a Pilgrim and a Preacher and a Problem when He’s Stoned…
1960s. race mixing and homelessness — nil.
1960s. The Federals destroyed the White establishments in my Section of the forced alliance. The teenagers fought back.
30 April, 2019 at 2:42 pm
fd, I can’t make you see Jews if you don’t want to see them. Maybe you just don’t want to see Saul Alinsky, Abbie Hoffman, Jerry Rubin, Paul Krassner, Ron Radosh, Ira Einhorn, et al. But you can’t “wish them away” like the kid in the Twilight Zone movie. They were there. I can list two dozen top Jews who led or dominated the counterculture movement. If you want to ignore them, then you must have your own reasons for doing so, but I don’t know what they are, though…