31 December, 2016
Arthur Schopenhauer on Women
Posted by Socrates in historical texts, History for newbies, New World Order, NWO, Obama, philosophy, politics, Schopenhauer, Socrates, Trump, Western civilization, Western culture, Western decline, women and 'equality', women voting at 2:44 pm | 
Permanent Link
Schopenhauer basically said that giving women as much freedom as men (e.g., allowing them to vote and hold political office) was a big mistake. And he was right: Bill Clinton and Barack Obama were each elected twice due to the female vote (which, at 55%, is the largest voting bloc in America. Roughly half of all White women voted for Trump, meaning of course that the other half voted for Hillary; ironically, Trump got lucky with the female voters: women are attracted to rich, successful, charismatic, super-alpha-males like him).
1 January, 2017 at 12:47 pm
September 16, 1919.
In a letter to Herr Gemlich, Mr. H. wrote: “The value of an individual is no longer determined by his character or by the significance of his achievements for the community, but solely by the size of his fortune, his wealth. The greatness of a nation is no longer measured by the sum of its moral and spiritual resources, but only by the wealth of its material possessions.”
2 January, 2017 at 12:54 am
A comment on the ‘attraction to wealth and charisma’ idea:
When you see a story of a person who stayed with someone, through thick and thin-like a war veteran drinking through a straw who has no legs-it is usually a woman, refusing to leave her one that she loves.
I saw a news story about a couple, engaged, where the woman was horribly disfigured by a rock to the face that was thrown by niggers through their windshield as they were driving.
She survived, but he did not marry her once she was disfigured for life.
When you say these things of women, it’s a draw to only the negative.
Feminists do this of men, as you well know, and the failure to make the distinction-as to whom you’re referring to-is a real problem.
The smart White women will have no problem doing what they please-they would’ve achieved the vote regardless of Jew agenda to pit the genders against each other.
And of course it could be argued-if the men were better, the Women might be impressed.
Won’t happen if they are constantly referred to as short dudes with tits.
2 January, 2017 at 11:53 am
Emily: today’s women are so “male” that, I swear, I don’t know ONE woman who isn’t a feminist. Not one. All of them work outside the home full time. Most of them “wear the pants” in the family (“family” is used loosely here). All would recoil in horror if you even suggested that women shouldn’t work, or vote. They are not worth marrying, so how they got married in the first place is a mystery (I guess the men wanted “steady pussy”).
2 January, 2017 at 2:31 pm
You nailed it Socrates, especially the closing: “steady pussy.”
The quote I posted earlier by Mr. H., highlights the fact that there are higher objects than money and display.
Edward pollard wrote in his book THE LOST CAUSE: . . . for wherever it has been observed in history that a nation has been willing to surrender liberty in an attempt at territorial ascendancy, it has always been the evidence of a coarse and materialistic character that serves well the ambitious designs of Despotism, and prefers a false greatness to the humbler realities of honour and happiness.”
2 January, 2017 at 5:13 pm
Many of us have heard from their friends the bad experiences they encountered with materialistic White wimmen, the same could be said of White men of course, so it is refreshing to see there are still some fine White ladies such as Emily.