Vanguard News Network

I suspect that Xianity started in Judea around 150 BC (Before Caesar) and spread out to eastern, Greek-speaking parts of the Roman Empire in the late 1st century AD (After Domitian), as a result of the destruction of Jerusalem and its Second Temple. The original Christian controversy was whether or not to convert the Greeks, or just focus on converting fellow Jews in cities like Alexandria, Ephesus and Antioch.

Not enough Jews converted to Christianity, so by the second century Christianity started becoming more Greek and less Jewish in its character. By the third century it had spread to Rome and the West, creating a Latin or Catholic version of the new religion. Xianity was a religion that was popular with the poor, with slaves and with women, three large groups of people who were excluded from Roman society.

But you can read in the Gospels themselves that Christianity, an offshoot of Judaism, was hostile towards mainstream Temple-oriented Judaism from early on. So once Christianity began spreading out into the world the Jews began complaining about it to Roman authorities, telling them it was a religion that not only insulted the Jews but the Roman gods and the divine authority of the Emperor as well. The Christians countered that Christ sacrificed himself for the sins of the world and that he wants everyone to be saved from eternal death and brought to eternal life, something that the Jews are trying to prevent.

And so the back and forth about Christianity being pro or anti Jewish, pro or anti Gentile, has raged ever since. To me it is a Jewish, Oriental messiah cult that is not compatible with Aryan thought. But even if the Jesus story is true then it shouldn’t matter whether one personally believes in it or not. But Xianity leaves a lot of issues unanswered or unresolved, thus giving one the strong impression that it is just another man-made religion or species of related religions.

The Essene cult was a break away Jewish tribe that chose monotheism. And the origins of Christianity is attributed to that particular tribe. The original Judaism had numerous gods which is in line with all the teaming tribes in the Middle East of ancient times.

Noah, Moses, Jesus, and so many others probably never existed. Jewish fables are abundant. There is no contemporary evidence that Jesus existed. Blind obedience is expected of all followers.

Water white Presbyterian and Methodist types don’t want to look to deeply into such a confounded religion that collapses into confusion. As Tim McGreen states above, Christianity is all over the board. The Church of Rome tried to unite the splintered religion by ordering all the scriptures written in Hebrew and Greek edited, sanitized and placed in a book styled the Bible.

Why Does Pope Francis Promote the Hasidic Painting, “The White Crucifixion”? “My take is that, aside from Pope Francis’ love of Judaism and its adherents, which is plainly manifest, which does adequately explain the image in my mind, he’s a revolutionary of a crude, bolshevik type. In overthrowing the old culture, bolsheviks attempt to replace it with something, but they’re at the disadvantage of not having centuries of development and refinement to draw from. They have to throw a replacement together quickly.

This phenomenon is readily observed at many venerable old institutions where the patrons have changed over from old money Europeans to new money Judaic East Europeans. In hurriedly making their mark they impose crude paintings, sculpture and architecture of jarring contrast to the former asthetic. Then, there are fellow tribe members and helpers elsewhere in the establishment (i.e. The New York Times) positioned to authoritatively tell us how ‘talented’ these artists are and how ‘great’ their work is (Chagall was backed by Solomon Guggenheim and Irene Rothschild-Guggenheim).

But beyond aesthetics, “White Crucifixion” is a bolshevik ideological representation of Jesus. It has nothing to do with the real Jesus or Gospel. It depicts a “Jesus” who was crucified solely ‘because he was a Jew,’ just as it is alleged that ‘Jews’ are always persecuted, for no other reason than that ‘they are Jews,’ in other words, “Esau hates Jacob,” the fundamental tenet of the protection racket of rabbinic Judaism.

Chagall may have physically left the ghetto, but he was still preaching the message of the ghetto in his art. This is Chabad Lubavitch Hasidism par excellence.

I believe this is why Pope Francis promotes this image, because it empowers the rabbinic racket by instilling fear in ‘Jews’ and shame in non-‘Jews.'” http://mauricepinay.blogspot.ca/2013/12/why-does-pope-francis-promote-hasidic.html

Speaking to ‘average’ Christians I get the impression most of them don’t know much about their religion and harbour many contradictory ideas that have little to do with the moral precepts of the religion. Some of them are superficial and pretty confused people.
But the most pertinent fact that we as outside observers can clearly see is the willing embrace by all denominations, (maybe excluding the Orthodox Church), of equality and social Marxism. You would think the hierarchy of the churches would understand that ‘equality’ doesn’t exist and Marxism, social or otherwise, is hostile to Christianity. I suspect the bishops etc. are not at all stupid, they know the lies of equality and Marxism but they willingly use these as instruments of The New World Order, which is their true religion. Their intention is to brow-beat the ‘hymn singers’ to be obdient footsoldiers in the advance of the NWO.

Hitler said that people who read the bible all their life eventually go crazy. That is best illustrated by the street people and the prison population.

Why would any White person want to follow non-White, egalitarian, jewish objective truth which is Christianity? It really defies logic of a sinful erring White man, when you consider it.

Perhaps, because an honest White man instinctively differentiates between objective truth and falsehood, even if objective truth is non-White, egalitarian and jewish in origin, which what Christianity is.

The original European religion (white paganism) is 5 thousand years older than Christianity. The original Aryan religion dates back to 9 thousand to 15 thousand years ago.

The swastika aka sun wheel is 9 thousand years old.

Healthy White men don’t rear end anything including their wife, and never have such unhealthy desires, so they can not be tempted either. Only the deprived commit such unhealthy acts.

Trolls and whackos are main stream here.

Which is exactly why many pagans embraced Christianity. It was the judaic sexual ethics and concern for family, without the rituals and circumcisions, which attracted them.

I can appreciate that; we must not tread too heavily on Christianity.

Or maybe we should . There is an egalitarian attitude in the New Testament (for the little people), even though the Church itself is very hierarchical. Their book does not lend itself very well to being the voice of God under the scholarship of textural criticism. And when you get down to it, faith in Christ is really faith in one unknown Palestinian. That would be “Mark” since the other writers used his gospel as a template, sometimes copying it word for word, while adding their own material. And “Mark” was NOT an eyewitness.

And if you read Paul first, you have to think, “Why does he (or “Peter” or “James”) not quote ANYTHING that “Christ” said? Especially in the controversies, such as what foods to eat and circumcision for Gentiles, which were really divisive in the early Church. It is because the gospels were written much later, putting words into the mouth of “Christ.”

So while I hate to side with the Jews on anything, and while their religion is based on legends, I cannot give myself wholly to Christianity, but God knows that I have looked for a way. But it is like holes in the dike—you just keep plugging them up until one day you decide that this dike (that’s “d…i…k….e”, not “d…i….c…k”, for Topkea) needs to be completely replaced.

So sad. But the Great God Pan is NOT dead! He might have to be cleaned up a bit, and given some saltpeter, though.

Christianity is the first religion to convert on the pain of death. The pagans were fired, beheaded, tortured, whatever.

The Tomb of Pan

by Lord Dunsany

“SEEING,” they said, “that old-time Pan is dead, let us now make a tomb for him and a monument, that the dreadful worship of long ago may be remembered and avoided by all.”

So said the people of the enlightened lands. And they built a white and mighty tomb of marble. Slowly it rose under the hands of the builders and longer every evening after sunset it gleamed with rays of the departed sun.

And many mourned for Pan while the builders built; many reviled him. Some called the builders to cease and to weep for Pan and others called them to leave no memorial at all of so infamous a god. But the builders built on steadily.

And one day all was finished, and the tomb stood there like a steep sea-cliff. And Pan was carved thereon with humbled head and the feet of angels pressed upon his neck. And when the tomb was finished the sun had already set, but the afterglow was rosy on the huge bulk of Pan.

And presently all the enlightened people came, and saw the tomb and remembered Pan who was dead, and all deplored him and his wicked age. But a few wept apart because of the death of Pan.

But at evening as he stole out of the forest, and slipped like a shadow softly along the hills, Pan saw the tomb and laughed.

Antagonistes is spot-on about the Gospel of Mark being written first (c. 75 to 80 AD?) and the Gospels of Matthew and Luke being heavily based on the text of Mark. But Mark was not an actual witness to Christ’s ministry……Luke and Matthew supposedly were. So then, why would Matthew and Luke need to base their Gospels on what Mark wrote??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

At any rate the Gospels were obviously not written by anyone who personally knew a “Jesus Christ”. They were written decades after Christ supposedly lived by unknown authors who did not, nor could not have, personally known Jesus or wrote an eyewitness account of his ministry. Good point about the Epistles, too, Ant. Muy bien.

NO, McGreen, let’s discuss it now!

Christianity distorted the natural spiritual evolution of European man. A closed cycle sterile monotheism rooted in philo-Semitism.

Thom, I must say I’m rather surprised at your Catholic point of view when it comes to…to…um, no parking in the rear? What would Doctor Ruth have to say about such Victorian prudery?

I hope your wife eats bookoos of beans, Mate, and blasts your perverted pecker. Serve ya right.
But what would any true psychologicst say about not wanting to look a woman in the face as you make love to her? I think we are getting to the root of the problem here. It is much more serious than I thought.

Gentile Jews are called–little Jews–by god’s elect.

Sgt. Skull Says:
27 December, 2013 at 1:12 pm

Christianity, in its present form, is not conducive to the survival of the white race. Most adherents are Zionist fanatics and can be more belligerent than jews. The non-Zionist xians usually harbor no ill will against non-whites since Gawd would strike them down where they stand for thinking ill thoughts about his non-white, two-legged animals.

And as I’ve said many times, there seems to be several hundred brands of “real” Christianity, so it’s not likely that white nationalists can look to that faith as means to unify the fractured white race in N. America.
Unquote

Exactly correct !

Those who have not studied the Hagee’s, assemblies of Gawd churches, and have not listened and talked to these heretic nut cases just do not understand how really insaned dangerous they are.

Most evanjellyculls I know are radically anti White and look to bait any one who does not love Africans. I knew a couple for ten years, worked with the man, and his “beautiful daughter and son married messtizos! The man was 6-4 and married a stubby from Peru!

They are small minded and unread, they literally believe the Earth is 6000 years old and that the jooos have every right to hate US and we must give all the money they want. Really.

These cultist also grew up in all White towns, but now their children and grand children will be facing a reality they did not.

They do serve in many positions in the regime too, I could name them, but you check it your self.

So White straight men, who are not cultist are out.