Vanguard News Network

Well, this development is a surprise, and I welcome it. Alex, who has initiated this project? Do you know?

I support this blog not as a homily to Pierce, but as a project which can review and re-introduce the reader to the essentials of his writings and analyses.
Over the years, VNN has hosted lively discussions on the merits and legacy of Pierce. Strong feelings have come to surface about the man and his organization, with wide divergence expressed on what worthy lasting contributions can be attributed to them. Most will accept that his intellectual output has been substantial and influential.
This blog need not make the reader ‘like’ Pierce, but it should well inform the reader on his principle works and core ideas.

I find it noteworthy that a blog can be dedicated to him, to one man. Can you recommend another ‘White’ leader that has produced sufficient content with sway to justify starting a blog on?

Please note the Pierce documentary from 1990 entitled ‘Dr. No’ at the bottom of the blog. A strange piece in places. I still don’t know what to make of the tuxedo-clad performers hymn-singing on stage with an NA sign dangling overhead. I think it was meant to mock the Cosmotheist ‘religion’.
The film was made in the very early days of the NA in West Virginia when WLP was trying to form a community on the Cosmotheist-owned property.
The ADL’s Ross comes across as mildly paranoic and extravagant in his claims, certainly trying to frighten the public with the usual lines. When Pierce is recorded in his own words, he comes across as serious and thoughtful. The Sheriff comes across as……..well,….. a system-serving order taker. I bet he was well rehearsed by the ADL in preparation for his interview.

William Gayley Simpson and of course Professor Revilo Oliver both deserve a dedicated blog. A well thumbed copy of W G Simpson’s magisterial ‘Which Way Western Man’ should be on the desk every White Nationalist.

the jew Rappaport is excessively optimistic, which is a very good sign.

Marc Rappaport Says: I’m glad to see there’s so much fighting and mistrust among you Nazi nincompoops. Hopefully there always will be!

I’m not a Nazi. A Nazi is someone who refers to himself as a “national socialist.” I don’t refer to myself as such.

For want of a better, more accurate association, I do claim to be a National Socialist. Not in all details, of course, but in the general, it’s accurate.
What better or more precise political/philosophical label is there to hang one’s hat on? I’d like feedback on that question.

What ‘brand’ of politics or world-view do you lump yourself in with? And please, no custom made names or ephemeral constructs to answer this. Answer with something that has had an historical presence and viability.

Well, once again, the VNN comment shredder -‘the filter’- has detained two posts of mine and bail has not yet been set. What’s the price, Alex?

If not National Socialist, Socrates, then with what do you identify yourself with?

Not a NS, socrates? Then what do you tell people you are?

Torrence, are you saying that only fee-paying, card-carrying members of a recognized NS organization have the right to be called pro-White? What about racially conscious Whites who are apolitical, or who are not the type to join any clubs? What about racially conscious Whites who just don’t like the idea of marching around in brown uniforms with swazi flags and armbands? Is there no other way for Whites to express or promote their racial beliefs except through NS pageantry?

torrence, I usually describe myself as a White nationalist, plain and simple. As to exact ideology, Dr. Pierce’s brand comes the closest to describing my ideology, although there may be a few differences between his and mine. Pierce had the greatest influence on my thinking.

Thanks Alex. I may try to spell my name differently, but surely that can’t be the reason for the block. Some posts do go through. If the same one word was causing the arrest of some of my posts, the filter would consistently deny all submissions containing that one word; so I reason.

“For the record, I’m not Alex.”
Sorry, then. I appreciate the correction.

Rappaport raises a good point about mistrust and infighting among WNs. In fact, I ought to write a post about it. Indeed, out of 10 WNs, only 5 are on the same page. Some are Christian, some are NS, some are CI, some are Klan, and few seem to agree on many things other than the basic points, like “Blacks are big trouble.”

Good article by Roper. And so true. Whites have always been human and have always acted human with all their foibles and flaws.

I feel ambivalent about posting on the internet. I think somebody has to say the things that I say, for example, to give an older White woman’s perspective on all of this. But the more you post, the more you set yourself up for flame wars and insults, etc. I try to keep my comments on VNN forum to a minimum and more serious these days.

I was reading what another White guy (with whom I have had several phone conversations) who occasionally posts on VNN but usually is found on the Phora said about other White Nationalists. He said he had stopped going to their local meetings because he just didn’t like them. This is what worries me: that we really don’t like each other very much when we are supposedly fighting for (or at least wanting) the same thing.

If I met you all in person, would I find you likable? Who knows? Would I find your personalities just as annoying, just as irritating, as other non pro White people? Probably. Would I be able to overlook this feeling as selfishness and get beyond this in order to advance the White agenda. I sure hope so.

At some point, if we ever want to try to do anything in this country, to come together as a race of people, standing together as Whites, we are going to have to learn that each of us is an individual underneath the skin color. We can fight together as Whites, but we must be able to learn to accept each other for whatever each of us is individually and not let that separate and destroy us.

That will be the big test for Whites as we advance into the New World Order.

With an interesting post in that blog. 1976.

“Why don’t all the pro-White organizations unite?”

A union would be dangerous, but at least all (real) pro-whites should respect and help each other.