Alex on British-vs.-German Style
Posted by Socrates in Alex Linder, Britain, British vs. German style, England, Germany, Socrates, White philosophy at 2:12 pm | Permanent Link
[…]
“It’s a gross generalization, but the British style is obsessed with how one looks to others – the seeming – the German style is concerned with the interior, the quality, the BEING. This is what makes German culture superior to British culture in pretty much any field you care to look at, but just in society generally. AmeriKwa, of course, is a judeo-British product – a vile jew-communist head vivisected onto a genial but not overly intelligent British colonial mutt.”
13 March, 2011 at 3:20 pm
Alex is right about Aldi and why we should shop in Aryan owned stores that keep things minimalist so that a low as possible percentage of our food dollar gets syphoned off as taxes to sustain zog.
However, in the jewK Aldi seems to locate its stores in low rent areas on the edge of mudsville and as a result the shops are full of muds. I dislike mixing with them and seeing mongrel kids running wild in the produce aisles so I don’t shop there.
13 March, 2011 at 6:26 pm
AmeriKwa, of course, is a judeo-British product – a vile jew-communist head vivisected onto a genial but not overly intelligent British colonial mutt.”
America got the religious fanatics and Australia got the criminals, I think America got the worst of the lot.
Every scientific and technological invention had its preview, in Europe, absolutely nothing has ever been conceived in the United State unless its Henry Fords assembly line, that’s what makes America such a great land for herds and herd think, and a great place for introducing new technology without the obstacles you would face in Europe . Now Amerikwa is becoming a dump, for turd world immigrunts ruminating to be free, and at the same time that ole timey religion has convinced the judae-xtians that itz time to exit the planet.
America has never had anything but third rate intellects, no not oppressed by inquisitions, but flattened by Fat Boy Amerikwa .
The only cure for the Kwa, is to do what Confucius said “change the language.”
13 March, 2011 at 6:42 pm
Who helped America acheive its independance from Johnny Bull, more than the French monarchy? Who sent America military advisors , army and navy contingents to hold England at bay. Who sent America chemists, artisans, statue of Liberty. What thank did they get for all that? Stink is what they got, they refused to aid Whites in Haiti against Niggers hordes, they assisted England almost openly. even after the limeys burnt down DC. And then when England was just about shut down by German u-boats, in comes ole yankee doodle dandy the noodle head. What kind of allies did Johnny Bull make? The Russians found that one out, When their fleet sailed 18000 miles to the Far East. the British wouldn’t even allow them to re-coal at British installation in Africa or along the route.
13 March, 2011 at 7:07 pm
Its time for an American invasion of England, clean out that cesspoole, stuff all the ragheads and mudslims down the chimey pipes, dig up Cromwells, and Winstons graves and drag their asses down a cobble stone street, and then leave them to the tower ravens to devour. Shut the ole hag and royals up in some barren rock fortress Then for the remaining bunch deportation to Tasmania.
How do you like us coming back into the kingdom this way, Johnny Bull?
13 March, 2011 at 7:15 pm
Aside from linguistics, can the historical cultural difference between “Celt” and “Germanic” be defined?
For example, a recent VOR broadcast featured a lecture by an Odinist of English descent. He claimed that the British Isles were already populated by Germanic people even before the Angles and the Saxons invaded. Therefore, in his opinion, the idea of an originally majority Celtic Britain is a myth. He discussed the similarity in myths to bolster his claim.
Not really sure if British are more or less “esse quam videri” than Germans. But among German-Americans vs. Americans of British or Irish descent, my opinion is that there is no difference at all.
There’s a real sadness to the idea of seeming rather than being. Go to a typical mall. The other day at Crate & Barrell, they were displaying these beautiful antique-looking tables which were supposed to look just like the old table that your family has supposedly owned for 100 years that sits in your farmhouse kitchen in Provence.
Then, the clothing too suggests untruths about the wearer. The tee shirt has some fake exclusive sports club name, or it comes artistically faded to suggest that the wearer played soccer all summer long wearing the garment regularly.
A women’s clothing store had pants on display and sign saying “to bring out your inner Hepburn” with photo of a model dressed like Kathryn Hepburn in Philadelphia Story, a film in which Kathryn Hepburn played a wealthy socialite named Tracy. Would today’s young women be as amused as Tracy’s giddy younger sister at the suggestion that Tracy’s ex “socked” her in the face? That bizarre scene always haunted me: in reality, a normal teenage girl would be upset by such an incident, if not emotionally scarred for life. And, Tracy would have lost several teeth.
What the merchandise seems to be suggests what people truly want: The “antique” table suggests roots and permanence, a continuance of family and tradition; the tees suggest leisure and comradery; the Hepburn model suggests glamor, wealth & possibly also family and roots. Lately women’s fashion throws back to Audrey Hepburn and Jackie Kennedy; perhaps just a longing for a more stable and prosperous time?
Of course, the industry would argue that there is nothing wrong with fantasy. What harm does it cause if the wealthy decorate their kitchen to recall their vacation on the Rivera? Is it not just an entertainment? The only harm is if they forget their real needs, and lose themselves in a consumerist fog.
13 March, 2011 at 7:16 pm
Sometimes I have to buy gas at the kwikie-mart at 2am and I notice the poor kid behind the counter is totally vulnerable to any piece of shit who wants to hold the place up and kill him. It’s a dangerous job and certainly not worth the 8 or 9 bucks an hour he’s getting paid. Of course the kwikie-mart management isn’t going to invest a few hundred bucks to install a protective glass for the safety of the 9$ an hour employee. Being a cab driver is also very dangerous but since most cabbies these days are 3rd world invaders I don’t care what happens to them.
Yet we’re supposed to cry our eyes out whenever some cop is shot, even though it’s statistically not as dangerous as the two jobs mentioned above and he’s getting paid 35-55K a year. If the cop is shot or injured he has full medical insurance and if he dies his family gets police union benefits for life. If the kid (or the adult unfortunate enough to have a crappy job like that) behind the counter at the kwikie-mart gets injured or is shot and killed, neither he nor his family get squat.
And it’s true about those wogs and their control of the motel business. Last summer I was in northern NH, which is still overwhelmingly White, yet the motel manager was a dot-headed wog bitch. Naturally the TV didn’t work right but she sure as hell wasn’t going to do anything about it. And the rates were way too high. They didn’t even have a soda machine or anything, the cheap wog bastards.
13 March, 2011 at 9:43 pm
Mary O, I’ve noticed a lot of the classier young White women these days regard Audrey “Breakfast at Tiffany’s” Hepburn, Grace Kelly and Marilyn Monroe as their role-models, NOT Lady Ga-Ga or Britney or Angelina, Christina or Beyonce. I wholeheartedly support that trend.
14 March, 2011 at 5:58 am
Sarah, I think it’s safe to say that your above post, as brilliant and charming as it is, will soon get buried under an avalanche of a dozen or more thumbs-down. It will never see the light of day again. And by gum, that’s how it should be.
14 March, 2011 at 2:27 pm
Bristish style is obsessed with looking acceptable to others, and Germans don’t care. Perhaps that is why you see this in Germany, in public parks:
http://www.edenism.com/world-nude-beach-guide/europe/images/germany_munich_englisher_5.jpg
Would you not think that they would have a shred of modesty, or care just a little (about a bikini’s worth) about what others think about them?
If they want to go to a nude beach, fine but this is a public park!
But maybe Germans don’t care–maybe they go au naturale to their gray, dim, grainy, seedy stores?
14 March, 2011 at 5:58 pm
ANt, I might agree with you for one reason–niggers and moslems, or nigglems.
Nigglems go berserk when they see naked women especially whtie women.
Get rid of nigglems, fat women, ugly women, and women could subathe in the nude with no problem with no fear of rape or some nigger queering off on them.
,
14 March, 2011 at 6:45 pm
Thom, there are still quite a few Whites who are at the lower end of the spectrum of morality, or intelligence, or whatever it is that keeps them from committing rape or “queering off” on a female.
But maybe these German gals were policewomen, or something, setting up an entrapment? What dedication!
But, policewomen of America, spare me such sights of dedication!
14 March, 2011 at 7:57 pm
If were going to turn our back on Europe, well lets do it completely, no more interceding in wars in the Eastern Hemisphere, hell lets make England a colony, first get rid of the kikes and other muds, sell the crown jewels, and ship the hag and royals off to Monaco. Why will even name our empire Oceania in commemoration of Lord Orwells superb novel. Allow Continental Europe to become a nude paradise, we’ll breed themlike livestock ala Eloi , give them lots of sauerbraten, and bier.
14 March, 2011 at 9:36 pm
The British have always hated the Germans because the Germans are better than them. It is called jealousy.
14 March, 2011 at 11:30 pm
To Antagonistes who said:
Bristish style is obsessed with looking acceptable to others, and Germans don’t care. Perhaps that is why you see this in Germany, in public parks …
But the other Germans don’t find their nudity unacceptable; those two women are showing off their slenderness, fitness and natural grace to the approval of the on-lookers. Despite the nudity, they project modesty.
Also, self-confidence, and a great deal of trust.
14 March, 2011 at 11:31 pm
But the Germans and English are both of Germanic origin. The Fuhrer himself realized that. True, there are some English upper-class types who are of Norman ancestry, but that’s great too because Normans were simply a more refined type of Norsemen. Therefore I do not understand this alleged dichotomy between the Germans and English.
And as far as public nudity is concerned there are lots of English who are into that streaking thing too. But I wonder how bold those White girls would be if they were in a colored neighborhood or were surrounded by uncivilized colored savages instead of passive and permissive White people?? My guess is that they’d keep their clothes on, which, considering the appearance of many of those nude specimens, is just as well.
14 March, 2011 at 11:50 pm
The hardest thing for American White Nationalists to accept is that Anglo-American culture may be part of the problem.
To fight our fight we would do better, perhaps, being French and German rather than English and American.
Céline and Jünger for example.
14 March, 2011 at 11:58 pm
To Tim McGreen who said:
But the Germans and English are both of Germanic origin. The Fuhrer himself realized that. True, there are some English upper-class types who are of Norman ancestry, but that’s great too because Normans were simply a more refined type of Norsemen. Therefore I do not understand this alleged dichotomy between the Germans and English.
Even if we assume that the Celts were entirely “non-Germanic,” the Celts never hated Germany. Ireland was neutral in WW2.
The other groups which comprise the genetic make-up of the British Isles & Ireland are all considered Germanic: Angles, Saxons, Danes, Vikings …
15 March, 2011 at 12:21 am
It amazes me, that British explorers in Africa (Livingstone, Stanley, Jephson etc) in the 19th century were quite used to meet niggers completely naked and were neither surprised nor embarrassed.
Does clothing effect such a change in behavior, that a naked person today is regarded as somewhat deranged? And– why do just mud races react in a distasteful way?
15 March, 2011 at 12:54 am
To Arminius who said:
The attitude that nudity is wrong is a reaction to aggressive or violent behavior. Clothing symbolizes armor and social status. A naked man conceals no weapons. A naked woman is also vulnerable. People do not undress in Central Park (for example) because they would be too scared — unless they are deranged.
Was British society more violent than German society? Was there any German version of Oliver Twist?
15 March, 2011 at 5:53 am
Nudity, as in the case of the girls in the Munich park, is acceptable so long as it doesn’t venture into exhibitionism. The girls seem to be following the norms of Aryan dignity so it’s ok.
It is interesting to compare British and French sculpture, particularly 19th century stuff, with German sculpture of the same and later period. British works seem to emphasize the passive and erotic aspects of the female form whereas in Germany similar works are imbued with a quiet heroic dignity. The full flowering of this trend is evident in Arno Breker’s work where all the nude figures, both male and female, even the contemplative studies, reflect a joyous activity that is the essence of Aryan life. I’m no expert, just a layman’s observation.
But one thing is certain, ‘British’ art is jewed and degenerate.
15 March, 2011 at 8:44 am
Everything is adorned with something, trees are very ugly if they don’t have leaves, and who would like hairless dogs or cats?
Sometimes too much adornment is not good, as in the case of some Messican acrobats I saw once on TV who were completely coated with hair like some skye terriers, you couldn’t even make out the eyes., eee gawds what would they have looked like when they turned gray! Of course the jews would say they were part of the human race, and Xtians would chime in that they were being punished for their sins by looking like monkeys.
Language has been a great barrier among Europeans, most peoples definition of foreigner is a person with an accent. Look how a simian like Whoopee Or Oprah can ape any White person, and pass them selves off as humans.
15 March, 2011 at 8:58 am
British society more violent? Not hardly, in fact other than those soccer fans, Most British are the epitome of politeness, queing in lines, letting themselves be flattened by muds, giving up an empire because thats what jesus would to etc… The worst of the bunch are the Dutch crowds, I think they’d trample over their own grandmothers, but its incredible how they’ll fall down and worship muds even though they’re bigger than them, they have this cowardliness, what do they call it Dutch courage?
15 March, 2011 at 9:00 am
I do indeed find this much more acceptable than the “look-at-me, ha, ha!” attitude that accompanies public exhibitionism such as streaking, with the accompanying sniggers and titillations from spectators.
I think that both the exhibitionism and the sniggering are connected to a puritan shame, so the “natural grace” of these girls is indeed better.
However . . . I don’t think I would apply the word “modesty” to what they are doing. But it is indeed another culture.
15 March, 2011 at 9:38 am
Personally I don’t like crowds, of muds, crocodiles, or Whites. Don’t stick your butt in my face. I enjoy seeing flocks of birds, and “Skools” of Fish, and Butterflies fluttering around marigolds. Some herds are enjoyable to see, but I don’t like seeing congregations of Beached walruses, or smelling penguin colonies.
There is a place and time for everything, and nudity should be associated with movement, like sports or migrations, not some fat ass sitting in park munching popcorn and guzzling a beer . The most disgusting thing I ever saw was at a Lake in Oklahoma, where six pack billie and joe were neckin’ to the cheers and sneers of a couple of niggers. oh yeah it could have got nasty, but those two just acted like they didn’t have good sense.
15 March, 2011 at 10:12 am
I think they are talking to each other, something like this:
“There it is, Helga–the crucifix that you lost! Now, how do we bend over modestly to pick it up? And how do we get back on our bike?”
15 March, 2011 at 12:14 pm
NdG, I too saw that TV report about those mestizo werewolves. I also once read a story about a Chinaman who had a second face on the side of his head, the remnant of what was supposed to be a twin sibling. Weird, man. The lower races have some really strange genetic defects among their populations. Normally, the only defects one sees among Whites is the mongolism that is associated with Down’s Syndrome.
15 March, 2011 at 2:00 pm
Multiculturalism produces conflict and violence even among White groups; even among different Germanic groups as in historic Britain, and certainly here in the US.
In Dickens’ era, young White Engish blond-haired boys would actually go hungry in the streets, and resort to petty crime just to survive. Did Germany ever have the same level of urban strife?
Maybe Germany had been much more stable, homogenous and mono-cultural for a long period time; therefore, people don’t have to be as defensive towards each other. They probably would not be so tolerant of foreigners undressing in public parks (except designated nude resort areas). The parks in Vienna have a list of “verbotens” a mile long: the visitor is allowed to admire the beautiful flowers and statues, but not sunbathe or play sports or walk the dog.
15 March, 2011 at 2:31 pm
One person said that the British never get excited until they see dead bodies, I don’t know about nude bodies
15 March, 2011 at 4:33 pm
Are there any ethnic German soccer hooligans?
They sure abandoned London in a hurry.
In freshman bio, our class discussed “animal dominance.” Even among creatures like crickets, the group knows who the top cricket is. The phenomenon remains quite mysterious. Pheromones may play a role. What if nonwhites are just dominant over us in the biological sense?
The reason that Black genes (for example) dominate over White genes in a 4:1 ratio is that Black genes pre-existed White genes. Evolution favors the pre-existing traits; since in most cases, the older traits are healthier for the survival of the species.
Could biology also favor individuals who possess these older traits?
Consider how England’s poor were treated in the nineteenth century. Would any modern Englishman dare to treat an immigrant with such contempt? Would they pull an operation similar to the Land Clearances on the immigrants? Would they throw immigrant women and children into workhouses? No, foreign elements get welfare and affirmative action, and every manner of special treatment.
OR maybe we are actually the dominant population, but the laws have been deliberately written to reverse the natural order, to produce terror and further social control.
For example, a White executive who makes even the slightest comment which could be interpreted as disparaging to any nonwhite will be forced to make a public apology, and usually will lose his job and status anyway. Nonwhites, even Obama, are free to say just about anything negative towards Whites and White culture.
And Whites who work in “service economy” jobs are afraid of Black complaints, since their HR department will try to fire them, or at least humiliate them with “sensitivity training,” regardless of their actual innocence, so terrified are corporations of Denny-style lawsuits.
Whites walk on eggshells so as not to offend the invaders.
But are Whites just afraid of the legal and economic structures which enforce diversity or would Whites be shamed for not being nice to nonwhites even without those social structures — for biological reasons unknown?
15 March, 2011 at 5:16 pm
Interesting observations, Mary O. Unfortunately Aryan life has always been cheap in Britain. The scandalous treatment of the rural poor was noticed and commented on by William Cobbitt during his extensive rides through southern England in the 1820’s.
I attribute the inertia and inaction of the White population to their obvious murder and dispossession to be largely due to shocked disbelief. They are still in denial, but at some level of consciousness they know they are being screwed with the rough end of a pineapple but can’t accept that their so-called leaders, political and religious, are at the forefront of this murderous assault. When and if the penny drops all hell will break loose.
15 March, 2011 at 5:17 pm
OMary, white men used to regularly beat nigger ass. White men have been psyched out. Their women don’t believe in them.
German women go around naked in pubic parks. They should only do that for the one man they love. Make him special and give him power.
I used to challenge niggers to armwrsting and beat them and they were bigger than me. I loved to see them try to ignore what just happened.
15 March, 2011 at 6:07 pm
Biological dominance is not easily explained; the stronger or larger or quicker animal is not necessarily the most dominant. We could actually be fighting some unconscious force — our logic and reason vs. some primitive biological order.
Viking chicks probably did that, too. They are just upholding tradition.
Fights are more about will power than strength. Whites are far more persistent in the face of difficulty, and therefore perform better in fights.
15 March, 2011 at 7:00 pm
You’re the will to power and nothing besides-F. Nietzche
White flight is nothing new, the Huns, the Mongols, the Turks, the Mudslims in successive waves pretty much bottled up Europe, long before the modern age. Hell the Goths were living in present day Ukraine when the Huns stuck, White armies marched all the way to India, 2000 years before Alexander.. Present day Europe has no will to power, its a vacuum. Nature hates vacuums, ask David Oreck
15 March, 2011 at 7:10 pm
OR maybe we are actually the dominant population, but the laws have been deliberately written to reverse the natural order, to produce terror and further social control.
Thats a bad word “Dominant”, implies that you want some kind of order in your society and family.. No, no I’d rather be a weak squishy invertebrate, that reproduces by cell division every 50 years at high tide. “Dominant” that be sooo rassist
15 March, 2011 at 7:18 pm
MaryO, I challenge you to a match of arm-wrestling! You must uphold Viking tradition and be naked. Maybe you will defeat me by some unconscious biological force, ha ha ?
15 March, 2011 at 8:21 pm
The male yang energy must nestle safely within the confines of the feminine yin energy. It cannot exist on its own. The female yin can exist on its own, but is incomplete without the male yang.
The eternal darkness of the yin is the background for the temporal but recurring blazing sun of the yang. Out of the eternal feminine nothing (yin) came the big bang, with the explosion of masculine energy (yang) into matter–nebulae, suns, planets. Out of the unformed energy of the yin is made the structured universe of matter, which is the yang. It is basically the same energy, just different manifestations.
That is why the feminine must be the resting place and the energizing source of the masculine. The masculine is a going-forth, a questing, of the yin; and , as such, on the physical plane, the masculine yang is a temporal and out-going manifestation of the yin.
In the same way, all fetuses are feminine for about the first six weeks. Then, a fetus receives a signal to become a male–the feminine is subtly transformed into the masculine; but the feminine is the baseline, the default model. All the parts and chemicals are the same, just given a different manifestation.
Even though all the great chefs, the great artists, the great inventors, the great writers have been men—there is reason. The reason is this: The masculine energy is the feminine energy turned outward and questing, instead of inward and resting. But that outward-goingness must rest on a solid foundation of the feminine. Masculine energy cannot exist on its own.
That is why a woman MUST devote herself to a man–her body is for him only; her sex is for him only; her devotion is to him only. A woman who is communal, who lets others see her private parts, who sleeps around, who cannot commit to her one and only–such a woman is incomplete, and is not fulfilling her dharma, which is to empower, honor, and bring into fulfillment the masculine.
This is the ancient tradition, the eternal tao.
It is also necessary for the male to recognize from whence comes his strength, his solace, and to honor that source.
15 March, 2011 at 10:40 pm
The Beatles told me you were a fraud.
15 March, 2011 at 10:58 pm
19th c. Germany didn’t have the levels of poverty, worker exploitation and homelessness that Victorian England and even the USA did. Germany was and still is the most socially progressive country in the world. The Jews prospered there like they did no where else, yet those ungrateful vampires helped to destroy the Reich between 1914-18.
16 March, 2011 at 8:20 am
The jews game is always, not sometimes, but always to play both sides against each other , and the middle against both sides. In Medieval times prior to anything called nations, they had the pope and xtian church fighting the Mudslims, they had West Xtians and East Xtians in a religious struggle, while in Spain the jews had opened the doors up to Mudslims from North Afreeka. Along came turks and mongols to swallow up Europe shinking it back to the size of Kansas… In that miserable time , with shylock running around same as always came a religious war to further decimate White ranks, especially in Germany.. Guess what the Germans found out they could settle between themselves which brand of Xtianism they wanted without a conflict. BAD, BAD, BAD FOR JEWS. OH VEY something had to be done to stir up animosity , so the jews all got together for a confab in Zurich and came up with the Protocols while their new brain child Communism which was still on its wobbly legs at the beginning of the 20th century, so they needed a few wars to pit goyim against each other and give time for the next step on the rung, to flood what remained with non-white sewage. Europe today no longer exists,its post-mortem, its reverted back to some sort of effete Yin, nothingness
16 March, 2011 at 8:25 am
An intriguing philosophical explanation, Sri. I think it might be better than the Adam’s rib myth.
I will think about it today.
16 March, 2011 at 8:30 am
Note the interesting commentary between Alex Linder and Hudson,
beginning at post #14, on the Capitalism/Communism question, and
how the ultimate KikeJew problem is lost in their discourse.
4thPos
16 March, 2011 at 8:55 am
The Germans actually developed a strategy that gave working class peope real food to eat, and an education, not like Limey land where children were fed oatmeal and weak tea, oh yeah occasionally at Krismis time you got a tidbit of Cheddar, or a thin slice of some of Dancy dicers, mutton pie smothered in some sort of pasty flour gravey, reminiscent of Winstons fare at Big Brothers diner.
16 March, 2011 at 9:03 am
Why I’ve nevah, nevah heard of anything so preposterous! It simply isn’t Christian to allow the dawgs to eat the crumbs from the masters table. What’ll happen next? Napoleon will invade these sacred isles and introduce some abominable heresy.. Oh dear Miz Piggy please bring me my smelling salts, along with a thin slice of Dancy dicers mutton pie
17 March, 2011 at 12:40 pm
OK, Sri Sreggin, I have allowed my subconscious mind to work upon your posting about male/female yin/yang.
So my question: Given that all you have said is true, would not a BISEXUAL person be the superior life form, according to the Tao, since such a one would incorporate both male and female?
17 March, 2011 at 2:17 pm
Never mind, Holy One.
I think I see the answer.
Or else you sent it to me.
It is like the north and south poles on a magnet–it is the same metal but the ends of it have a different polarity (actually, the magnetic flux flows through the magnet in the same direction, but it enters one pole and exits the other.) If there were to be some sort of bisexual middle magnetic ground, or combination of north and south poles, all power would be lost.
Blessing upon Thee.
7 April, 2011 at 7:53 am
You people are so narrow minded its unreal. You have no sense of excepting any other culture apart from your western supposedly superior views. When in fact its views that inhibit the advancement of the human race. Seriously, how can you even present a valid, logical arguement when from the beginning your language is immersed in emotive racial slang. As for ‘ immigrants’ ruining America, im not even American and i can tell your the reason your country even exists is because its a melting pot. Then you have the nerve to speak about the great ideals of your founding fathers and their escape from Britain and fight for independance when you treat all those that have entered your land in a similar fashion to how the british did and the very reason you broke away. Your such a young country on the world stage and in all honesty you have not even had time to develop efficently. You have some sort of obsession with israel and the jews, your neo-nazis. How you can even push forward the idea that 6 million people dieing is a good thing is beyond me and a complete breach of your christian religous views. You are no different from extreme sectors of any religion believing that their views are the best and right. Clearly you have no idea.
8 April, 2011 at 8:29 pm
You gotta problem with emotive slang?
English, Irish, Scot, Scot-Irish, Germans, French, Norwegians, Swedes, Italians, Russians, Poles and other White ethnicities settled in the US, but despite all the sentimentality, this coming together was not without conflict and tensions.
None of whom envisioned a multiracial empire. General Washington specifically warned against entanglements with powerful foreign entities like Israel, though he was probably concerned about France at the time.
Escape?
We did the fighting.
Unfortunately we don’t treat immigrants that way at all.
The main grievance against Great Britain was taxation without representation. Instead of taxing the immigrants, we pay their rent, full healthcare even for AIDS victims and people needing major organ transplants, free educations for themselves and all of their children, free college, preferential hiring, low-cost small business loans and the right to bring all the rest of their family over to take advantage of our system, too.
WE are ones who pay for all these programs with our sky-high taxes.
They are a tax on us.
Europe and UK were not all that much developed in terms of physical infrastructure and legal and governmental structure before 1600 AD either. Culturally Europe was far advanced over most of the rest of the world, but early Americans shared in that same White culture.
Zionists fund our politicians who desperately need huge financial resources to obtain positive media during campaigns. Beholden to these interests, almost all politicians of both major US parties insist on mindless support for Israel — a hated entity whose interests do not coincide with our own.
We do not want any wars. The war in Iraq created by Wolfowitz and Perle for Israel caused a major 10 year recession from which we are only now seeing a fragile recovery. We are just plain fed up with lay-offs, unemployment, underemployment, foreclosures and the prospect of dire poverty in retirement. That’s why everyone hates Israel so much.
Netan-yahoo on CNN whined that the European Left doesn’t like Israel. Who does like Israel?
If you believe in the murder of 6 mil without one shred of forensics, you are the religious nut, and not us.