Vanguard News Network

The truth is, the conservative bowel-movement was NEVER a good thing for middle-class and working-class Whites. Absolutely never. The conservatives have always been money-worshipping, pro-big business capitalists who were hostile to the White Working Man.

At first, their ranks were comprised of WASPs from wealthy old Eastern familes who came over on the Mayflower. The Jews started infiltrating the ranks of the right-wing establishment in the 1960s and 70s, when a lot of prominent Zionist Jews like Norman Podhoretz, Irving Crystal and David Horowitz became disillusioned with the Left’s hostility towards Zionism (A few former Stalinist Jews began defecting to the Right as early as the 40s). As a result of the Judaization of the Right, a lot of fairies, coloreds, “conservative” feminists and Internationalists have also come on board.

Please, I hope no one here is going to write something like “Well, yes, the Conservatives aren’t everything we’d like them to be, but they are still better than the Liberals. No, no, NO. Both sides are enemies of the White Race, both sides are thoroughly Judaized. We need to be in revolution mode. No more Teabagging, no more third parties, no more political factions. REVOLUTION.

AGREED

Exactly – Tim McGreen summed it up alright: REVOLUTION.

“Conservative”?? “Conserve w-h-a-t?? THIS present jew-created mess??!
Hello no. I’m no “conservative”. I’m a radical, like Ben Franklin and the 56 other angry White Males.

Whites need radical young agitators willing to get their hands dirty, not old fart Conservative sell outs and system whores. Fuck Conservatism!

I agree with Tim. Nothing more to add- he summed it all up perfectly.

No, Coup D’Etat, all those teabagging Glen Beck and Sarah Palin “patriots” are conservatives. They are the direct descendants of the Barry Goldwater and Bill Buckley crowd. They are cowards, reactionaries, compromisers, loudmouths, sellouts, fools, flakes and hypocrites. In other words, they possess all the characteristics of true conservatism.

“The Jews started infiltrating the ranks of the right-wing establishment in the 1960s and 70s, when a lot of prominent Zionist Jews like Norman Podhoretz, Irving Crystal and David Horowitz became disillusioned with the Left’s hostility towards Zionism (A few former Stalinist Jews began defecting to the Right as early as the 40s).” — TimMcG

………………………..

I read quite some years ago (though not that far back) a prediction that the Jews would eventually turn right, given time — or that the Right would become Jewish, either way. The point was that, historically, the Jews have always fawned on the powerful and depended on the rulers to protect them, while they have feared the wrath of the common people whom they exploited. Recent history, in which they have taken a revolutionary role, supposedly being champions of “the people” has been a reversal of this pattern. But it’s not the normal situation. It’s an anomaly.

Most Jews came here from Eastern Europe, in this case fleeing the very rulers who would normally have protected them. After all, they murdered the Czar, so the Czars turned against them. Russian Jews came here in poverty and seething with hatred against the ruling classes. They were against everything that was Establishment. Having nothing, they hated anyone with something. So, of course they were communists. They wanted what was your to be theirs.

But it was predicted that as they gained wealth, and then power, they would turn to the right and eventually become right-wing and even reactionary — which has always been their normal historical position. They would then become The Establishment. Once they are on top, their concern is with keeping what they have, and keeping the masses down. Those “huddled masses yearning to be free” will exist only to be controlled and exploited. By whatever means necessary. No more solidarity and love for “The People”!

An interesting thought, and we see it coming true. Their affectation of being revolutionaries and champions of the people was only a strategy to stir up the masses and weaken the rulers in order to seize control from the ruling class of gentiles (who were at least from the same population) and appropriate it for themselves, making themselves into the new aristocracy.

CON-servatives are utterly worthless and most in the political establishment who identify themselves as such are, in fact, sheeny worshipping neo-cons. Then again that is who pays the bills. They make a lot of noise after seeing which way the wind is blowing but in the end they’ve lost every major battle for Western civilization over the last several decades and I don’t expect that impressive losing steak to end any time soon.

Cons/neo-cons are every bit as reality averse as the libtards. Most conservatives think that if non-whites are forced to say the pledge of allegiance in school, listen to Rush Limbaugh and read a few conservative themed books they’ll become flag waving, patriotic Republicans.

In other words they are blank slates who can be changed by force feeding them conservative political ideology similar to how the Soviet Union “reeducated” disparate groups within their realm with Marxist/Leninist dogma. Further, they think all political and racial problems can be solved by economic policy. This view is pure Marxism and like it or not most conservatives of today are dyed-in the-wool Marxists.

Well said, Jim. The paleocons do make a lot of good points but they dance around the vital issues of race and the Jewish Question as if they were tiptoeing through a minefield. They are always extremely careful not to go “too far”, lest they should get fired from their cushy jobs at FOX News and CNN. And God forbid they should ever be accused of ray-sizim or anti-cementism, two crimes which are apparently worse than killing your own grandma. They will keep denying those charges until they are blue in the face, the scoundrels. Phooey on them.

“No, Coup D’Etat, all those teabagging Glen Beck and Sarah Palin “patriots” are conservatives. They are the direct descendants of the Barry Goldwater and Bill Buckley crowd. They are cowards, reactionaries, compromisers, loudmouths, sellouts, fools, flakes and hypocrites. In other words, they possess all the characteristics of true conservatism.”

Yep. The particular strain of “conservatism” in vogue today goes back to the 1950s and 1960s, 40s even. It’s nothing new.