Vanguard News Network

So it was Jew Gertrude Stein who invented the propaganda word “gay”. No surprise there.

From the second link:

“Miss Furr and Miss Skeene”–referring to Ethel Mars and Maud Squire, respectively–was written between 1909 and 1911, but wasn’t published until 1922 in Geography and Plays. The piece reached the general public as a reprint in the July 1923 issue of Vanity Fair, where it was subtitled “Ladies who were gay together and how one left the other behind.” It was also reprinted in Carl Van Vechten’s Selected Writings of Gertrude Stein (1946). In a work of relatively few words, Stein managed to use the words “gay” and “gayer,” along with (to a lesser extent) “cultivated” and “cultivating,” in almost every sentence.

And the media Jews pick it up and use it over and over until the goyim start parroting it like mindless lemmings.

A kike is a kike is a kike.

I have been giving liberals too much credit lately…Actually, they’re kind of stupid and lazy, even more so, sometimes, than right-wingers. Does the average politically-correct Leftie even know why the word “gay” is used to refer to a homo? Probably not, because liberals don’t like thinking very much. They prefer using cliches and hackneyed phrases, like “turning back the clock”, “same sex marriage”, “global warming”, “a woman’s right to choose” and so on. Liberals are more uptight than Kahnservatives are when it comes to freedom of speech or expression. All those “progressives” are actually advocates for Orwellian Thought Control.

A nose is a nose is a nose.

Jews/Liberals claim to be all for diversity, yet their agenda is actually the opposite and will destroy all diversity by mixing everyone together.

“their agenda is actually the opposite [of diversity] and will destroy all diversity by mixing everyone together.”

Right. If given their way, they will establish uniform mud-ism, everywhere. It will mean the extinction of all differences.
All the while, babbling about “diversity”, of course. They’re total hypocrites.

I mean their Jewish leaders are hypocrites, that is. The obdeient, cud-chewing herd of followers just haven’t taken the trouble to think their ideology all the way through to the end result. Universal mudism!

Hey, my post made it on the frontpage!

Make that “home life”; I guess “homelife” isn’t a word.

“And the Libs are more obsessed with the issue of Race than any Nazi or Klansman ever was.”

Funny thing is, white liberals are far more contemptuous towards non-whites, and hence by their own definition, “racist,” than any White Nationalist who simply wants racial seperation and to stop footing the bill for aid to non-white nations that will never give anything but grief in return. The inferiority of non-whites is implicitly assumed by every liberal who supports affirmative action or who says that the key to helping non-whites is to remove them from their native culture. To say that blacks would be less violent if they were removed from black societies and raised by whites is an admission on the speaker’s part that white culture is superior to black culture.

I can’t for the life of me understand why liberals opposed colonialism, because trying to turn non-whites into white people is exactly what the liberals dream of doing, just as the colonialists tried to do.

Fred Says: “This is the same as the use of the term ghetto to refer to a slum. The word “ghetto” means where the jews … So when someone recounts the horrors of living in the Krakow ghetto the average person gets a mental image of modern american slums.”
………………………………

The mis-use of that word is something that really bugs me. It’s no accident. It came into vogue in the radical 60s; and we can easily guess who made it fashionable because blacks themselves wouldn’t know anything about European ghettos, and most whites wouldn’t either, but Jews certainly would. Jews would be keenly aware of the word “ghetto”. So, radical Jews taught the blacks that they were living in horrible, wretched “ghettos”…. which was not the case at all. It’s a self-serving term for the Jews which kills two birds with one stone: it makes the blacks think they’re victims of cruel gentile oppression, and it allows the Jews to whine about how persecuted they were and to elicit sympathy for themselves at the same time. The word portrayed the Jews and the blacks as suffering together, both victims of white gentile oppression.

But a ghetto is not a slum. It really means nothing of the kind. “Ghetto” was/is originally the name of of an island in Venice which was the district where the Jews settled. As it happens, some Venetian Jews were very rich, and Ghetto was no slum.
http://www.mytravelitaly.com/veneto/venice/ghetto-jewish-district-in-venice/
http://venice.jc-r.net/campi/ghetto.htm

I have seen the ghettos of Prague and Seville, which (I was very interested to note) are considered choice neighborhoods to live in today. Excellent old mansions. Prime real estate. You need money to live there.

Even the Jewish area of Frankfurt, the West End, was the district of villas and mansions. During WW2 it, alone in the city (which was otherwise leveled), was spared from allied bombardment, and many of those old mansions still stand today, converted to luxury hotels and condos, many still owned by the original families. [Question: Weren’t they all supposed to be dead?]

Someday (in Brazil or China or somewhere), the Jews will be wailing to their new hosts about the dreadful old days in America when they were presecuted and were forced to live in the wretched ghettos of Beverly Hills and Miami Beach under unspeakable conditions and terrible poverty.