Vanguard News Network

“a flesh-eating bacteria”?

jews devour the substance & “life-force” of a nation/society, turning its best & most useful human assets into toxic garbage….there-after, the entire nation/society more or less implodes….some-what analogous to “catastrophic organ failure”….the end result of an FEB (?)

(a nice little YT vid’/clip on it all!)

Dwarves amidst elves.

Screw worm

Blood-sucking alien parasite?

A guy goes into a bar, turns one group of friends against another, a man sees what he’s up to and gets a group together to force the guy out. The guy says “HELP, these are the folks who have been trying to murder my family!”, so the groups start fighting the group that tried to stop the source of the fighting. He then robs the register and heads to another bar.

Termites and wood.

Wood remains stuck, trapped, and helpless, while the termites, smarter, mobile, with a sophisticated organization devoted solely to one goal, totally incapable of remorse and totally relentless, destroy the wood from within.

Did I mention the word “Genocide?”

Oh.

The Purpose Of Judaism is The Genocide of the White Race.

We Have A Duty To Our Racial Destiny.

We are not the last of a dying breed; we are the first, and best, of a brave new world.

Take Control Of The Destiny That Is Rightfully Yours.

“a flesh-eating bacteria”?

Not bad. Only thing I see wrong with it is I see jews working more from inside out than outside in.

What I’m looking for here, people, is the most worked-out parallel or analogy, as deep as you can possible take it. Perhaps the best at this was Stephen Whittle, currently in jail, well, as much for his ability to construct animal analogies to jew-human interaction as anything.

The ant thing I believe came from Strom; he was criticized for using it at Pierce’s eulogy, if I recall. But the idea of one group of ants capturing another through deceptive signals is definitely a parallel to our situation.

Some species of ants “farm” aphids, protecting them on the plants they eat, eating the honeydew that the aphids release from the terminations of their alimentary canals. This is a “mutualistic relationship”.
Ant extracting honeydew from an aphid

These “dairying ants” “milk” the aphids by stroking them with their antennae. Therefore, sometimes aphids are called “ant cows”.

Some farming ant species gather and store the aphid eggs in their nests over the winter. In the spring, the ants carry the newly-hatched aphids back to the plants. Some species of dairying ants (such as the European yellow meadow ant, Lasius flavus) manage large “herds” of aphids that feed on roots of plants in the ant colony. Queens that are leaving to start a new colony take an aphid egg to found a new herd of underground aphids in the new colony. These farming ants protect the aphids by fighting off aphid predators.

jews: “Dairying” ants
nonwhites: aphids
Whites: The plant being devoured

entemologist

no such word

Entomologist manques, god dammit.

Parasitism is a common phenomenon in nature. As Eustace Mullins points out in ‘The Biological Jew’, it also occurs in human communities. Such occurrence, as he further comments, receives scarce attention from academics (who seem strangely reluctant to discuss parasitism).

http://www.honestmediatoday.com/ducks_and_hens.htm

“The Polyergus ants are called social parasites – one subspecies taking advantage of another kind of subspecies’ hard work. Another such ant is the Formicoxenus ant, which [uses] chemical camouflage (stealing the odor of their host from their eggs, surroundings) to remain undiscovered. All social parasites use either chemical camouflage or chemical mimicry.”
…………………………..

Not too unlike Jews at all! Jews use hair dye, bleach, makeup, and (ultimately) plastic surgery to accomplish the same result, convincing the unwary to think that they are our own. (Take Joan Rivers for a good example.)

Is it any wonder that nearly all cosmetics companies are founded/owned by Jews?

“I also like the analogy to cowbords (mentioned by Brooks) and cuckoo birds — all considered parasite birds. But these lazy birds expect other birds to hatch and raise their offspring for them. That’s much more like Negroes than Jews. Jews at least do take care to raise their own children and don’t entrust them to others. Jewish children receive very careful upbringing”

That’s true of course, Ein. It’s just that the cowbird analogy is one I was familiar with. The adult cowbird behavior represents the Chosen and the behavior of their young is the model for the burdens, human(??) and otherwise, that they impose upon the host “birds”.

Except for the ethnocentricity (which is almost certainly the deciding factor) ,the middle-class and working-class Jews I’ve known seem to drink from the same poisoned well their Gentile neighbors do. Most people, whatever else they might tell you…simply don’t think. That ethnocentricity may prove their undoing, at some point, because the Jews still seem to place trust in their leader class, while even the the dullest white Gentiles have begun to mistrust theirs.

In my opinion, the root of jewish power is money. It isn’t so much that they “destroy” from within. They’re not burning down buildings and dropping bombs. At least not on us, yet.

They buy everything and everyone. They create banks that allow them to counterfeit as much of the national currency as they want and with that they buy politicians, or the people who comprise the government. They buy many other things as well, and usually at a steep discount once they implement a “depression”. See the “Great Depression” for more details. (What’s so great about a depression, eh?)

Money is the root of their power. But it’s tough to make an analogy out of it because only humans use money. They’re financial parasites. They also use our good natures against ourselves. And they lie without shame or pause. Nothing but humans “talk” (ocean mammals can also communicate) so again, the analogy is tough to make. And people hold words to be sacred. Jews don’t. They say whatever they want and the goyim believe it because they’re by and large gullible morons. See Christianity for more details.

But it all traces back to money and banking control. These lead inevitably to control of whatever hard assets and people they want to buy. We (ordinary people) live our lives enslaved to a constant need for these fancy little pieces of material we call money. You can’t get around that fact.

Jews don’t control any of us directly, but they’ve bought basically all the mass media. So we’re a little like a bunch of fish in jewish waters. The Federal Reserve was completely a jewish creation. It has absolutely no oversight, no accountability, and no one polices it whatsoever. That kind of “power” allows jews to effectively become above the law – because time is money. In other words, human life revolves around money. Thus human life revolves around the jews who control the issuance of money via their various financial institutions around the world. Though most people fail to realize the sinister nature of banking control.

I can’t see an analogy to termites, or ants, or leeches or anything in the natural world. Precisely because an effectively invisible empire of money control is so unnatural.

It’s like if a jew came up and tried to convince your sister to fuck a nigger while he filmed them. She’d probably balk and tell the jew get the fuck away her.

Then the jew says “I’ll give you a thousand dollars.”

And she starts to think.

Now take that microcosm and multiply it out to society at large.

Remember that Nirvana album cover with the naked baby in the pool swimming after the dollar on a hook?

That’s the analogy.

Ben Bernanke was asked regarding the bailout a few months back “Is that taxpayer money?”

Ben “Man of the Year” Bernanke replied (I paraphrase): “No, it’s not taxpayer money. Much as you have accounts with your banks, banks have accounts with the Fed. And we simply use the computers to mark up the accounts of the member banks”

…to the tune of however much imaginary monopoly money the Fed wants to “mark up” to Goldman Sachs, Citigroup, Bank of America, etc. etc. etc. In the case above, it was a cool 700 billion dollars, iirc.

Chew on that for a minute.

DILUTION IS THE JEWISH SOLUTION

IMPURITY IS THE JEWS’ SECURITY

If a movie can be called a metaphor, my vote goes to John Carpenters “They Live”

http://www.matchflick.com/flicks/9703

If you’ve seen it you know what I mean, if not (IMHO) its worth the watch…

“In biology, it is axiomatic that all relationships between parasite and host tend towards symbiosis — a state in which both parties receive some benefits from the relationship. This is because when a parasite kills a host, it often dies too, so it is plainly not in its interest to siphon off too much of its host’s vitality. Ideally, it will even offer the host some benefits, which will further incentivize the host to keep it around. Disease vector/host relationships are similar. …
the Jew is a racial disease, principally of white people, that attempts, via its control of the technology of money, to establish a symbiotic relationship with its host. The benefit to the Jew is obvious. He finds a home and protected from predators by his host, and even intertwines with the host on a genetic and a cultural level.”
………………………….

That is a very interesting observation, Adam. Thank you for that insight. It’s something I don’t think I had been fully aware of, at least not consciously, until recently. But it makes perfect sense. It certainly makes sense for the parasite to offer its host some incentive to keep it around and not destroy it. And it can, in cases, make some sense for the host too, if there seems to be some benefit to be had in the relationship. It’s to the parasite’s interest to find some benefit that it can offer.

Fitting in with that biological observation, I recall reading a news article some months ago about a physician in Ohio (a Jew, as I recall … of course!) who was doing research into the “benefits” that intestinal worms bring to people who have them. I regret I didn’t save the article, but it seems that he has found lower rates of infection of certain diseases and maladies (let’s say arthritis for instance) among those persons who habor worm colonies in their bodies than among people who are free of them. Amazing! It’s repulsive, but it fits in with what you say above. It pays for the parasite to establish a symbotic relationship and keep its host healthy. A healthy host is good for the parasite! And a sensible parasite does not overly drain its host of vitality either, but keeps its numbers under control so that the host can continue to function normally and be productive — for the parasite’s own best benefit, naturally, not for the host’s.