Vanguard News Network

Hard to believe that this guy wrote such a good article and then calls Trotsky the founder of Fascism??? Unfortunately such mistakes are easily recognizable to anyone with a basic knowledge of 20th century History, and will automatically call into question the other ideas the author promotes.

I don’t think the author of this article is a patriotard by any means, but this situation reminds me of some of the erroneous claims about National Socialism and Fascism that are often made in Conservative and patriotard circles. For example, I have had red-blooded, flag waving conservatives actually claim that Communism and National Socialism were one in the same (or that National Socialism is just as bad as Communism). Well I guess these systems are one in the same to someone who’s worldview is opposed to Socialism in any of it’s forms.

1654, the first Jews arrive. Rhode Island,I believe…

And that was all she wrote…all downhill since.

MegaT, the first synagogue in America was located in Newport, RI. I can almost see the damn place from my bunker, located under the ruins of a hilltop British fort. George Washington once either visited the place or wrote them a personal letter, no doubt trying to hit them up for some money to fund his American Revolution. Rhode Island was always a state/colony run by traitorous liberal scumbags, but good old Peter Stuvesant, the Governor of New Amsterdam, courageously refused to let any Jews into his colony. Ironic how New York is now the Jew Capital of the world.

Parsifal, I’m a lifelong captive of Massajewsetts, and very familiar with the perfidy of my dreadful state and Rhode Island’s. That coke snorting mental defective “Patches” is a perfect tableau of the political scene of both states.

Though according to the census, RI is 1.6% of Jew. At least you guys are below the average per population…though in reality we all know that even if there was a handful of Yids in a state,they’d still dominate politics,business and media.

Blackshirt you make a very valid point about the Jews in Newport and the slave trade. Without a doubt they were the prime movers. Unfortunately, the blacks consider the Jew “white”, and therefore “we” are responsible for the slave trade. Explaining the difference to them is a waste, abstract thought processes are about as common in the Negro as blue eyes are.

There’s far more of “us” in New England than people realize.

In traditional Marxism the state owns and controls the corporations.

No: that’s Fascism proper. In “traditional Marxism”, with which you don’t seem to be familiar, “the state” is the communist party, which understands itself as a “dictatorship of the proletariat”. Thus the Nazi regime was closer to “traditional Marxism” than Fascism proper, as a party exercising its will over the state and calling itself “socialism”.

He further imagined that they would be integrated vertically and, of course, socialized.

The burden is on you to show that Gentile or Mussolini were on board with that plan.

“Fascism is simply a form of totalitarian socialism in which a handful of mega-corporations run the state (sound familiar)”

Article 8 of the Dottrina : “Né individui fuori dello Stato, né gruppi (partiti politici, associazioni, sindacati, classi). Perciò il fascismo è contro il socialismo che irrigidisce il movimento storico nella lotta di classe e ignora l’unità statale che le classi fonde in una sola realtà economica e morale; e analogamente, è contro il sindacalismo classista. Ma nell’orbita dello Stato ordinatore, le reali esigenze da cui trasse origine il movimento socialista e sindacalista, il fascismo le vuole riconosciute e le fa valere nel sistema corporativo degli interessi conciliati nell’unità dello Stato.”

Let it be said that both the Marxists and the Fascists misunderstood themselves and had goals beyond, even contrary to, their stated ideals. Fine. But your use of “fascist” is incorrect, the generalized “fascist” with the lower-case f used by leftists; what you mean is totalitarian — avowed by Fascism in its founding document, avowed by Marx and Lenin in their writings. What you hope to show is that both movements were anti-individual; but if you simply read their books you’ll find they made no secret of this, both movements were grandchildren of Hegel, who in turn sought to epitomize the Prussian state in philosophical idealism.

“The Republican party is run by Jewish neo-Fascists or neo-corporatists (corporatism being Mussolini’s preferred term for fascism).”

Apart from exaggerating, you’re not aware that corporatismo, in 1920’s Italy, meant something very different from “corporatism” in English, 2009. In English, corporazioni is translated “guilds”, even “trade unions”, not “corporations”. These guilds, which were associations of tradesmen and professionals (Latin corporatus, “embodied”, or bodies of men; fascio itself means “bundle / group”), and again not big corporations (which weren’t all that big back then, bear well in mind), were to be patronized by the Fascist state — nothing more; most of the NSDAP’s early adherents were drawn from the same classes. So this picture of Fascism as enshrining corporations in the modern sense in its conception of the state is bogus, a “straw man”. But it is, surprisingly, just here that Fascism and Marxism come together in their patronage of traditional labor roles: precisely the opposite of the Big Business State you conjure up to scare yourself. Whereas America, at the precisely the same time, really did enshrine the corporation in state politics by granting it the rights of an individual.

The Democratic party is, of course run by Jewish Cultural Marxists.

I don’t buy your “of course”. It’s of course only in your head and the heads of WNs who are convinced what Jews do is synonymous with “Cultural Marxism”.

Cultural Marxism is basically Stalinism combined with racial identity politics.

And here we see the absolute unread backwardness of your thinking. “Cultural Marxism” is precisely the opposite of Stalinism by definition — you need to read Gramsci, who coined the term in a prison cell. Cultural Marxism is a response to the capitalist state’s suppression of the Marxist narrative: cut off from official avenues to power, the Marxist is forced to act on the culture of the people to insinuate his doctrine, etc. Thus it is literally opposed to Stalinism, which is nothing more than charismatic totalitarianism. You, and I mean this word for word, have no idea what you’re talking about.