Vanguard News Network

“All this online bickering between us (which was started by ZOG and McReen, by the way) is nothing compared to the real-life fighting that takes place among the Jews. They trick foolish goyim like ZOG and McReen into thinking they are unified and relentless in their aims, but in reality the Jews hate and scheme against each other more than they hate and scheme against us. And yet they wield all this power over us!”

Oh please, you toady. If you weren’t here there would be no disruption.

All started by your egomaniacal attempts to impose your dogmatic Jahnish marxist-fascism on VNN and flame attacks on anyone who criticises left-wingers, just like the tedious weeks-long forum war you started before your banning. There is no ‘us’ for you as you obviously are not one of US.

A note to the sometimes overly-pious types who waft their fans and faint at the first sign of what they call ‘bickering’: while I admire the restraint of those who strive to avoid flame wars at all times (and I agree that the time COULD otherwise be better spent), the price paid is that obvious infiltrators like Mike Jahn/Jett Rink/Parsfial/Blackshirt can opt in and build up a profile here, thus leading newbies to believe that they and their views are credible and accepted by all and sundry within WN.

A laissez-faire attitude towards the anti trolls also leaves them to pursue what I have observed as their common agenda here in recent months, which is to push White nationalism to the left and reinvent it as a quasi-marxist movement. Jahn-troll’s posts are peppered with jew-leftist remarks/attacks which are no different to those I see in the MSM. It also seems that they even want us sucking up to the red flag-waving anti crowd for “recruits”.

Not only is that stupid and a waste of time, it’s potentially dangerous and above all an attempt to nullify our cause.

Keep all this in mind while inhaling the smelling salts.

I implore Socrates or Alex to prove that I’m not Parsifal. At least then this wackjob McReen will have part of his argument destroyed. Seriously, Socrates please contact me if you need to or confirm if you can I am not Parsifal so this fruitcake McReen will have to eat his words. I’m sick to death of his paranoid ramblings and we can put at least part of his BS to rest.

My posts appear to be selectively posted.

I recall that Zarathustra was originally Heinrich Himmler; but some posters urged him to change it, which he very willingly did. He used to attack and sub-divide whites with ethnic insults which he found quite “funny” and he urged others to do the same. Until he was called to task for it by Socrates, if I am correct.

But he was not the one who disappeared from here in a cursing, sputtering fit of rage. Nuff said.

Don’t forget Blackshirt and Junghans.

Ein said:
“He used to attack and sub-divide whites with ethnic insults which he found quite “funny” and he urged others to do the same. Until he was called to task for it by Socrates, if I am correct.”

I think you have Zarathustra mixed up with someone else. I was posting here back when Zarathustra was here and if anything he took Nordic Supremacists here to task for disparaging remarks against non- Nordics such as Slavs and Meds. I remember this because I feel the same way.

“Zarathustra was here and if anything he took Nordic Supremacists here to task for disparaging remarks against non- Nordics such as Slavs and Meds. “

Not so. It was exactly the reverse. I recall, for instance, another poster Krystian KKK, who was of Polish descent, whom Zarathustra/Heinrich Himmler used to needle regularly with disparaging remarks. And that’s just one example. I recall taking Krystian’s side and admonishing Zara that this kind of “humor” was not productive and was damaging to white unity. Even then this bickering and squabbling was going on. Is my memory faulty? I don’t think so. I will gladly apologize if I’m wrong.

There is a lingering problem in the WN struggle regarding Nordic “supremacy”. And I fear that if left unchecked, it will stir up an old, self-destructive conflict among racially concious Whites. The Christian Identity movement is also a potential source of trouble, as its followers are more interested in following the Christ cult and in saving themselves from eternal hellfire than with helping out their fellow White man.

Additionally, there are some on this site who seem to enjoy nonstop arguing about their pet conspiracy theories and accusing others of being so and so in disguise instead of trying to formulate a plan of attack against the enemy. All that paranoia and all those accustations will get Whites absolutely NOWHERE. But I’m sure it will continue unabated. Right, ZOG?

There are some excellent comments here by Brutus, 2050, Ein and many others. Since I have been mentioned as an ‘accomplice’ of several posters here, may I have a word in edgewise? I may be sarcastic and cynical at times, but I usually try to add insight to the dialogue, especially about our white foibles, which I think are our biggest problem. How can you save a race of people from themselves? Some of my opinions undoubtedly bruise other’s egos, but that cuts both ways, and I respect other views, if sincerely articulated. Unfortunately, because of the nature of this open, free wheeling blog site, this place has more than its share of trolls, agents provocateurs, disruptors and gutter snipers, which is to be expected. The lack of monitoring control of the worst of these ad hominem polemics is, however, regrettable. It is, no doubt, also a much spied upon ‘honey pot’, as it draws in all kinds of opponents of the Zog system. Constructive disagreements, and discussion should be the order of the day here, however, not paranoid fratricide.

As regards these disruptive elements, who knows for sure what their real motives are? Some may be sincere, as I suspect some are, while others are enemy dissimulators. Most of them rarely contribute meaningful ideas or comments. They only carp and snipe. They are disruptors at best, and enemy agents at worst, and can be easily recognized as such.

Hey, ZOG, you forgot to accuse me of being Melcur!

Are you denying you’re a fool?

Why don’t you stay on topic for a change and discuss the Supreme Court nomination of Affirmative Action Judge Sonia “The Spicarina” Sotomayor? You and Tom couldn’t stick to the subject at hand if your lives depended on it.