20 February, 2009

Walt Rostow: King of Vietnam War Policy

Posted by Socrates in jewed foreign policy, jewed politics, Jewish warmongering, Socrates, Vietnam War, war, war as a racket at 12:16 am | Permanent Link

Warmongering: it’s a Jewish specialty, and Rostow’s involvement in Vietnam policy-making is a fine example of it. How many dead, White men would be alive today without Rostow’s significant influence on Vietnam policy? Rostow’s brother, Eugene, was also involved with Vietnam policy, but to a lesser degree:

[Article].

A book about Rostow: [Here].


  • 66 Responses to “Walt Rostow: King of Vietnam War Policy”

    1. Ein Says:

      “Her brother, Edgar von Westphalen, a follower of Marx, was involved with the German settlements in the h ill country of San Antonio.”
      (note:This article says a “freethinker colony”, but I have read somewhere else that it was for re-settlement of primarily German Jews fleeing the failed revolution in Germany.)
      “http://william-king.www.drexel.edu/top/eco/thotw09/Marx.ppt#280,4,A Texas Sidelight
      http://william-king.www.drexel.edu/top/eco/thotw09/Marx.ppt#279,1,History of Economic Ideas

      http://www.springerlink.com/content/n5618171377266h1/

      • Jewish Immigrant Information Bureau (Galveston, TX), I-90: Includes internal correspondence of
      JIIB staff, correspondence between JIIB and other organizations, and ship passenger lists of
      immigrants who came through Galveston from Germany. A searchable name index to this collection,
      created through a grant from the Jewish Genealogical Society of New York, can be found at
      http://findingaids.cjh.org/?fnm=JIIBGalveston0 2&pnm=AJHS
      —————————
      Even the fabulously wealthy Baron de Hirsch (Jewish) sponsored Jewish immigration to Texas.
      “America’s leading Jewish philanthropist, Jacob Schiff, and the Baron Maurice de Hirsch of France viewed Mexico as a promising site for Russian Jewish resettlement. De Hirsch had already created a fund to bring European Jewish immigrants to American ports such as Galveston, Texas, from which they departed to rural homes in Arkansas, Kansas, North Dakota and other states .”
      http://www.ajhs.org/publications/chapters/chapter.cfm?documentID=226

    2. Ein Says:

      For what it´s worth, here´s something I consider an EXTREMELY interesting quotation. This amazing comment about the extent of Jewish power over the USA was made in 1844:

      “With the hindsight of events that transpired after the fall of the Soviet Union, it appears that the most profound analysis of Karl Marx was not his economic analysis, but his analysis of religion. Rooted in the philosophy of the Enlightenment with Voltaire warning that the particularistic religious precepts may “some day become deadly to the human race” Karl Marx, with astounding prescience, foresees the rise of Judeo-Protestantism that promotes egoism wrapped in religion.
      Marx critique of Judaism was summarized in his Zur Judenfrage, published in 1844 in the Deutsch-Franzosische Jarbucher. His arguments are based on the thesis that the core of Judaism is extreme partiality, instrumental in the accumulation of wealth. Marx observes that in North America, Jews exercise immense power and the domination of Judaism over the Christian world is fait accompli.
      http://www.visualstatistics.net/Catastrophe/Jenny%20Marx/Jenny%20Marx.htm

    3. Howdy Doody Says:

      Ein, Thanks for the good post.

      So the few Academics in the last 175 years who knew of these items, must have been in disbelief, and most likely perhaps jooos communications and cohesiveness is and was much better in reallity than most of us could know of.

    4. Socrates Says:

      Ein: I don’t know why two of your posts got stuck in the spam filter. But I see that you were able to alter the post and send it through.

    5. Ein Says:

      “Ein: I don’t know why two of your posts got stuck in the spam filter.”
      – – – – – – – – – –
      I don´t either. I tried several times. No good. Perhaps the post was too long. Came back and tried again later. Still wouldn´t go. So I tried splitting it up …. and it went through!

      Where I am (South America) it´s very difficult accessing this site, and it has become even more difficult to do lately.

    6. Ein Says:

      (This did not go through either, whatever the obstruction. Will try again.)
      – – – – – – – – –
      In further regard to that remarkable observation made by Marx, in 1844, that Jews had already attained “immense power and domination over North America”, let me add this about the Rothschilds. And note that significant date: 1844.

      Augustus Schoenberg (later Belmont), of Frankfurt Germany, was an employee and a relative of the Rothschilds by marriage (though an uncle). In 1837, he was sent to Cuba as the represeentative of the Rothchild banking house. Spain at that time was embroiled in a civil war and the Spanish royalists were receiving large sums through Havana.

      In 1837, the House of Rothschild posted Schoenberg to Havana, to manage the firm’s interests there. At the time, Cuba was a possession of the Spanish empire, and … its monarch, Queen Christina, was receiving large sums through the island to finance her side against the Carlist claimants to the throne.

      Schoenberg then settled in New York, where he took charge of the Rothschild banking interests. He changed his name to Belmont (it being French for Schoenberg, sounding less Jewish) and became an American citizen. “He became an American citizen and joined the Democratic Party to further establish himself, becoming a generous supporter (Wikipedia). In 1844 he was made U.S. consul general for Austria.

      In 1849, he married the New York socialite Caroline Slidell Perry, niece of Oliver Hazard Perry, the War of 1812 naval hero. She was also the daughter of Commodore Matthew Perry, another famed naval officer. Four years after the marriage, in 1853, Belmont’s father-in-law would sail to Japan and force its feudal rulers to allow Western ships after a 250-year ban. Such a union added immeasurably to Belmont’s status (and wealth). The newlyweds lived in one of the first residences built on Fifth Avenue. http://www.answers.com/topic/august-belmont

      The New York Sun, commenting on Belmont’s wine cellar, called it perhaps the finest in America at the time. There were rumors that Belmont’s wine bills sometimes exceeded $20,000 in a single month, (although) he was occasionally criticized for asking his elderly father-in-law, Commodore Perry, to go fetch a vintage from the cellar.

      Note Caroline`s name, Slidell. It`s further worth noting that the Slidell`s were backers of the South in the American Civil War. One of the Slidell sisters was married to the Jewish banker in Paris, Baron Erlanger. Thus while Belmont, representing the Rothschild`s, was backing the North in the war, the Slidell`s were financing the South. “He (Belmont) also worked behind the scenes to assure the Rothschilds and other influential names in Europe that the North would prevail:”

      The Erlangers were another family of Jewish bankers who had originated in Frankfurt and were related to the Rothschild`s.
      http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=9B04E4D91E39E433A25755C1A9649C94699ED7CF
      There is today the Erlanger Hospitalof the Univer. of Tenneess in Cattanooga.

      “It was the generosity of a French nobleman in 1889 that led to the creation of Chattanooga’s leading healthcare provider. Dismayed by a lack of local medical care, the Baron d’Erlanger – who had vast railroad holdings in this region – donated $5000 to build a hospital in Chattanooga. In today’s dollars, his contribution would be the equivalent of more than $4 million.

      Appreciative city leaders named the new facility for its benefactor’s wife, Baroness Marguerite Mathilde Slidell d’Erlanger.” http://www.erlanger.org/giving/

      The Erlangers-Slidells financed railroads throughout the South and were even related by marriage to Winston Churchill, as well as to to Averill Harriman, the American railroad tycoon/politician and Rothschild agent in America. ttp://www.neworleansbar.org/documents/ENews08Nostalgia0109RailroadBaron.pdf

    7. Zarathustra Says:

      “Then Mr. Roastruds tribe gave US MOVIES like Easy Rider, MASH, Catch 22, from 1968 to 1972 shown on US Mililtary based P.X. theaters, and they gave US radical crap on our College’s and perversion/subversion in our government….”

      A Vietnam veteran friend of mine remembers all the hoopla that accompanied the release of the movie Patton at his Army base (I know, it’s called a post, not a base) in 1970. All the generals and colonels on the base were in attendence for the premiere screening. They had all been young officers in WWII, some even served under Patton. Unsurprisingly, the movie recieved thunderous applause.

      A week or two later, another new war movie was shown on the base, M*A*S*H. All the Korean War-era officers and enlisteds on the base came out to see it, but apparently neither they nor the Army recreation department realized what kind of a movie it really was. My friend says the audience was so insulted, they almost tore the screen off the wall, or words to that effect.

      Yes, 1968 to 1972 was the era of the “antihero” in Hollywood movies, from Benjamin Braddock in The Graduate, to Joe Buck and Ratso Rizzo in Midnight Cowboy, to Captain Yossarian in Catch 22. Then Jaws and Star Wars came along and movies just became big-budgeted, mindless mass entertainment after that.

    8. Futurist Joe Says:

      Would it be fair to say that “antihero” among its other meanings could also mean heroes who look a lot more like the normal average Jew? Today somebody like Sacha Noam Baron Cohen or Adam Sadler can be 20 mill dollar leads. Not until after the sixties could that have been true. Is that fair to say?

      They didn’t have to find a gentile looking figurehead then. The stars could look more like the people who were always behind the camera or with the books.

      They finally came out of the closet and antihero = Jew who can look like a Jew. Sure Joe Buck looks gentile and a typical Hollywood old school star. But how about Ratso Rizzo? Who looks like him in the old movies. Maybe Peter Lorre? That’s about it and Lorre’s character was always left as despicable and evil. You were never suppose to understand or feel sad for Peter Lorre.

      I wonder why George C Scott gave the finger to the academy and didn’t come to get his award. Something about competition at the time but maybe he was saying something else? They never forgave him for doing that as I recall. Was he doing a Mel Gibson while drunk statement move in some way you think?

    9. Zarathustra Says:

      At the 1970 Academy Awards, John Wayne was annoyed that Midnight Cowboy won Best Picture. “It’s just a movie about two fags”, he groused. Can you imagine any he-man actor today talking about Brokeback Mountain or The Crying Game like that? It would be curtains for his career.

      Now that you mention it, Mr. Futurist, many of those Hollywood antiheroes were indeed Jews, except for Dennis Hopper, Jack Nicholson (both Micks) and Peter Fonda (Eye-talian).

    10. gw Says:

      Baron de Hirsch, Baron Erlanger, Baron Rothschild , Disraeli (Earl of Beaconsfield), the banker Sir Ernest Cassel…on and on. I can´t help noticing all these phony European “noblemen”.

      In reality, they were all Frankfurt banking Jews, masquerading behind their bought and paid for titles.

    11. Z.O.G. Says:

      Baron de Hooknose and Lord von Gefilte Fish.

      :-D

    12. Z.O.G. Says:

      Baron de Moneylender and Lord von Coin clipper

    13. Chonodomarius Says:

      The author of Steel Helmets points out that Johnson,Nixon and Billy Gram all had the surnames and typical features of Northumbrian border freebooters.

    14. Chonodomarius Says:

      Steel Bonnets not Helmets, Graham not Gram read the intro at amazon

    15. gw Says:

      “Today somebody like Sacha Noam Baron Cohen or Adam Sadler can be 20 mill dollar leads. Not until after the sixties could that have been true. Is that fair to say?”

      Yes, it’s fair. It seems that Woody Allen and Dustin Hoffman led the way. Then later, Seinfeld. And especially Barbra Stresand; don’t forget her… she made it acceptable for female stars to look and act Jewish. And Joan Rivers made it acceptable for them to talk Jewish… (mean and nasty).

    16. whodareswings Says:

      These two advised Walt Rostow. They are “game theory” Nobel Laureates whose game theories never worked and caused 2 million deaths. How do these guys sleep at night?

      http://www.voltairenet.org/article130204.html