14 February, 2009

France Moves Closer to NATO

Posted by Socrates in Afghanistan, France, jewed culture, jewed foreign policy, jewed politics, Jews in government, Kosovo, NATO, Socrates, UN, UN founders at 7:32 pm | Permanent Link

Jewish president Nicolas Sarkozy knows that you can’t remake the world without global outfits like NATO, which made the new, Muslim state of Kosovo possible. But NATO – which is basically a military version of the UN – has its limitations, as seen currently in Afghanistan. NATO could be called a Jewish creation, since it sprang from the UN Charter, which was written by the Jewish, U.S. State Department official Leo Pasvolsky:

[Article].


  • 63 Responses to “France Moves Closer to NATO”

    1. shabbos s. shabazz Says:
      18 February, 2009 at 10:22 pm

      That was intended as levyty, as most change last names.

      I had an email exchange with gottfried, suggesting that jonah goldberg’s real name was rube, and that he was “another jewish name changer.” Gottfried cracked up.

    2. gw Says:
      19 February, 2009 at 12:55 am

      “That was intended as levyty, as most change last names.”

      I see. Well, now I kahn understand what jew were getting at.

    3. Z.O.G. Says:
      19 February, 2009 at 3:22 pm

      Give it up, gw. Christine Lallouette is a Jewess.

      Check this out. I can’t find the name “Lallouette” in any online database of surnames. The ONLY place I found this name was in the Avotaynu Consolidated Jewish Surname Index. So this means that “Lallouette” is an obscure Jewish French surname that is only had by a couple of Jews living in France.

      ;-)

    4. Z.O.G. Says:
      19 February, 2009 at 3:26 pm

      Could be. Not impossible. But in that case, I would have to assume that she has, essentially, turned away from Judaism. I can’t imagine that any observant Jew would have a name with “Christ” in it. Thus, I said it seems extremely unlikely.

      Nicholas Sarkozy is a self-proclaimed “Roman Catholic”, and so is Christina Lallouette(Lagarde). So much for your theory, huh? ;-)

    5. shabbos s. shabazz Says:
      19 February, 2009 at 5:28 pm

      IN an interview Nicolas Sarkozy gave in 2004, he expressed an extraordinary understanding of the plight of the Jewish people for a home: “Should I remind you the visceral attachment of every Jew to Israel, as a second mother homeland? There is nothing outrageous about it. Every Jew carries within him a fear passed down through generations, and he knows that if one day he will not feel safe in his country, there will always be a place that would welcome him. And this is Israel.”

      “Sarkozy’s sympathy and understanding is most probably a product of his upbringing it is well known that Sarkozy’s mother was born to the Mallah family, one of the oldest Jewish families of Salonika, Greece.”

      http://www.ajn.com.au/news/news.asp?pgID=3162

    6. Coup d'Etat Says:
      19 February, 2009 at 5:41 pm

      Zog,

      To rationalize with trolls like gw, Ein, and Miss & Mr. Zara is like rationalizing with psychopaths. They will also state the last names, “Smith” or “Myers” or “Johnson” can’t be surnames of a jew. That’s the sort of mentality they have. Lie, lie, and lie again.

      Jews: “Flying under the radar.”

    7. Z.O.G. Says:
      19 February, 2009 at 11:56 pm

      Coup d’Etat,

      Are you saying that Zarathustra is a female? Now that you mention it, I HAVE noticed that “his” writing style is very feminine. Interesting.

    8. Zarathustra Says:
      20 February, 2009 at 12:59 am

      “Coup d’Etat,

      Are you saying that Zarathustra is a female? Now that you mention it, I HAVE noticed that “his” writing style is very feminine. Interesting.”

      OMG! Like, you are such a TOTAL bitch! Ewwww!

    9. Z.O.G. Says:
      20 February, 2009 at 2:18 pm

      Hey, Zar.

      Have you decided whether you’re British or American yet? Just last week you said that your father attended a very exclusive private school in New York City where MOST of the students were Jewish. Oh, and you said that your mother dated “several” Jewish guys when she was younger.

      LOL :-D

    10. Ein Says:
      23 February, 2009 at 5:21 pm

      Anyone who has lived in New York, as I have, knows that you’re going to have Jewish neighbors and Jewish schoolmates. That`s inevitable. And the better and more espensive the school, the more Jews it will have. So what? What does that have to do with Zara’s father?

      As for his mother dating some Jewish guys when she was young, that’s not the least uncommon either, especially in New York where you’re surrounded with jews. Big deal! A lot of people, like my own parents, haven’t a clue about Jews. That’s very common. So leave his parents out of it!

      It´s difficult enough accessing this site, without coming here to read this kind of personal abuse and garbage.

      As usual, you`re dealing in allegations, distortions, and personal slander, instead of with facts and reason. You NEVER have any documentation or facts about anything! Only allegations and insinuations. Your only motive is to disrupt and sow dissention. It is quite clear what you are doing here! You and Miss Etat, the two of you. Frankly, I don’t understand why this site allows it.

    11. shabbos s. shabazz Says:
      23 February, 2009 at 6:00 pm

      THE KWA

      If it weren’t

      so clueless

      It would be

      so jewless

      BUMMA SHAVE

    12. Zarathustra Says:
      23 February, 2009 at 7:45 pm

      Brother Shabazz, keep the haiku coming!

      And thank you, herr Ein. People who always resort to ad hominem attacks and baseless accusations instead of STICKING TO THE FACTS should be discouraged from posting here, IMO. I just thought I’d share an anecdote or two about my own family’s experiences with The Tribe. One must always be extremely cautious when dealing with those people. They don’t even trust or like each other, for crissakes.

    13. Ein Says:
      25 February, 2009 at 6:03 am

      People who always resort to ad hominem attacks and baseless accusations instead of STICKING TO THE FACTS should be discouraged from posting here, IMO.
      ————–

      In my opiñioñ too. They ñeed to resort resort to ad hominem attacks instead of facts because they don’t have any facts.