Vanguard News Network

When you think about the mass influx of Koran-Cracking zealots into the UK and similar paragons of feminism, the inevitable conflict is nothing short of hilarious to contemplate. I suspect that one day soon the mass of them may be offered a choice between burqas and blades to the neck. That “tolerance” has one hell of an ROI, doesn’t it?

Many years ago I worked with the banking business. Our business involved selling and installing vaults, vault doors and other equipment. For this reason we were always talking to bank owners, presidents and higher ups about various contractual matters. We soon took notice that while the overwhelming majority of owners were men, (I cannot remember a woman owner) yet almost all the banks were staffed from the top down by women. In fact if you did see any men in a bank, it was typically in the position of teller or mid level loan officer/manager. One day as we concluded a contract, my partner asked the owner, “what is it with all the women in banks, why is it that banks are almost totally staffed by women?” Without batting an eye the owner replied, “It’s really a simple matter, women work for less money and they are honest.” Jews love the idea of slavery. Jews, like any wise slave master, prefer their slaves meek and fully compliant, thus women make the best slaves to do their bidding. One of the most telling descriptions I read concerning this matter was a description of the Rothschild’s view on women. I do not remember the quote exactly but it basically indicated that Rothschild (men) viewed women as toys, as something (not someone) to be used then discarded at will. The jews have long played the matriarchy card on the white man, but the fact is their own system’s power structure is based on patriarchy. While jews might tolerate women in the lower roles of their power structure, they never allow them into the highest circles of power and control. It would be interesting to find out exactly how many women have positions of power or run within the walls of the central banker’s economic holy of holies. None I suspect. I suppose that sums it up other than the fact that I have long noticed the traits that people fear and detest most in others are the very traits that dominate their own personality.

P.S. Before anyone goes jumping up to point out examples of Jewish women “leaders” like Golda Meir, Nancy Pelosi or Kathryn Graham, one needs to reevaluate their actual positions within the jew’s power structure. Such women are actually nothing more than useful tools as is any Negro, like say Obama. If there are Negroes or women holding the apparent reins of power, you can rest assured there are higher ups giving them orders. This is much like a bank president versus an owner. While the bank president appears to run the bank, they do so only within those limitations set forth by the owner(s).

“Jews love the idea of slavery. Jews, like any wise slave master, prefer their slaves meek and fully compliant, thus women make the best slaves to do their bidding.”

Some dot-mud said that Whites prefer female muds over male muds for the very same reason.

Look at any date site is full of divorced teachers, other sorts of public employee’s and the diveroced three to four time types, no thank you.

So they get their “Degree, all with a minor in hating all that is Western, though they enjoy all that was western created.

Colleges have produced too many wanna be make believe I am native american or other b.s.

They are the weaker sex and the regime has played them big time for the majority of Women, and White women voted for bammy boot lips more so than dumb men.

McNutt and O’bammy, oh what choices.

ALEX LINDER:

Please Listen to this:

http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/12/06/jesse-trentadue/
Old Friend,
Best Wishes

Let’s face it fellas: College has been sold to the dumb masses as something EVERYBODY is entitled to attend. Fifty years ago, college was for a few really top females and White males. I know because my dad was a dept. chairman at a university and his students would come to our house for various functions. And I would spend a lot of time at his office and the university. His students back in the fifties through the mid sixties were the men who went on to become presidential speechwriters, college presidents, college professors, etc. They really were the best students. The females were too. No niggers or muds back then. It was a White world and it was wonderful.

One of his former debate students from the University of Richmond is now the Commissioner of the PGA Tour–Tim Finchem. (I think that’s his title anyway) A few turned out liberal, but most back then were conservative.

Anyway (sorry, I get to reminiscing with examples), my point is that nowadays everyone who graduates from high school believes they NEED to go to college. Most actually DON’T. Many could go to trade school and learn a trade which would fare them much better, probably, than spending four years doing nothing and getting out with a degree. Many females do waste college years pursuing early childhood degrees or interior decorating degrees (ugh!) or fashion merchandising or some such crapola. Worse yet, sociology and/or social work. What a waste of time and energy.

But, HOW to change the course of the way things are? How to reach these young women with another perspective other than the one they see on Oprah or the front cover of the latest rag at the grocery store?

The rags and talk shows are all geared toward females becoming “liberated” and “independent” etc. I’m all for women knowing how to take care of themselves if the need arises. But how do you counter all the propaganda out there and make females want to get married young, start having children young, and stay married and be good mothers and wives.

Well, one way is to be good husbands and fathers. No woman wants a sorry husband and father. That knife cuts both ways. If you want a female who will stay married to you, have your children, be faithful to you, etc., then you MUST do the same things for her. Otherwise, she will not stick around. You can’t expect her to be faithful if you are out every night whooping it up with the boys. Nuh uh. If that’s what you think marriage is about, don’t bother with it. Just remain a single guy and go after gals. Forget marriage and having children. Cause sooner or later she’ll tire of that and leave you. I’ve seen it happen too many times. Eventually, women wise up and leave.

So, what are the ideas for getting women to decide that being stay at home moms and wives is the best way to go nowadays?

Muslim annihilation of feminism will not happen. Thats a sop Jew politicians and media handed to the Goyim to keep them occupied for a while.

“That knife cuts both ways. If you want a female who will stay married to you, have your children, be faithful to you, etc., then you MUST do the same things for her. Otherwise, she will not stick around.”

Get real. Women file for 75%+ of divorces; always have and probably always will. Even if the men were not “cheating” the female application for divorce in a no-fault system would still be at the levels they are today. The stats bear it out that women are at least as promiscuous as men, and are more promiscuous by nature. Something like 25% of female teenagers have STDs that will give you an idea. Where do you think they got those from?

Left to their own devices, given total freedom on the matter women cannot handle marriage.

Here’s a fun song:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cKCRHhmHvjg&feature=related

We can thank Jewish “feminsts” like Gloria Steinem and Betty Freidan for this destructive battle of the sexes. Ironically, there is nothing feminine about those feminists at all.

But in all fairness, it’s not just stupid, shallow “girls gone wild” types who clog up the nation’s college campuses. It’s spoiled asshole guys too, with their binge drinking and dumb frat boy behavior. I was very naive when I went to college. I honestly thought there would be a great deal of intellectual discourse and inquiry. Instead, it was mostly spoiled White kids who just wanted a cushy, well-paying office job after graduation, with 4 years of partying and goofing off till then. For most students, college is just an excuse to delay adulthood for another 4 years.

Four years and a hundred thousand dollars or so–just to become a lesbian.

“I was very naive when I went to college. I honestly thought there would be a great deal of intellectual discourse and inquiry.”

I went to college solely to raise hell (I have always read, however, agressively on my own). I well knew by then what public school was really all about: control, indoctronation of self hate. So I made my C’s and my professors and I had an understood armistice. When they said something I just shooved my finger down my throat and threw it back up after class.

However I did decide to go to graduate school and thought it would be different. Alas, no.

On the marriage front–I have just seen too much to go for that. There are so few happily married folks I know my age it scares me. And the divorce will be even worse, and than the aftermath. Ya’ll know the old saying, “women have half the money and all the pus–y.” Oh so true.

I have noticed many women that I know–old and young–have changed in the wrong direction over the last decade. They feel like they have to prove something. They are utterly full of guilt and this translates into buying things and feeling sorry for animals and other races besides their own. I’m sure I am not the only one to have encountered a women so hard-headed that not only can you do nothing with them but they offended you–yes offend you–by their lack of reason or respect for polite intellectual honesty. The married men are scared to even sneeze because it may turn over the boat. Then the women losses repect for the fellow. If he fights then the rancour starts. Either way you see the dead end. When that Big boat–our society–does turn over, we may all get back on the same page again. TV, mags, school, and competition among friends have cooked their brains and the man is frozen in the headlights like a scared deer.

And then there’s the children growing up in all this…

PS–why does someone always steal my handle? Too simple, I guess.

To my mind, marriage should be a partnership as well as a friendship of two equals who respect each other and love each other more than they love themselves.

I HAVE NEVER SEEN SUCH A THING!!!!!!!!!!

What I have seen are marriages where the wife is basically the husband’s servant, or cold, lifeless marriages or marriages that are merely for convenience, political or business reasons. And I ‘ve seen more than a few marriages where the spouses are constantly at each others’ throats, fighting even in front of the kids.

The closest thing to an “ideal” marriage would probably be the one between the late Paul Newman and Joanne Woodward. They were married for 50 years and never once was there a single scandal or rumour about them in the Hollywood rags. But I don’t think most people have the maturity or temprament needed for a really successful, long-term commitment to another person. That is something that is neither bad nor good, it just is a fact.

I agree, KKK. Far too much emotional energy and money is spent on trying to make marriages work. Besides, it goes against our evolutionary instincts to be tied down to one spouse till death. Us guys have the instinctive urge to “plant our seed” wherever we can. I’m not saying we should behave like Slick Wille, or anything. But maybe we should be like the wops in Italy? They always have a “goomar” or two on the side. Mussolini was very good to his wife and family as well as his mistress. The same with Marcello Mastriani. Or would that offend our Anglo-Saxon/Nordic/Celtic sensibilities?

The pragmatical view of marriage is that it ought to be one of convenience. Our pagan ancestors understood this; they’d find the idea of marriage out of love a strange idea indeed – in fact, they’d probably think of Paris and Helen of Troy and say “fuck love, too many disasters that way.” Much better to craft socio-economic bonds through the institution of marriage.

Marriage is also the construct in which we can bring children into this world with some semblance of safety and support. This only works if the “wymmen” are subservient. In a world where every uppity twat thinks they’re the center of the goddamned universe, the political institution of marriage is in decay.

To modern feminists, so much the better. They have long had the goal of deteriorating the nuclear family into a new socialist mentality where all children are the responsibility of the state.

In any new society we might hypothetically build, feminism will be strictly verboten – on pain of exile (and if that ain’t deterrent enough, well…)

———————————————————————————-

As an aside, I’m not against polygamy. Its natural. But we are not ape mongrel savages, so we understand that the best way to ensure the survival of our genetic community is by taking care of our offspring. I would never advocate for derelict behavior – I’m arguing against the traditional (Judeo-Christian) narrative of what marriage is.

Food for thought: another adaptive strategy amongst primates is infanticide of rival groups’ children – now there’s an idea!

As usual the article leads about the battle of the sexes draws spirited commentary.I would like to start by praising several commentators on the coloum.Susan,gb,and Zarathustra all well done observations.Herr Zarathustra’s definition of Marriage is nothing short of brilliant,and the best definition of what the Institution of the the Sacred Covenant between Man and Woman I’ve ever read.-I quote- “To my mind ,Marriage should be a partnership AS WELL AS a friendship between two EQUALS who respect each other and love each other MORE than they love themselves.”Utterly the STANDARD by which all relationships in the New Reich should be measured!I congratulate you Herr Z,I would have paid money somewhere to here that in school.Your Definition makes the Skulls “Quoteable Quotes File”.I think I will measure ANY future relationship I happen to be in by that standard.

Arminius, what if the husband has a gambling or drinking problem? What if he’s spending all the family’s money on porn or prostitutes? What if he invested their life savings in stocks that lost all their value? Men don’t necessarily have any more financial sense than women.

And there aren’t many women around today who would accept your 1950s June and Ward Cleaver time-warp philosophy, either.

“I’m arguing against the traditional (Judeo-Christian [sic]) narrative of what marriage is.”

So too are the judeo-feminists.

Miscegenation. See? I can spell it! I just can’t DO it. I have to stay within my own species.

On a half-serious note, I propose the complete abolition of ALL forms of marriage in AmeriKwa. It would end or at least significantly reduce the loads of needless misery that tens of millions of AmeriKwans currently suffer through each year, as well as lower the volume of the Fag Brigade to a noticable degree, not to mention effectively nullify any hypothetical “Multiracial Couples ONLY” legislation that may be tossed our way.

On another note, having an opinion that runs parallel to that of a jew doesn’t necessarily make one a jew.

For an Aryan society to work, it MUST be patriarchal. Go to the library and look at any popular magazines of fifty years ago. The men were always shown in the ads as being strong and in charge. The women were always shown as housewives, secretaries, etc; and they looked very feminine. If niggers were even portrayed at all, they were usually porters or shoe shine boys. Back in those days people would think you were crazy if you said that in fifty years whites would accept a nigger as president.

Both Saudi Arabia and Afghanistan have relatively high birth rates. I have no love for Mohammedanism, but patriarchal societies are far more successful and dynamic, at least in the darwinian sense that ferftility alone is the mark of a species to survive. In all the feminized societies in the West, the birth rate is far below replacement level. How many of those “Aryan heroines “had any kids, Zarathusra?

The mere percentage of college grad-JEW-ates is bad enough in itself, but worse is WHAT kinds of “degrees” or “disciplines” this swarm of papered dykes will come with. it WON’T be in anything requiring real brains, like physics or engineering, rest assured. These kinds of discipline are too tough even for kikes to really excel in, even after 60 yrs of “Einsteinism” which has largely reduced physics to a talmudic cult. Furthermore, disciplines involving rational thought applied to objective reality are by their nature, contra-judaic, a term I recommend using in place of the zionist coined “anti-semitic.”

No, these kosher-kuntz will come out with degrees in shit like “human sexuality,” sociology and some business filth, to wit, degrees certifying that these whores will turn tricks for their kike masters 24/7. Look for expanded roles for “criminology” too, encouraging them, to snitch off and imprison Aryan men, while they then copulate with sundry darkies of either sex.

This will happen in Talmudistan West (the Jew. S. A.) just as it is now in Talmudistan Island. We need to organize our own underground collegiate-level system for our Folk, preserving and expanding real Science and Technology, disciplines which Aryans have always excelled in and which have given us the strategic advantage over the nasty mud-morons, as they and their sheenie masters know, and leave the dregs to the hymies.

Gerald Edward Patrick Morris

“I spoke with a conservative relative recently who told me an all-too-familiar story. He had sent his daughters to college and they became mad-dog radicals. Of course, I sympathized with my cousin, but I was rather surprised at his surprise. If you give someone an injection of the typhoid virus, aren’t they going to come down with the disease?

When the AIDs epidemic hit, conservatives and right-wingers were quite properly outraged when the governments of the West refused to close down the gay theaters and bathhouses. “Isn’t it just common sense,” the conservatives argued, “to minimize the spread of a disease by destroying the breeding grounds for the disease?” But the powers that were, and are, could not bring themselves to discriminate against sodomites.

And yet the same conservative, who can look at life realistically enough to advocate the closing of the AIDs breeding grounds, would look on someone who advocated shutting down the whole educational establishment from grade school through college, including the surrogates for the academy, our churches, as mad.

I am such a madman. Originally our colleges were the churches, in that they were founded by different Christian sects to further their versions of the faith. The Lutherans had their colleges, the Baptists theirs, the Catholics theirs, and so on. But gradually, every single college founded by a Christian denomination became the ardent advocate for the religion of that guy with the horns and the tail. And the colleges extended their influence to their parent churches. So why should a parent be surprised when his children come back from college or church with academic AIDs? In most cases, the disease is fatal, although there have been some miracle cures….”

For more, see:
An Unreasonable Proposal

Wow,so much negativity on this subject. I will leave a brief comment.
Growing up in San Diego I had these problems with woman as well.
It seemed no matter how hard i tried,i could not find one either,worthy,or willing to be with me due to my beliefs and at the time,new found standards. It seemed to me that all of the White girls were purely interested in material things,flings,parties,minority men etc.whenever i did find someone,they soon discovered I was a working stiff,who drove an old car! oh no!

So to the point. I left,and as i had previously experienced,white woman in other parts of the country,were not AS bad! I found A young girl who wanted nothing more than a family. We hit it off,married,and now have two children.

i work,she stays at home,and we both love it this way. i taught her about our peoples main enemies and at first she was reluctant. Not just about the Jews,but about all of it,everything she learned was now being questioned in her own mind.

She truly believes like I do. Every day I challenge her to do more research. To verify,since we younger adults so quickly and easily forget and become distracted by trivial garbage.

I was lucky though,her parents taught her well. Were proud of theyre ancestry,lived by decent morals and higher standards. All of this made her that much more open to racial pride and prosperity.

Is she subservient,no. Is she dominant,again no. She balances our relationship and provides the nurturing femininity nature provided her with.