3 December, 2008

News Columnist vs. SPLC

Posted by Socrates in 'anti-Semitism', 'hate', jewed culture, media, Socrates, SPLC at 10:32 pm | Permanent Link

A columnist calls the Southern Poverty Law Center a “clever scam”:

[Article].


  • 9 Responses to “News Columnist vs. SPLC”

    1. Susan Says:
      4 December, 2008 at 2:19 am

      Wow. At least it’s nice to see the truth about these kikes and kike-alikes in writing for a change. Hopefully, a lot of folks will read it and investigate further. Well, okay…….so a few people will do it.

      We should all shoot this guy an email thanking him for writing this.

    2. jim donaldson Says:
      4 December, 2008 at 9:23 am

      I commented, letting him know how sorry I was that his career was over.

    3. Last White American Says:
      4 December, 2008 at 12:07 pm

      He quoted from a article by the New York Jew who calls himself “Nicholas Stix”, posted on VDARE. Even though it was written by a fellow jew, the slimy, hook-nosed editors at the Baltimore Sun refused to provide a citation or link since VDARE is on the jews’ hate list, maintained by the SPLC.

      Here is the quotation with the link, which couldn’t be found in Google:

      As columnist and blogger Nicholas Stix notes, “The questions are, of course, rhetorical. Mrs. Pietrzak-Varga obviously knows full well why her son and daughter-in-law were murdered.”

      The Winchester Atrocity: Down The MSM Memory Hole While Cops Claim It’s Not A “Racial Crime” By Nicholas Stix.

      http://www.vdare.com/stix/081124_atrocity.htm

    4. Coup d'Etat Says:
      4 December, 2008 at 1:05 pm

      Wow is right. It’s a relief to see someone on the outside reporting the truth for change on the lowlife kikery that is permeating throughout our society like a disease.

      The facts are there and have been for many years. The SPLC are nothing but typical kike swindlers, no different than the Wall Street bunch and the kike investors robbing people from their hard-earned money. Every lawsuit they bring they bring with trickery and threats if they don’t win and the judges fall to their whim every time.

      With the economy crashing the way it is and millions are losing money, many more will be coming out of the woodwork against the kikes. The kikes have a long history of swindling the Americans since the well-known 1929 crash. The kikes will not have power over anyone when people see how they have been taken advantage of again and with their finances and lives in general ruined.

      No more SPLC, ADL, JWC, B’nai B’rith and other kikery scams. They will all be vanished. This will come to pass and will happen much sooner than ten years.

      Can anyone guess where and what the bailout money is doing for certain businesses and for the cozy friends in Washington? What is the money really preparing them for?

    5. Zarathustra Says:
      4 December, 2008 at 6:41 pm

      Unlike creepy old Bradley Smith, this particular Smith has a nice, honest face. I am also in total agreement with him. If there were more writers like him in America’s newspapers, I ‘m sure those papers would not be in the well-deserved financial trouble they are in now.

    6. Susan Says:
      4 December, 2008 at 9:13 pm

      You are absolutely right zara. Newspapers are shooting themselves in the foot by catering to the muds and their ilk instead of to the newspaper reading public which just so happens to be the White folks. Just as it’s always been.

      Duh!!!

      What’s wrong with the editors of these papers who can’t see this? Are they stupid or just so obsessed with their own sense of self importance that they can’t see how what they are doing is bringing about their own downfall?

      Newspapers, like the Republican Party, seem to be on a one way track to self destruction, and there doesn’t seem to be anything they are willing to do to change their direction. How stupid and short sighted for the both of them.

    7. Zarathustra Says:
      4 December, 2008 at 10:14 pm

      Well said, Susan. Forgive my earlier mysogynistic comments. Human beings and human sexuality are so incomprehensible (at least to me), that I can’t help joking about them. But always in a PG-13 manner, of course.

    8. Susan Says:
      5 December, 2008 at 9:07 am

      Zara: No problemo. There are some things I wish I could take back that are out there on the internet. It happens.

    9. Stronza Says:
      5 December, 2008 at 12:06 pm

      Have you read any of his other columns?

      http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/opinion/oped/bal-op.smith29oct29,0,2859690.column

      Hope this link works. I don’t know how to test it here, what with my noncomputer mind.