12 December, 2008

Israel’s Law of Return Cited in Court

Posted by Socrates in Israel, Israel - the facts, Israel's Law of Return, Jewish arrogance, Jewish chosenness, jewish criminality, Poland, Socrates at 1:26 pm | Permanent Link

This is a sound legal argument. Israel is a haven for Jewish criminals who flee from prosecution – a great example of that being the notorious Solomon – a.k.a. Salomon – Morel, who fled to Israel in 1992:

[Article].

More about Morel: [Here].


  • 13 Responses to “Israel’s Law of Return Cited in Court”

    1. Stronza Says:

      What a terrific post, Socrates. There’s all kinds of other good reading on the seanbryson site – have a look at “Barack Obama”. I know some wns don’t have anything good to say about Thomas Sowell, but I like his information & statements on slavery. Why the hell is a learned black man telling us these things instead of one of our own?? Boy, we are the duds of the universe when it comes to looking after our own interests, aren’t we.

    2. Marwinsing Says:

      This bizarre faith (which is really just based upon the jew’s unhealthy and insecure sense of ego, as in ‘who/what am I?’) must eventually initiate their own undoing – sooner or later – whilst the rest of humanity quietly, patiently waits, twiddling it’s thumbs… and yeah, great post Socrates, says much about The Jewish Week publication too – laughable, really.

    3. shabbos s. shabazz Says:

      Sailer on Sowell:

      Unfortunately, the title essay, “Black Rednecks and White Liberals,” is the most questionable in the book.

      Yet it features many acute observations. For example:

      “By cheering on counterproductive attitudes, making excuses for self-defeating behavior, and promoting the belief that ‘racism’ accounts for most of blacks’ problems, white intellectuals serve their own psychic, ideological, and political interests. They are the kinds of friends who can do more harm than enemies.”

      The central conceit of the essay: blacks’ troubles today in large part stem from their having absorbed the self-defeating culture of poor Southern whites. (Sailer comment)

      http://www.vdare.com/sailer/050515_redneck.htm

      Sowell is Milton & Rose Friedman Scholar at Hoover (Stanford)
      Absolute neo-con establishment all-the-way. He denies that niggers are born inferior.

    4. Stronza Says:

      “interesting” info on Sowell, Shabazz! I used to suscribe to a Canadian rightwing magazine that had occasional arts. by T. Sowell, and at least at that time I found nothing there to bother me.

      But why a neocon would expose the African & Jewish origins of North American slavery, I don’t know. In any case, it is pretty stupid to say that blacks have the problems that they do because they copied it from poor whites. Personally, I have known a few blacks (REAL blacks, no racemixing in their parents’ past), fairly well-behaved, no criminality (tho the men were always going after white women), with good jobs, who are contemptuous of blacks who can’t get it together. For what that is worth. Not much, I guess…

    5. shabbos s. shabazz Says:

      “. . .Personally, I have known a few blacks. . .”

      The prime issue is blacks qua the black gene pool, not blacks qua individual blacks. We are looking at crime rates per thousand, inventions/achievements per million, etcetera- what good/bad emanates from each group.

      Individual outliers (exceptions) are interesting, but not germane to our objectives.

      It’z the law of large numbers. For example, insurance companies know fairly closely how many will break a leg in a year, but do not know which person will break a leg. Likewise, we can know how many blacks will commit a felony, without knowing which one.

      The key idea is RATES. Rates per thousand, per hundred- thousand, and so on.

    6. Slow-Liberal-Death Says:

      Quote from the article:

      “In addition, the defense lawyers said
      that by denying Rubashkin bail, the
      court was denying him the constitutional
      right to equal protection.

      “Jews are a protected class for Equal
      Protection purposes,” they wrote.
      “Thus, singling Jews out in any way
      when determining bail is unconstitutional… ”

      He he. “Jews are a protected class”. Not for much longer.

    7. Terrorsaurus Says:

      Some protected classes are more equal than others.

      Doesn’t this stupid goyim judge know that Jews are above the laws of us mere cattle?

      Flight risk? More like flight certainty.

      Israel: always there to make sure Jews never have to face the music, itz. And also why crime always pays if you’re a Jew.

    8. Doug Says:

      @shabbos, that gets me wondering if actuaries might more naturally gravitate to a more racial attitude since their job requires them to see things in groups, and see reality as it is rather than what others want it to be.

    9. jim donaldson Says:

      Maybe this guy could use it:

      http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/12/13/business/fraud.php

    10. shabbos s. shabazz Says:

      Sounds reasonable, the actuary’s numbers involve the real world, with lots of money consequences.

      btw I once read a survey of job contentment. Actuaries were at the top. Second was vnn moderator.

    11. shabbos s. shabazz Says:

      Sounds reasonable, the actuary’s numbers involve the real world, with lots of money consequences.

      btw I once read a survey of job contentment. Actuaries were at the top. Second was vnn moderator.

    12. Osama bin Laden Says:

      This actually makes sense. Israel refuses to extradite Jewish criminals back to the USA.

      The fact that Israel knowingly harbors fugitives makes any Jew a flight risk.

      Lock ’em up.

    13. Zarathustra Says:

      Once again, the Jews’ sneaky little tricks (like the Law of Return) have come back to bite them on the tookas!