Deliberate Deception
Posted by Socrates in jews, Socrates, William Pierce at 4:00 pm | 
Permanent Link
by Dr. William Pierce.
“Hello!
In our weekly discussions here I sometimes use careless language which leads to misunderstanding, and when I do I’m sorry for it. The problem is that I really have a great deal of work to do, and I usually don’t have time to refine and polish my remarks before I go on the air, and so sometimes I don’t make myself as clear as I might. One listener criticized last week’s broadcast because I referred to Ayn Rand as a “Soviet Jewess” who preached a religion of selfishness. He wrote to me that that was like saying that Ayn Rand was a believer in both communism and in self-reliance and individualism at the same time, and that didn’t make sense.
Actually, my reference to Ayn Rand as a “Soviet Jewess” was intended to mean only that she was a Jewess from the Soviet Union, not that she was an apostle of communism. Unlike many of her fellow Jews at the time, she did not preach communism. She was, however, an apostle not only of selfishness but also of other destructive ideas preached by nearly all of her fellow Jews, such as the idea that race doesn’t matter. In her book The Virtue of Selfishness, after railing vehemently and at length against what she called “collectivism,” she wrote, and I quote, “Racism is the lowest, most crudely primitive form of collectivism.” — end quote — Furthermore, Ayn Rand’s brand of selfishness was a far cry from the sort of self-reliance and individual responsibility in which I believe. The atomistic sort of selfishness she preached was intended — again I say intended — to sever a person from his racial roots, to kill his feeling for his race, to lead him to put his personal interests above his responsibilities to his race as a whole, and, in fact, to abjure his racial responsibilities altogether. And this was deliberate.”
The rest is [Here]. (For the audio version, go [Here] and scroll down to 12-18-1999).
31 December, 2008 at 4:31 pm
“Racism is the lowest, most crudely primitive form of collectivism.”
I disagree, the family is. Certainly no one thinks a family unit is a bad thing, well unless you’re a deranged Jewess like Rand.
Whether it is collectivism, individualism, or any other ism, the Jew teaches destruction in every form.
31 December, 2008 at 7:37 pm
There is no real differnce between what Ayn Rand preached and what Karl Marx or Leon Trotsky, Theodore Hertzl or Milton Freidman or any other Jew preaches……It’s all of a piece. A Jewish piece.
31 December, 2008 at 8:00 pm
Ayn Rand wrote a eulogy to rich and powerful money Jews with her Magnus Opus – Atlas Shrugged. And her ideology was used to dupe goy. Most Rand hypnotized brain dead ideologues have been hoodwinked.
“According to a short description of Objectivism given by Ayn Rand in 1962, “The ideal political-economic system is laissez-faire capitalism … In a system of full capitalism, there should be (but, historically, has not yet been) a complete separation of state and economics, in the same way and for the same reasons as the separation of state and church.”
http://www.wowowow.com/post/greenspan-shrugged-did-ayn-rand-cause-our-financial-crisis-128286
Who benefits in a system where the rich can do whatever they please without the interference of “the people?” Who but a Jew would conceive of such a system? A “separation” from the state – meaning a separation of “THE PEOPLE” and economy that controls their flow of goods and money? Then economics and those that control and minipulate “the economy” have no responsibility to anyone anywhere.
This proves that objectivist philosophy is first a Jewish abstract construct and its purpose is to rationalize the total exploitation of people, which are the only thing that can make up a “State,” for the selfish interest of the few Jews at the top. Rand very cunningly played on the Kwas hatred of the government to advance her tribe. A prolific and creative writer she produced an ideology that would eventually remove any and all authority that would stand between the people and those wishing to exploit them. Just look around. If the purpose of Government is to stand between the people and those that would degrade and exploit them then the Objectivist view point is only anarchy at worst and Money in charge -“Democracy” at best, therefore, to refer to Rand as the Bolshevik Jewess might be more apropos.
31 December, 2008 at 9:45 pm
Rand’s ‘philosophy’ is for the stupid Amerikwan goyim not for her fellow Jews. Israel is still a National Socialist Ethnocracy where the interests of the Jew tribe are placed above any sort of individual interest.
1 January, 2009 at 5:08 am
That’s right, Zionism is the Jews’ perverted, mutilated version of German National Socialism. The Jews secretly admire Uncle Adolf and the gang and wish they could be Aryans, too.
1 January, 2009 at 10:07 am
Pierce’s essay is, as are most of them, very eye-opening. I can’t say what first opened my eyes, but I do know Pierce had the most effectual means of communicating the truth.
Ayn Rand. When I first read her, I swallowed her schpiel right down, like most teenagers. After a year or two, however, I began to question certain things, such as her complete disconnectedness from reality, ie, she begins everything from “tabula rasa”, not allowing for genetics, physics, etc. Her conclusions are based on her premises, in a circular redundancy, with no beginning. “Individualism” is her god, an assumed pre-existent like any other god, and those who don’t believe are going to hell! Kevin MacDonald addresses this rabbinic messaianic attitude in TCOC.
Families don’t exist in her world. Children are not their parents offspring, meant to carry on the family, but are individual ends-in-themselves. Corporations (which are, oddly enough, creatures of the “government interference” she so abhores, and in no way what Adam Smith had in mind at all) are NOT collectivist enterprises, but families are, in her world.
Look at reality: What would happen if there were NO corporations? What would happen if there were NO families (I mean this biologically!). The answers tell you which is real, and which is not.
1 January, 2009 at 2:06 pm
The Jews’ Weltanschaung is very dark and grim indeed.
1 January, 2009 at 11:23 pm
Alisa Rosenbaum
;-)
1 January, 2009 at 11:30 pm
Maybe Ms. ‘Rand’ was driven by the proverbial ‘selfish gene’, which is a common genetic trait of her co-racialists?
2 January, 2009 at 11:04 pm
In an interview she did on Donahue not long before she died Rand was asked where she stood regarding the arabs vs. Israel and she, without hesitation, said she sided with Israel which she claimed represented rationality and civilization. The audience, packed with jews and shabbas goyim, applauded wildly and pussy Donahue didn’t contradict her.
3 January, 2009 at 2:37 am
And how old was that Jew bitch Rand when Satan finally called her home? 160? 175? Isn’t that the average Jew life expectancy?