Vanguard News Network

“Therefore we must hold our tongues”

Not saying something also involves free speech. Ordinarily, “free speech” is political term. It denies censorship, and censorship is a term applying ONLY to government.

When a private entity blocks speech, or a book store refuses to sell certain literature, it is often called “censorship”, even though no coercive state action occurs. I am aware of no word that describes this non-governmental quasi-censorship.

Blightblingdouche: “There is one exception to the benefits of free speech in the virtual world of racialism and that is speech related to Christianity.”

You mean judeo-christardianity?

“Christians outnumber us.”

That is a lot of good genetic material we can’t afford to let the enemy have.

“We can count on truth insulting some Christian somewhere, somehow.”

Darwin is the biggest insult; depending on how hard they want to thump the Bumble.

“Insult a Christian with the truth and we lose.”

The judeo-christards are lemmings. You can never really expect a lemming, of any stripe, to accept, or even process, “the truth”. Just ain’t in the cards – sans eugenics. But we can’t do eugenics because we are not in power.

“Therefore we must hold our tongues and fingers, even for something as benign as Christianity’s geographical origins…”

Everyone is perfectly well aware of its geographic origins. It is the fleshed out implications of that which could be a doosey for the judeo-christards.

“…or to note its failure to stand as a bulwark against jews,”

Classical Liberalism, Constitutionalism, Monarchy, Feudalism, even, arguable, the evolved level of ethnocentrism of the White man, have failed as bulwarks.

“…for the sake of a non-existent “unity” in the virtual world and ultimate “victory” in the real world.”

Of course there will be no ultimate victory in the real world without some degree of unity, but, at present, we are not in a position to manufacture a consensus, NS style, via control of the centers of indoctrination (television, radio, Internet, education system, etc.). Presently, the Jews control those; and have brainwashed liberal do-gooders and shabbos goys to do it for them.

“How do you like them apples, folks?”

It depends on how the person you are trying to convince to adopt racialism feels about being called a judeo-christard who worships one of many flea-bitten kike “prophets” who were crawling around like ants in the Middle East at that time. I don’t suspect it would go over very well. Preaching to and debating with the converted is fine – if it helps clarify issues, refine strategies and reaffirm unity – but the point is to eventually spread the message to a critical mass of people to effect the desired change. Different strokes for different folks: apologetics consistent with racialism for judeo-christards. Trust me, I’ve found out from experience, debating the lemmings at Toilet Mag, when you go after their faith in Jebarb, they dig in their heels. What really messes with their heads is when you use scriptural justifications for racism and anti-semitism.

“Is there merit to this viewpoint?”

If you try to convert a man who is over-weight and is from a rural area to the cause by calling him a “fat cracker” it ain’t gonna fly – self-evidently.

On-line is where we try to hammer out solutions and educate the lemmings – that requires a bit more latitude than we are afforded in the real.

If we don’t have freedom speech then we’re effectively intellectual slaves. Unfortunately many people have willingly accepted their enslavement.

The culture of Christianity will stay whether we like it or not – and by rights it should – it gives those people who need it something to hang on to and it does have some moral good points for those who’ve lost touch with their instincts like the lemmings. Christianity binds white people together by blood – or it should (remember it’s ancestral) and yeah, we here all know that it’s the Christard’s heads that need adjusting – and not necessarily the religion. E. Michael Jones seems to have it pretty well wrapped up. Christianity is the European White Man’s religion and none of us are going to change that. Now one could advocate assassinating The Pope (or John Hagee for that matter) but we need to tread a bit more carefully and not knock the religion (which only plays into the hand of the jew) but gently kick the Christard lemmings into line. As Bob Whitaker says, it’s all Wordism. But we mustn’t forget the centuries of spadework that whites poured into this religion (or cult) and lastly, we white men are embodiments of The Christ figure, whether he was a jew, a sandnigger or a Martian for that matter. What is inalienable is that Christianity goes hand in hand with Western Civilisation, it is the bedrock of our ancestry and culture. Let’s rather work with it and of course this is all open to interpretation. My viewpoint? I think a few priest’s heads need to be kicked in but I shan’t dwell on that rather help in kicking the goddamned bloody flock into place again because right now it’s, for the most part, lost in the wilderness. Religion’s like a plant. Feed it goodess and it will grow. Piss on it and it will die. And the fucking priests have been pissing on it of late by turning into a multiculti free-for-all sham. Christianity is for Whites only. And ONLY Whites.