30 October, 2008
Australia’s Internet Censorship Plan
Posted by Socrates in Australia, censorship, Internet, Socrates, white nationalism, White Nationalists at 10:20 pm | 
Permanent Link
This type of censorship would significantly hinder the WN movement in Australia by making the study of nationalist issues much more difficult:
30 October, 2008 at 11:15 pm
Why not? They’ve already taken almost every other white man’s right to make adult decisions about drugs tobacco, the amount one can drink, seat belts, insurance, helmets, firearms, hell you cannot even ride a bike without being helmeted and tagged. So why should the nanny government allow any freedom on the web? Why shouldn’t they censor the “adult” content on the web? Why shouldn’t they take yet another step at infantilizing the white man to the point where he won’t even be able to wipe his own ass without a court appointed nanny to make sure he does it according to government specifications? Isn’t it a little late to start protesting the restrictions on what toys one is allowed to play with while sitting in the nanny state’s playpen?
31 October, 2008 at 12:23 am
Folks! Derrick MacThomas on his latest internet radio show stated that Alex Jones is really okay and spot about the insurance fraund and mass murder in NYC a several years back.
Can he be that stupid or perhaps I am getting the the feeling of NKVD stinker IMO
31 October, 2008 at 12:43 am
Here’s a way we can help out our friends in Australia:
Anyone with a rudimentary knowledge of networking can set up a proxy server using an old computer, Linux and a broadband connection.
Once we do that, all we’d need to do is get the IP address of the proxy to our friends in Australia and they can view anything they want and the Australian government won’t know a thing.
If by chance the proxy were to reside in a place that had Wi- Fi, the proxy server would be anonymous.
31 October, 2008 at 2:21 am
They’ve probably left porn untouched though, am I right? Internet porn is a tool of the NWO/JWO, Internet White Nationalism isn’t.
Idiot Aussies voting in the Labour Party Reds.
31 October, 2008 at 2:54 am
It is interesting to note that the Jews want to censor sites which promote Anorexia, a psychological eating disorder, rather than inter racial orgies. Maybe the typical holocaust (typhus) victim looks a little bit too plump and well-fed compared to the underfed skinny teenage girls of Australia and the Jews see them as competition in eliciting sympathy from the gullible goyim.
31 October, 2008 at 5:12 am
I see Australia is joining Europe in the quest to ban all things that the jews deem offensive. That it has yet to happen in the US on a similar scale is impressive, though perhaps they consider us the most apathetic of the lot. A few choice Mencken quotes come to mind.
It appears that “Fat” is the new “Thin,” zoomcopter, as I’m reminded of each time I set foot in a jewpermarket. Ah well, as Eric Thomson once said, the fatter and uglier the country gets, the more fit and handsome I appear!
31 October, 2008 at 5:32 am
Idiot Aussies voting in the Labour Party Reds…..the i/net censorship plan had already been drafted & was ‘ready-2-go’ courtesy of the previous ZOG…the ‘Coalition Party’…..a more repulsive cabal of kikez & kike-enablers u could not find….they were also responsible for almost totally dis-arming Australia & leaving the average Aussie @ the tender mercies of gangsters, thugz, hoonz & psychopathic mud-people!
ta! Johnny!
the ‘Labor Party’ knows it is “on notice” wrt certain issues especially fire-arms laws….it controls pretty much every state & territory government & the Commonwealth Government because of extremely PISSED OFF & dis-gruntled ex-firearm owners!
if it gets too “antsy” on these & other issues, then IT CAN be FLUSHED DOWN THE SEWER @ “a rate of knots” just like the previous ZOG was!
31 October, 2008 at 10:45 am
I guess the Internet is just supposed to be for buying stuff and reading “official” information, nothing more.
31 October, 2008 at 12:09 pm
They let the Jews take their guns after the Mossad bloodbath at Port Arthur.
Fatal mistake.
Australia, like England & Canada, is toast.
31 October, 2008 at 2:27 pm
All our friends in Australia really ought to get to know
http://ibypass.net/
31 October, 2008 at 6:25 pm
>>I am surfing now using Anonymizer, with a fake IP number.
31 October, 2008 at 6:29 pm
The rest of my post disappeared, see if this link shows:
http://www.boston.com/business/technology/articles/2006/02/20/beating_censorship_on_the_internet/
31 October, 2008 at 7:00 pm
“But the Australian Christian Lobby yesterday welcomed the Government’s proposals.”
1 November, 2008 at 3:23 am
“But the Australian Christian Lobby yesterday welcomed the Government’s proposals.
Its managing director Jim Wallace said he expected resistance from the industry but the measures were needed.
‘The need to prevent access to illegal hard-core material and child pornography must be placed above the industry’s desire for unfettered access,’ Mr Wallace said.”
Can this guy possibly be that naive or shortsighted? If Christians support government censorship of the Internet, what’ll happen next is that any Christian sites critical of, say, homosexuality, feminism, or abortion, will get filtered out right along with the porn they want banned (and it’s actually very unlikely that any porn would get banned anyways).
BTW, can someone fill me in on what these “controversial” sites about anorexia are all about? I take it the euthanasia ones tell people how to kill themselves (as if banning a website is going to prevent people from figuring out how to take their own lives), but the anorexia I don’t get.
1 November, 2008 at 6:23 am
I’ll bet you this Australian Christian Lobby guy, Jim Wallace, is an avid viewer of online homo porn. Just another uptight Christian hypocrite, I’ll wager.
5 November, 2008 at 4:53 am
“But the Australian Christian Lobby yesterday welcomed the Government’s proposals.”
It’s not doing anything with regard to mass pornography. What’s he welcoming? Looks like yet another controlled Christian “opposition” group.
Christian sites which are anti-Jew or anti-feminist (e.g. Real Jew News or Save The Males) would be first on the cutting block (i.e. not the “euthanasia and anorexia” smokescreen that Jew media has provided).