29 September, 2008

Austrian Election: Far-Right Gets 29% of Vote

Posted by Socrates in Austria, elections, Europe, Iran, Israel, politics at 6:05 pm | Permanent Link

The far-right will make big political gains during the next decade as non-White immigrants flood into Europe: [Article].

About Israel and the Austrian election: [Article].


  • 8 Responses to “Austrian Election: Far-Right Gets 29% of Vote”

    1. Zarathustra Says:

      OK, so the the far-right Freedom Party wins a large number of seats in the Austrian Bundestag or whatever. Is that necessarily good? We don’t need any more cowardly right-wing reactionaries in office, people who will cave in at the first sign of well-organized enemy opposition……Revolutionaries, not Reactionaries, are what’s needed.

    2. Hans Schneider Says:

      God bless Austria !

    3. JDEE Says:

      Suppport for members of nationalist parties, e.g. the Freedom Party doubled during the latest Austrian elections according to http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7641441.stm.

      Before the World Wars, the territory now called Austria was inhabited by a civilized and brilliant people, who had a government that cared about the survival of the Austrian nation. Are the results of the most recent Austrian election a sign that not all traditional Austrians have died, or been brainwashed by anti-Aryan post-war hate propaganda?

      Do some Austrians fear that higher crime rates will be imported, along with the cheap labor of third world nations? Do some Austrians suspect that neither Europe nor humanity would benefit if European countries like Austria are gradually transformed into ones like Zimbabwee via immigration? Is it racist to believe that humanity is more likely to benefit if Europe remains the homeland of people of European ancestry?

      Are the anti-nationalist reader comments posted at http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7641441.stm so uniform and “politically correct” because they were written by one person? Do BBC censors cherry-pick reader comments, and post only those that support Blair-like opinions? If so, do BBC censors enjoy wasting the time of writers who disagree with them?

    4. Zarathustra Says:

      Der Fuhrer had a lot of problems living in the old Hapsburg Empire and would not register for the draft in the Austro-Hungarian Army. That’s why he fled to Bavaria. Point being that pre-WWI Austria-Hungary was not the racial paradise for Whites that the poster above seems to believe it was. Jews ran the show and there were Gypsies and Moslem Turks all over the place, too. At least the Germanic and Slavic people in Austria-Hungary were virulently anti-Jew, much more so than in Deustchland.

    5. Celtic Warrior Says:

      Let’s hope the fighting spirit of Prinz Eugen is still with Austria.

    6. gw Says:

      “Pre-WWI Austria-Hungary was not the racial paradise for Whites that the poster above seems to believe it was. Jews ran the show and there were Gypsies and Moslem Turks all over the place, too. …That’s why he fled to Bavaria.”

      Exactly! He despised that multi-culti jungle and blamed all Germany’s ills upon it.

    7. Cpt. Candor Says:

      “At least the Germanic and Slavic people in Austria-Hungary were virulently anti-Jew, much more so than in Deustchland.”

      And thus I recall the sob story of one jew who stated that the kind of race-conciousness that took years to cultivate in Deustchland seemed to appear overnight in Austria once it was incorporated into the Third Reich.

    8. gw Says:

      People in that multi-culti empire had more experience with them than in Germany — and other minorities too. The Jews, even by WW2, were still no more than 1% in Germany. Yet, they controlled almost everything.

      I once met an elderly Jew who HATED all Poles with a passion. He flatly told me that all Poles were born with Jew-hatred in them; that they were natural enemies of Jews — just lIke cats and dogs. I scoffed at that, but he INSISTED and he would not back down.