Vanguard News Network

Nature deals in INEQUALITY, if it didn’t evolution would come to a halt.

quote: No genetic data has ever shown that one group of people is inherently superior to another. Equality is a moral value central to the idea of human rights;

ams: And that is the central absurdity of it all. Liberals themselves seem to hold the position that equality before the law is based on the presumption of biological equality. Thus, what should be a purely empirical question–do people have the same genes or not?–is repositioned as a “moral value.” It would be as though people who lived before Magellan sailed around the world argued that the flat earth was a “moral value” and that no one had actually sailed “around” the world to disprove it, while ignoring all other contrary data. In the case at hand, while specific genes that contribute to human inequality may not have been firmly identified, phenotypic inequalities with mearsurable heritabilities, sometimes quite high heritabilities, have been observed and measured repeatedly.

Quote: Those that share the same culture, language or location tend to have different genetic variations than other groups.

ams: *Except* for genes that contribute to differences in human abilities–those genes are exempt from inter-group variability; and that is an article of faith which, if you express doubts about, you are immoral and heretical.

quote: This is becoming less true, though, as populations mix.

ams: That is an assumption, but recent evidence indicates that different populations are continuing to move apart genetically at an accelerating rate.

quote: Studies looking for health disparities between individuals shouldn’t rely solely on this identity.

ams: Just as they should not rely “solely” on the patient’s family history; but does tnat mean his family history should be ignored?

quote: Social definitions of what it means to be “Hispanic” or “black” have changed over time. People who claim the same race may actually have very different genetic histories.

ams: Yes, they *may*, but usually not. And including “Hispanic” in this example is highly misleading. “Hispanic” has never referred to a race. That would be like using “Americans” as an example of a race.

quote: Trying to use genetic differences between groups to show differences in intelligence, violent behaviors or the ability to throw a ball is an oversimplification of much more complicated interactions between genetics and environment.

ams: No, it’s not, geneticists do not oversimplify; they do not say “genes only explain behavior.” A total straw man. And isn’t it interesting that when social scientists or others really do resort to environmental explanations unmodified by genetic considerations that no one ever accuses the environmental determinsts of “oversimplification” or warns us against using environmental differences between groups to explain differences in intelligence or behavior?

quote: Researchers should be careful about using racial groups when designing experiments

ams: Because it might result in unwelcome discoveries!

quote: Overemphasising genetics may promote racist views or focus attention on a group when it should be on the individual.

ams: Because their ideological obsession with the fiction of racial equality is their primary concern, not your health.

quote: The study of genetics requires cooperation between experts in many different fields

ams: I don’t disagree with this statement, but I do note that they never say this about the study of the social sciences, even though it is no less true there, and even though interdisciplinary contributions that includes genetics is far more lacking in the social sciences than the other way around.

quote: Oversimplified science feeds popular misconceptions

ams: Yes–the popular misconception that “all men are created equal.”

quote: Genetics 101 should include a history of racism

Any high school or college student learning about genetics should also learn about misguided attempts in the past to use science to justify racism.

ams: Because misguided attempts to ignore or distort science in order to suppress popular knowledge of racial differences has been much more common and much more successful, it is far more important for students to learn of those attempts in their genetics classes.
quote: The Stanford group didn’t always agree when coming up with these ideas. Predictably enough, the biomedical scientists tended to think of race in neutral, clinical terms; the social scientists and scholars of the humanities argued that concepts of race cannot be washed clean of their cultural and historical legacies.

ams: Yes, because political activists long ago infiltrated the social sciences and humanities with the goal of acting as Marxist “change agents.”

quote: But both groups, according to the letter, recognise the power of the gene in the public imagination and the historical dangers of its misrepresentation as deterministic and immutable.

ams: Once again, what about “the historical dangers of” misrepresenting environmental influences “as deterministic and immutable?” That has been far more common and its consequences far more severe, yet, as usual the social scientists and humanities professors exempt themselves from scrutiny.

–ams
http://www.thecivicplatform.com/2008/07/23/ten-commandments-of-race-and-genetics-issued/

This article is the definitive proof that multiculturalism is a religion and not a belief system set in reality. Are we to believe that we should start research on sickle cell anemia in whites? Are we to ignore that marathons are almost always won by west africans? This is unscientific garbage, and is a mirror to the inquisition.

This psychosis, and fantasy belief is so ingrained in so many people that we will have to wipe the slate clean one day, and we must do that before they succeed in infecting our minds with this false belief destroying our will, and impregnate our women with their dna, destroying our genes.

Gypsy thieves questioned
BY ANDREI YUSTSCHINSKY
SENIOR NWI GYPSY OBSERVER | Friday, July 25, 2008

HAMMOND | Police are hailing a Wednesday traffic stop with bringing them their first major breakthrough toward stopping a rash of thefts from senior citizens which began last year.

More than three dozen robberies or attempted robberies of elderly residents in their homes committed by men claiming to be utility or service workers have been reported in Hammond and surrounding communities since December.

In each reported instance, an individual purporting to be a water department, gas, electric or other employee enters a senior citizen’s home, and then distracts the resident while partners sneak in and ransack the house for cash and valuables. These are the oldest bag of tricks Gypsies have been using on their non-Gypsy White European host populations for hundreds of years.

Police on Wednesday stopped a red late-model Pontiac sedan at the corner of 165th Street and Calumet Avenue shortly after noon on reports that the men inside had been offering gas station patrons the use of their credit card for purchases in exchange for cash.

The four men in the car appeared to be “mestizos” but were fast talkers like big city small time con-artist Jews, police said, but were actually of “Eastern European heritage” with residency in “eastern” Calumet City. Each reportedly carried a walkie-talkie radio.

Local victims of the distraction robbers have described the thieves as “looking Latino,” and reported how the group’s frontman talks into a mobile radio or cellular telephone in a language which is not English or a mestizo brand of debauched Spanish.

“Pawn shop receipts” (people who purchace stolen merchandice) for jewelry also were found in the car, police said.

The FBI classifies these Gypsy distraction burglaries committed against the elderly as one of the most common variety of gypsy cons, named after a group of people who migrated to Europe from the Indian subcontinent during the Middle Ages and who were virtually kicked out (like that other wandering tribe) there during the National Socialist pogroms of the 1940s. At least these Gypsies are not responsible for all the wars of the world as Mel Gibson has quoted, forced miscegenation, homosexuality and holoco$t myths and claims on the world White population like the Ashkenazi and Sephardic Jews are. As far as i know, i have never heard of any Gypsy who has ever moved up in the world in any positions of government, media, religious or political power on any large scale in the White world and that’s good. The only thing thing i can say good about the Gypsies is they do not like Jews, but still Gypsies are born thieves and con-artists, genetically that’s just their nature.

Dark haired, dark eyed, swarthy, greasy, these Gypsies — who now-a-days refer to themselves as “Rom” or “Roma” — arrived in North America in the early 1900s, and today number around 1 million, according to law enforcement gypsologists.

The FBI reports that many family groupings of Rom Gypsies make their livings through retail theft, home-improvement fraud, “lonely hearts” scams, and distraction burglaries — mostly committed against senior citizens.

Nearly all of the local victims in the recent series of robberies are 80 or older, and many have lost their life’s savings through thefts of $10,000 or more.

The men questioned on Wednesday had names (aka or also-known-as) commonly associated with people of Rom descent such as Miller, Ristich, Stevens, Bimbo, Alexander, etc. police said.

Because no credit card was found, the men were released. But police photographed them and their vehicle, and documented the “pawn shop receipts” for future reference.

Hammond detectives and their counterparts in other communities with similar reported robberies — including East Chicago, Highland, Munster, Merrillville and Portage, and the Illinois suburbs of Berwyn, Oak Lawn and Western Springs — have been working on a multijurisdictional approach to solving their cases since May.

Information gained from Wednesday’s traffic stop could go a long way toward stopping the crime spree, Hammond Police Chief Brian Miller said.

“I have been a lawman for 18 years, and in all that time these are the first ‘Gypsies’ I have ever encountered,” Miller (not a Gypsy) said. “Sometimes it pays to get my lunch ‘to go.'”

Miller reminded residents that all city employees and legitimate utility workers carry official identification and will show it on demand, and he recommends calling 911 if a suspicious mestizo looking person comes to their door.

The Hammond Police Department Web site, www. HammondPolice.com, features a map which tracks reported attacks by the thieves over the past eight months.

Anyone with information about the gang is asked to call Detective Michael Daniels at (219) 852-2961 or Detective Steve Guernsey at (219) 852-2978.
Copywrong © 2008 nwi.com

Andrei Yustschinsky reporting from “on the spot & in the parking lot” at the Hammond Police Department, Hammond, Indiana, 46320

Original politically correct story here…..
http://www.nwitimes.com/articles/2008/07/25/news/lake_county/docb988a420a8fbd5968625749000800a4d.txt

I couldn’t agree more with Blightblingywingydoorag’s statement “In each situation, the inner conflict between moral conditioning and reality led to hesitation or poor choices, resulting in the victim’s death.” How very true! It is within that exact moment that the victim must choose between the politically correct response, or heeding internal warning bells going off. I am walking down the street and see a group of blacks. Do I cross the street to avoid them, risking the notion that they may be “offended” or do I do the politically correct thing, and approach them with a friendly demeanor? Do I mentally process the possibility that they have guns, knives, etc, and want to harm me? We are indoctrinated from pre-school on, to give blacks, hispanics, jews, etc, the benefit of the doubt and treat them as having the same mindset as ourselves. We are not allowed to think the dangerous thought that these folks may want to do me great bodily harm. This is forbidden to even think. This hesitation to ignore racial survival instincts has lead to thousands of needless murders of our White race. The British magazine, The New Scientist, is nothing more than a tabloid rag, which censors True Science in the interest of political correctness. I subscribed to it for a year and found it to be simply a summary of new developments in the world of science with no original writing, with the glaring exception of being politically correct, which, in the real world means, Death to the White Race.

I couldn’t agree more with Blightblingywingydoorag’s statement, “In each situation, the inner conflict between moral conditioning and reality led to hesitation or poor choices, resulting in the victim’s death.”
How very true! It is within that exact moment that the victim must choose between the politically correct response, or heeding [Nature’s] internal warning bells that are going off.

Thank you, Zoomcopter. I too was struck by the pithy truth of that sentence and wanted to make some further comment . You did it very well for me.
Yes, “conditioned mice” do need a moral argument to counter all the lifetime of indoctrination.

“Incidentally, here is a moral argument that Christians with an interest in science may appreciate:”

You mean, Christian Scientists?

Shabbos, no, I didn’t mean Christian Scientists as believers in that particular ‘church’. I mean ordinary Christians who happen to have a passing interest in scientific speculations of the sort advanced by Frank Tipler.

Celtic Warrior asks, “How are we going to start a course in survival101 for the lemmings??”

The first and most difficult step would be a critical self-examination of ourselves, followed by a course in Survival 101 for the chatters among us who believe that the endless and defensive rehashing of failed ideas and the assertion of untested ideas/opinion as truth constitutes positive action and activism.

“The ultimate equality is death” Now we are getting somewhere.
My saying- equality of results, only in the cemetery.

Because the female principle is egalitarianism. This is, I presume, psychological and not philosophical. The masculine principle is whatever is opposite of egalitarianism. This occurs during renaissance or growth periods.

Free men are not equal and as we know equal men are not free.

One question I have not been able to answer with clarity/fact it this, though the criminal and Treasonous/FDR set US up for Dec. 7, 1941 two years after he got England and France to declare War On Germany over Poland that was then given to Stalin seven years later which was not yet called WW 2.

So the question is this, since the majority of the Congress and polls that read stated that 90% of White males after Charles A. Lindberghs speech of Sept. 11 1941 were against the War so then why with the exception of ONE women representative from WY. did our main line offficers and Congress not go after FDR and his Cabal for Dec.7, and have arrested for this ?