The Biggest Hate Crime of All Time (that You Never Hear About)
Posted by Socrates in 'hate' crimes, egalitarianism, equalocracy, Jew World Order, jewed culture, jewed immigration policy, jewed law, jewhad, nation-building/nation-wrecking, Socrates, Western culture, World's Biggest Hate Crime at 4:09 pm | 
Permanent Link
What is the world’s biggest hate crime? The Bolshevik holocaust? No. Hitler’s “Holocaust”? Nope. Slavery? Mistreatment of the American Indians? No.
The world’s biggest hate crime began in earnest after World War II and is still occurring today: it is the deliberate ruination of the White countries via non-White immigration and egalitarianism. We’re talking about the planned extinction of a people – “genocide,” to use a Jewish word. Just think of it: entire cultures are being destroyed. Hundreds of millions of White people are endangered every day by more crime, more corruption, more disease, fewer jobs, more psychological stress, etc.
Who is responsible for the world’s biggest hate crime? The Jews, mostly, although liberals played a part, as did greedy conservatives who cared more about profits than about their own people.
Finally, isn’t it past time that we give this horrible crime a name? Any ideas, readers? (Ideally, the name should be short and catchy):
25 June, 2008 at 4:36 pm
“Tare-sowing” is the term I like to use.
25 June, 2008 at 5:09 pm
Eurocide
25 June, 2008 at 5:28 pm
In scientific terms it could be called a “Caucasoid Mass Extinction Event”.
25 June, 2008 at 6:18 pm
“white holocaust”
25 June, 2008 at 6:41 pm
The Jew World Order Holocaust.
25 June, 2008 at 8:50 pm
I just clicked the link to townhall.com and it goes nowhere. Did they take the article down? If so, do you have a copy you can post here?
25 June, 2008 at 10:06 pm
OldDude: the link works for me. Try it again:
http://www.townhall.com/Columnists/MattPurple/2008/06/25/british_novelist_who_despises_islamism_may_face_hate_crime_charges
26 June, 2008 at 6:30 am
Jewicide
26 June, 2008 at 7:37 am
“Ian McEwan condemned Muslim extremists for attempting to establish a tyrannical society intolerant of women and homosexuals.”
Will so-called Islamo-fascism turn out to be the savior of the West?
The Muslims seem to be the only ones who still have the courage to pick up a gun, or even a rock, and fight back against ZOG in all it’s manifestations. Why? Because they truly believe God is on their side… and that’s the only thing that inspires men to sacrifice all for the good of their culture and nation.
WNs would do well to figure that out… after two-thousand years has shown us enough examples of it.
26 June, 2008 at 8:50 am
Randolf, I admire many of the Muslim people who have the courage to fight against global imperialism for the defense of their homeland and people. However, they can’t and wont fight our battles for us. They’re more than happy to run over us in the process… because our own men and women are happy enough to be stooges in ZOG’s battles against them.
26 June, 2008 at 9:29 am
http://www.truthtellers.org/alerts/pedophiliasecret.html
PEDOPHILIA: THE TALMUD’S DIRTY SECRET
Court bans death penalty for child rape
By MARK SHERMAN, Associated Press WriterWed Jun 25, 7:40 PM ET
The Supreme Court declared Wednesday that executions are too severe a punishment for raping children, despite the “years of long anguish” for victims, in a ruling that restricts the death penalty to murder and crimes against the state.
The court’s 5-4 decision struck down a Louisiana law that allows capital punishment for people convicted of raping children under 12. It spares the only people in the U.S. under sentence of death for that crime — two Louisiana men convicted of raping girls 5 and 8.
The ruling also invalidates laws on the books in five other states that allowed executions for child rape that does not result in the death of the victim.
However devastating the crime to children, Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote in his majority opinion, “the death penalty is not a proportional punishment for the rape of a child.” His four liberal colleagues joined him, while the four more conservative justices dissented.
There has not been an execution in the United States for a crime that did not also involve the death of the victim in 44 years, a factor that weighed in Kennedy’s decision.
Rape and other crimes “may be as devastating in their harm, as here, but ‘in terms of moral depravity and of the injury to the person and to the public,’ they cannot be compared to murder in their ‘severity and irrevocability,'” Kennedy said, quoting from earlier decisions.
The victim in the case decided Wednesday was an 8-year-old girl raped by her stepfather at their home in Harvey, La., outside New Orleans.
Angry Louisianans who backed the law said the court was out of touch.
“The opinion reads more like an out-of-control legislative debate than a constitutional analysis,” said Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal, a Republican. “One thing is clear: The five members of the court who issued the opinion do not share the same ‘standards of decency’ as the people of Louisiana.”
The decision resonated in the presidential campaign, too, where Democrat Barack Obama objected to it. Obama said there should be no blanket prohibition of the death penalty for the rape of children if states want to apply it in those cases.
With the court already on record this term reaffirming the constitutionality of capital punishment in a case dealing with lethal injection, Kennedy dwelt at length on the need to limit the death penalty to the most heinous killings.
The decision allows death sentences to continue to be imposed for crimes such as treason, espionage and terrorism, which Kennedy labeled as crimes against the state.
The Supreme Court banned executions for rape in 1977 in a case in which the victim was an adult woman.
Forty-four states prohibit the death penalty for any kind of rape, and five states besides Louisiana have allowed it for child rapists — Georgia, Montana, Oklahoma, South Carolina and Texas.
The court struggled over how to apply standards laid out in decisions barring executions for the mentally retarded and people younger than 18 when they committed murder. In those cases, the court cited trends in the states away from capital punishment…
26 June, 2008 at 2:42 pm
[quote]However, they can’t and wont fight our battles for us. They’re more than happy to run over us in the process… because our own men and women are happy enough to be stooges in ZOG’s battles against them.[/quote]
Agreed, of course… I was merely throwing a wake-up call to the WNs that only a people who believe in God have the courage to do what it takes to save and expand their culture… so all of this talk about race alone just isn’t going to save the day… faith trumps race.
26 June, 2008 at 5:09 pm
“Semiticly Orchesrated Caucaside” The deliberate destruction of the White Race by jews.
26 June, 2008 at 8:41 pm
THE RUSSIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH UNDER JEWISH COMMUNISM, 1917 – 1991 (EXCERPT FROM JEWISH WIKIPEDIA)…
Russian Orthodox Church under Communist rule
The Orthodox Church clergy in Russia was seen as sympathetic with the cause of the White Army in the Civil War (see White movement) after the October Revolution, and occasionally collaborated with it; Patriarch Tikhon’s declared position was harshly anti-Bolshevik in 1918. This may have further strengthened the Bolshevik animus against the church.
Before and after the October Revolution of November 7, 1917 (October 25 Old Calendar) there was a movement within the Soviet Union to unite all of the people of the world under Communist rule (see Communist International). This included the Eastern European bloc countries as well as the Balkan States. Since some of these Slavic states tied their ethnic heritage to their ethnic churches, both the peoples and their church were targeted by the Soviet.[35] [36]
The Soviets’ official interpretation of freedom of conscience was one of “guaranteeing the right to profess any religion, or profess none, to practice religious cults, or conduct atheist propaganda”,[37] though in effect atheism was sponsored by state and was taught in all educational establishments.[38] Public criticism of atheism was unofficially forbidden and sometimes led to imprisonment.[39]
The Soviet Union was the first state to have as an ideological objective the elimination of religion. Toward that end, the Communist regime confiscated church property, ridiculed religion, harassed believers, and propagated atheism in the schools. Actions toward particular religions, however, were determined by State interests, and most organized religions were never outlawed. Some actions against Orthodox priests and believers along with execution included torture being sent to prison camps, labour camps or mental hospitals.[40][41]
The result of this militant atheism was to transform the Church into a persecuted and martyred Church. In the first five years after the Bolshevik revolution, 28 bishops and 1,200 priests were executed.[42]
The main target of the anti-religious campaign in the 1920s and 1930s was the Russian Orthodox Church, which had the largest number of faithful. Nearly all of its clergy, and many of its believers, were shot or sent to labor camps. Theological schools were closed, and church publications were prohibited. In the period between 1917 and 1940, the number of Orthodox Churches in the Russian Republic fell from 59,584 to less than 500. Between 1917 and 1935, 130,000 Orthodox priests were arrested. Of these, 95,000 were put to death, executed by firing squad.[citation needed]
After Nazi Germany’s attack on the Soviet Union in 1941, Joseph Stalin revived the Russian Orthodox Church to intensify patriotic support for the war effort. By 1957 about 22,000 Russian Orthodox churches had become active. But in 1959 Nikita Khrushchev initiated his own campaign against the Russian Orthodox Church and forced the closure of about 12,000 churches. By 1985 fewer than 7,000 churches remained active. It is estimated that 50,000 clergy were executed by the end of the Khrushchev era.[42] Members of the church hierarchy were jailed or forced out, their places taken by docile clergy, many of whom had ties with the KGB.
In the Soviet Union, in addition to the methodical closing and destruction of churches, the charitable and social work formerly done by ecclesiastical authorities was taken over by the state. As with all private property, Church owned property was confiscated into public use. The few places of worship left to the Church were legally viewed as state property which the government permitted the church to use. After the advent of state funded universal education, the Church was not permitted to carry on educational, instructional activity of any kind. Outside of sermons during the celebration of the divine liturgy it could not instruct or evangelise to the faithful or its youth. Catechism classes, religious schools, study groups, Sunday schools and religious publications were all illegal and or banned. This persecution continued, even after the death of Stalin until the Fall of Communism in 1991. This caused many religious tracts to be circulated as illegal literature or samizdat.[40]
Among the most damaging aspects of Soviet rule, along with these physical abuses, the Soviet Union frequently manipulated the recruitment and appointment of priests, sometimes planting agents of the KGB within the church to monitor religious persons who were viewed — simply for not being atheists — as suspicious and potential threats to Soviet communism. The recovery of religious beliefs in Russia after the fall of communism, part of a significant religious revival, has been made more challenging as a result of those leaders forced involuntarily upon the church by the KGB during Soviet times.
26 June, 2008 at 10:10 pm
What would happen if there was “A Day without Whites?”
27 June, 2008 at 4:06 am
Invasion by immigration will stop when jews and globalists start to FEAR us. You guys know what I mean.
The jewycons will not tolerate any threat to yidsrael security, so an attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities must be a certainty. It is possible that McCain / Banana will order a strike as early as 2010.
If things go badly wrong ZOG may proclaim martial law and rationing of essentials. This will be good news for us, be READY.
27 June, 2008 at 11:15 am
I was gonna suggest ‘Eurocide’, but I think ‘Jewicide’ is better.
28 June, 2008 at 3:27 pm
What would happen if there was “A Day without Whites?”
Nothing. . .
1 July, 2008 at 10:20 am
The Iranians might beat us to the punch yet to get rid of Israel…
3 July, 2008 at 6:15 pm
Randolf Facto:
Faith trumps race? Belief in God?
WN and Christian = mutually exclusive.
I will never practice an alien monotheistic religion that comes originally from Judaea. Reason trumps faith; this tradition dates back to the Ancient Greeks. Leave semitic “holy ghosts” out of it. Christianity was the first act of imperialism against whites.
Stop the Jewicide!