I find it telling that Dr. MacDonald has, as the symbol of Western Civ, a Christian (and moreover, an ENGLISH Liturgical) CHURCH as his front cover.
Yet it is the disparaging of that Anglican ethos by all sides, that denies it has any place in the discussion, that is absent from the Dr.’s work.
As I have said time and again, you cannot fight Zionazis and Talmudism (Both aberrant religious ideologies) with anything but a competing religion.
Islam is NOT that religion. Only Patristic, Historic, NON-dispensationalist, NON-‘seeker-sensitive,’ NON-Arminian ‘holiness’ Christianity will suffice.
9 April, 2008 at 11:47 pm
Looks like most of the articles listed have already been published in the OQ and on VDare, or have I mistaken?
10 April, 2008 at 12:09 am
Billy Bonnie Says: “Looks like most of the articles listed have already been published in the OQ and on VDare, or have I mistaken?”
Yes, most have been published previously.
11 April, 2008 at 10:30 pm
I find it telling that Dr. MacDonald has, as the symbol of Western Civ, a Christian (and moreover, an ENGLISH Liturgical) CHURCH as his front cover.
Yet it is the disparaging of that Anglican ethos by all sides, that denies it has any place in the discussion, that is absent from the Dr.’s work.
As I have said time and again, you cannot fight Zionazis and Talmudism (Both aberrant religious ideologies) with anything but a competing religion.
Islam is NOT that religion. Only Patristic, Historic, NON-dispensationalist, NON-‘seeker-sensitive,’ NON-Arminian ‘holiness’ Christianity will suffice.
12 April, 2008 at 9:35 pm
Is the redeeemer a jew?