Vanguard News Network

SAHLOET.

If present demographic trends continue, 25 years from now the United States and Canada will ‘enjoy’ the wonderful ‘benefits’ of Black-Mud majority rule. Europe will not be far behind.

Let’s not fool ourselves, that jew inspired scenario will come to pass unless we as individual White Nationalist get the truth about race and history across to the sheeple.

Let’s not be deceived by Smith’s lauded role as political leader of Rhodesia.
If he had looked hard at the strategic situation, which as an officer he ought to have been trained to do, weighed the odds for the future, he would have realized that Rhodesia as it was could not be held under white rule for any length of time.
A statesman, what he wasn’t, could not harbor any illusions, that the tiny minority of widely dispersed white settlers pitted against a six million mass of black rabble- multiplying faster than ever (thanks to Rhodesia’s white farmers’ food supply)-and looking for bosses to lead them into the promised land, eventually invited a racial catastrophe. Smith’s achievements were typical politician’s makeshift, like UDI, begging for help from South Africa, negotiating with ZOG agents etc.
One does not need to favour the much touted racial mayority to conclude, that, if Premier Smith did not have the strength to expell the niggers, he should have lead his race out of the country altogether, which would, of course, saved much white blood and caused the total collapse of “Zimbabwe’s” economy immediately. Whether South Africa was a refuge is questionable, history has proved that. But even that could have been different, if the South Africans had been a bit wiser, especially abandoned their favored use of cheap black labour. It’s always the capitalist ZOG system that sooner or later causes the downfall.
It may seem hard, but nobody here will deny, that Israel shows the way: there has to be only one race, one nation in a country, and rightly it gives a damn to anybody claiming otherwise. If that is good for jews, it was good for Rhodesia- and us too.

Rhodesia was not only literally threatend with Lancaster bombers to flown from Kenya, by White English men, but at the time S.A. cut off Alll helicopter parts and you name it. supplies.

The Chicom/N.Koreans had trained the Mudgoobe crowd of savages, but the force behind the over throwing of Rhodesia was Ju York and Lundune kikes and their media.

http://www.originaldissent.com/forums/printthread.php?t=3996&pp=10&page=2

This is the thread for the above posting

IAEA: Iran generally truthful about nuclear history

Britain, U.S. still push for new sanctions, saying Tehran must ‘come clean on all issues’
Last Updated: Thursday, November 15, 2007 | 2:37 PM ET
The Associated Press
A report from the UN nuclear watchdog agency on Thursday found Iran to be generally truthful about key aspects of its nuclear history, but it warned that its knowledge of Tehran’s present atomic work was shrinking.
However, the White House said it would continue to push for a third round of UN sanctions against Iran, despite the findings by the International Atomic Energy Agency.
The agency report, released to its 35 board members, also confirmed that Tehran continued to defy the UN Security Council by ignoring its repeated demands to freeze uranium enrichment, a potential pathway to nuclear arms.
White House press secretary Dana Perino said the report indicated that Iran has not suspended its enrichment-related activities and continues to defy the international community.
“We believe that selective co-operation is not good enough,” she said. “Iran continues to walk away from a deal that has been offered to them. We said they can have a civil nuclear program if they’ll just suspend their current activities.”
But the IAEA report shows that new sanctions against Tehran would be “illegal action,” top Iranian negotiator Saeed Jalili said.
He said Iran has answered all the questions by the IAEA and made “good progress” in co-operating with it.
In light of the IAEA report, “many accusations are now baseless,” Jalili said, referring to U.S. claims Tehran is pursuing nuclear weapons. “Those powers who base their accusations on this I hope will reconsider what they say.”
If new UN sanctions are approved, “you should be asking what is the logic in this,” Jalili told reporters in Tehran.
But Britain’s Foreign Office said shortly after the report was issued that it would pursue further sanctions from the Security Council and the European Union.
“If Iran wants to restore trust in its program, it must come clean on all outstanding issues without delay,” the statement said. It also said Tehran must restore broader and stronger inspection rights to IAEA teams and mothball its enrichment activities to avoid further penalties.
Much of the 10-page report, made available to the Associated Press, focused on the history of Iran’s black-market procurements and its past development of enrichment technology — and the agency appeared to be giving Tehran a pass on that issue, repeatedly saying it concludes that “Iran’s statements are consistent with … information available to the agency.”
A senior UN official said that language did not mean the IAEA’s investigation into past enrichment activities was “closed,” even though a work plan between the agency and Tehran set November as the deadline for clearing up the issue.
Last week, Iran said it stepped up uranium enrichment activities by fully running 3,000 centrifuges at its nuclear plant in the central city of Natanz. It would take some 54,000 centrifuges to fuel a reactor.
Two rounds of UN sanctions have failed to persuade Iran to halt the uranium enrichment, a technology that can be used to produce nuclear fuel to generate electricity or fissile material for a warhead.