Vanguard News Network

[i]Not only was my blog given a content warning but it was “de-listed” by blogger/google. Being de-listed means your website doesn’t show up on any search engines. [/i]

Yahoo still has it. Boycott Google and all their products. If you’re using Firefox Adblock googlesyndication*. If you’re using Explorer learn to edit the hosts file and block google there. Your clicks feed the Jew.

Google, based in a country that’s 85% Christian, has never had a Christmas logo but they have logos for every PC psuedo-holiday.

Smell the Jew, friends.

E. Michael Jones wrote:
“…As I was getting ready to give my speech at the National Press Club, I looked at all the photos on the wall. It was full of pictures of celebrities I had known from my youth—people like Art Buchwald, Eric Severeid, Marvin Kalb—but somehow they all looked older and uglier than I remembered them. These photos were not a thing of beauty and a joy forever, or even for the few short minutes I had to view them. So they must have served some other purpose. What the picture did was to testify to the bona fides of the people it portrayed. Both people were validated by the photo of one man giving an award and the other man receiving it—at least in primitive cultures like Washington.”

in reply:
Are the Senses of E. Michael Jones telling him what his Mind is trying to ignore?

This sentence fragment, “…but somehow they all looked older and uglier than I remembered them,” is rather telling, when you realize he is describing the demonic Jews, who do not age well, at all. Perhaps this is because, eventually, their true Nature slips out…

E. Michael Jones wrote:
And that was almost as funny as the reaction I got to my talk. For those of you who are tuning in late, the talk I gave was in honor of Sam Francis and was essentially the review of two books connected with the late Sam Francis, which appeared in the March issue of Culture Wars. My ruminations on the role race played in Sam’s writings set off an explosion which still has debris falling around me. Most of the howling came from Peter Brimelow, editor of the vdare website and author, 12-years ago, of Alien Nation: Common Sense about America’s Immigration Disaster. On the Monday following the talk, the following passage appeared on Peter Brimelow’s blog, describing the conference.

E. Michael Jones quoted Peter Brimelow, who wrote:
CSPAN was there, but VDARE.COM readers probably won’t get to watch the conference because of an extraordinary performance by E. Michael Jones, editor of Culture Wars and a prize specimen even by the standards of my lifelong study of characters on the American Right. Jones denounced Elizabethan England, Puritans, capitalism, Protestants, “revolutionary Jews” (but not all Jews, he was quite nuanced) and, for good measure, the idea that race matters or that America was ever a nation. I like Catholic bigots as much as anyone else, but this had nothing to do with anything Sam Francis ever wrote – except where it actually contradicted his views. Sam felt bitterly that he never had the recognition he deserved while he was alive. Jones ensured that he won’t get it now that he’s dead.

E. Michael Jones wrote:
Mr. Brimelow had apparently calmed down by Monday because missing from his blog entry was the hysteria which characterized his e-mails in the immediate aftermath of the conference. It is a rare and disedifying sight to see a grown man so consumed by fear, but here was Peter Brimelow absolutely petrified. And what was he afraid of? That someone might have photographed him standing next to E. Michael Jones! In the immediate aftermath of the conference, Mr. Brimelow professed to be appalled by my talk, which is his right. The really funny part came later in the same communication when he announced that “I can’t be associated with anything in which that speech is featured [or] . . . to be in any photographs or material of any kind in which Jones is present.” (I had to edit his original text because fear evidently rendered his syntax incoherent.)

Now that is serious fear. Unfortunately, it was a bit too late to do anything about it. On page 2 of a brochure handed out by the Fitzgerald Griffin Foundation on the day of the conference, there we are—Peter Brimelow and I—cheek by jowl, pictures and all, right next to each other. It’s not quite the usual press club deal with the two of us arm in arm the one receiving a plaque from the other, but you got the impression that Peter Brimelow felt this was career-ending material, and there wasn’t a damn thing that Peter Brimelow could do about it. Hence, the terror.

That impression was strengthened when Peter Brimelow’s lawyer contacted conference organizer Fran Griffin on the Tuesday following the talk. In one of those chilling missives that only lawyers know how to write, Fran Griffin, who is a woman by the way, (Why do people like Peter Brimelow beat up on women for things they did not say?) was informed that she must respect Peter Brimelow’s “right of publicity and exclude his speech and any reference to his conference participation from any publication that includes Dr. Jones’s speech.” (As some indication of the sort of association which Mr. Brimelow does not fear, his v-dare site has links to the Zionist fanatic Daniel Pipes.)

in reply:
Yet ANOTHER conditioned “right” has been created, a “right of publicity,” apparently to match the “right of privacy” found in the penumbra of the Constitution!

Some of us have more “rights” than others, it seems, and, if we don’t, someone will create them for us.

*snip*

E. Michael Jones wrote:
I never knew that photos could be so important, or that they could cause such panic. Once Brimelow and Peter Gemma started circulating their e-mails, however, the panic among the fair weather culture warriors spread like wildfire. Linda Muller, a conference attendee and Buchanan supporter, fired off an e-mail of her which could serve as a primer on how not to react to pressure: “Fran needs to end CYA [i.e., cover your ass] and do a long-winded PRIVATE mea culpa,” which involved the following steps: “1) Admit the mistake; 2) Apologize profusely; 3) Denounce E. Michael Jones; 4) Define a thorough separation from Jones — Sam Francis and those who attended the event.” Mrs. Muller, who describes herself as a “traditional Catholic,” would have loved Stalin’s show trials. She is also probably a fan of cropping photos to delete disgraced members of the Politburo. I say this because her first reaction to my speech indicated sympathy for that behavior. Once the panic gripped her, Muller sabotaged the Sam Francis website, “I just deleted every reference to the conference off the shotsfired.us website. If anyone has an issue with that, they can try to justify it with me directly.” (Oddly enough, Fran Griffin, the owner of the site, did have an issue with that.) By the end of her e-mail, Muller was recommending that everyone pretend that I had never set foot in Washington. “Right now I suggest the best thing for all of us to do is to act like the conference never happened.”

in reply:
One, THIS is a fascinating study in how quickly you can become an Unperson, if you dare even associate with those who are on the Unperson list of the demonic Jews. Note the emphasis on PRIVATE mea culpa(e). WHO gets to make THAT phone call?

Two, might it be that Jones “never knew that photos could be so important,” simply because he did not see the world through the eyes of the demonic Jews, who are trying to control the pictures you see, and the words you hear, and read.

E. Michael Jones wrote:
*snip*
But what I can’t understand is how someone like Peter Brimelow could be held accountable for a talk that I gave.
*end snip*

in reply:
The agenda the Jews would allow was to praise the OLD “Conservative” Sam Francis, and ruthlessly attack the NEW Sam Francis, who realized, however belatedly, at the end of his life, the absolute primacy of RACIAL thinking for the WHITE RACE. Remember, it was undoubtedly losing his job with the Washington TIMES, his middle-class respectability, and virtually all of his respectable financial support, that FORCED him to see just what line he had crossed, who pulled the strings that cost him his job, and why.

It then hit Francis: “If RACIAL IDENTITY works so well for the Jews, why won’t it work for the WHITE RACE?”

THAT is the theme that grew to dominate his later work; as he realized, and spoke, more of the Truth, the more he became an Unperson.

THAT is the Truth that E. Michael Jones runs in fear from, defining the issue as Dogma, rather than seeing the issue correctly as DNA. Hell, he so much as admitted the Jews have a veto over who gets to be nominated for sainthood in the Roman Catholic Church…

E. Michael Jones wrote:
So why all this nervousness about pictures and making sure that the Washington Times spiked the story they were going to run and making sure that C-Span never ran its footage of the conference? Why, in other words, was this conference sabotaged by the very people who should have wanted to promote it? The answer is fear. Washington is a primitive culture which runs on the sympathetic magic known as guilt by association. The denizens of this primitive culture run in fear of guilt by association because it is inflicted on them on an ongoing basis….

in reply:
DAMN, but Jones comes closer and closer to the Truth; “…fear of guilt by association” WITH whom, and BY whom?

What group has the power to “inflict” this guilt “on an ongoing basis?”

What group can make this conference disappear from the Washington TIMES, and even C-SPAN?

J-E-W-S.

What group would even want to make this conference disappear from the public view?

J-E-W-S.

E. Michael Jones wrote:
But that wasn’t the profound part of what Taki had to say. That came later, when he wrote. “The trouble is in a free society speakers are not vetted before they speak. None of us, Fran Griffin included, were responsible for Michael Jones’s opinions—some (not all) of which were right on, incidentally.”….Taki, in this regard, is either more courageous or less perceptive than Linda Muller and Peter Brimelow, who are smart enough to know that the system of intimidation can only work if everyone else in the room could be held responsible and punished for the views that I expressed. If everyone believed what Taki believed, the system of guilt by association would collapse overnight. Since the system is in full force, it should be obvious that no one believes that people can only be held accountable for what they themselves say. If that were the case, why would Peter Brimelow and Linda Muller have exhibited such a panic attack for things they had not said?

in reply:
Self-censorship is the most effective form of censorship; the greatest slave is the one who believes he is free.

E. Michael Jones wrote:
*snip*

In case you haven’t noticed, the SPLC has declared war on Catholics.

*end snip*

in reply:
And the cowardly Catholics do not do one Goddamn thing about it, except dance the approval dance for their RACIAL Enemies.

Not only has the SPLC “declared war on Catholics,” they have won in all but name…

Not a “Shot Fired…”

E. Michael Jones wrote:
*snip*
*end snip*
The offensive launched by the Southern Poverty Law Center is the best indication I can offer that the main front in the culture wars is now the confrontation between Jews and Catholics. The Enlightenment is finally dead. There are no more quasi-Masonic movements, where each of us can rise above whatever sect he belongs to and join the Lodge known as “conservatism” or liberalism, or whatever. I think we, no matter what our religious or ethnic background, should rejoice at this development because in this confrontation 1) the Church has both a history and a set of beliefs that will lay to rest forever the charge of anti-Semitism and destroy it as a tool of political oppression and 2) because no matter how much they want to finesse the attack by focusing on what they consider fringe groups, the Jews have taken on a considerable group of people, who will react eventually to the attack. The situation in Hungary now is a case in point.

in reply:
The claim, “…the Jews have taken on a considerable group of people, who will react eventually to the attack,” is simply wishful thinking.

After all, the Pope is appointing members of the ADL to the Papal Order of St.Gregory.

E. Michael Jones wrote:
And finally, we should be happy because the attack clearly defines the terms of engagement, all of which are all spiritual. The revolutionary Jew is our enemy because he is a rejecter of Logos, not because of his DNA. We are not anti-Semites because we oppose the machinations of the revolutionary Jew. No, we are true Christians because of that, as the Church from the time of St. Peter onward has proclaimed. Like St. Peter and St. Paul, we are suffering at the hands of the Jews, “the people who put the Lord Jesus to death, and the prophets too. And now they have been persecuting us, and acting in a way that cannot please God and makes them the enemies of the whole human race.” (I Thess 1:15).

in reply:
JUDAISM IS THE EXACT OPPOSITE OF CHRISTIANITY.

Good to see Jones is quoting someone who ADMITS the demonic Jews are “the enemies of the whole human race.”

THAT, of course, officially makes the Jews Inhuman – demonic, if you will – which has been our position for some time.

Light going on yet, Dr. Jones?

E. Michael Jones wrote:
We are now engaged in a battle which has ebbed and flowed over the centuries, but the sides in this battle have not changed. What has changed are the odds. The Jews have never been stronger; the Catholics have never been weaker, but the outcome of spiritual battles—and the battle for the soul of the West, as Tolkien knew, is a spiritual battle—no matter what the odds, is rarely predictable….

in reply:
DAMN, Dr. Jones, when do WE get our turn at bat, and what would that look like?

When do you sell that cloak, and buy a sword?

E. Michael Jones wrote:
And so, as Theoden said, “we come to it in the end, the great battle of our time, in which many things will pass away. But at least there is no longer need for hiding.” Nor, might we add, any place to hide. Many if not most of us are here today because our careers have already been destroyed by the revolutionary Jew and his goyische front men. The Jews spy on us through our computers. They suborn fellow Catholics to betray us, get us fired, prevent us from speaking. Our backs are to the wall. But in attacking John Sharpe, the SPLC has created the American Catholic version of the Dreyfus affair. They have clarified the issue. By going along with their slanders, the Navy has put itself on trial. It is our duty to play the cards which providence has dealt us….

in reply:
Dr. Jones, has it ever occurred to you that having “clarified the issue,” you see that VNN has correctly “clarified the issue” FIRST?

And, we can state is in ONE phrase:

NO JEWS. JUST RIGHT.

E. Michael Jones wrote:
Perhaps the mention of John Sharpe made Peter Brimelow nervous because if there were ever a man who was the victim of character assassination via guilt by association, it was John Sharpe….

in reply:
As compared to the morbidly obese, unfashionably unattractive, socially scorned, Dr. Sam Francis, who fought so hard for the “paste-jewel of middle-class respectability,” and the approval of those who had nothing whatsoever to gain from granting him their approval?

E. Michael Jones wrote:
*snip*
*end snip*

But let’s engage in a thought experiment that will make guilt by association even easier for the cub reporters at the SPLC. Suppose for a moment that I had addressed a Neo-Nazi rally in Germany. Is there any doubt in anybody’s mind what I would have told them? I would have given exactly the same speech that I gave at the Sam Francis memorial in Washington. I would have told them that our enemy is the revolutionary Jew, and that racism is stupid because it prevents us from addressing the real problem, which is the Jewish rejection of Logos and not any malignant (or mystical) DNA…

…Once our culture turned away from Christ and began to embrace the Talmud, fear of ritual impurity would become one of the main instruments of political control, a fact nowhere more evident than in Washington.

in reply:
Dr. Jones begins to accept the Truth – our Culture has “turned away from Christ,” and “embrace(d) the Talmud…”

The Truth, of course, is somewhat more complex; the Jews who CONTROL the Mass Communications Systems of our Culture have TRANSFORMED the Culture into their perversion; they have not just “turned away from Christ,” they have mocked Him, scorned Him, beat Him and destroyed Him, and their plans for His Followers are no better, as is clearly articulated in their Holy Book, the Talmud.

E. Michael Jones wrote:
….In an obit on Sam Francis which appeared in the American Conservative, we were told that Jared Taylor wanted to do for white nationalism what William F. Buckley did for conservatism. And what is that? Well, to subvert it in the interests of the Jews. One of the entries at the SPLC site claims that “It is well-known that the American Renaissance does not allow anti-Semitism; it is uptown, 100% clean WN [white nationalism]. Call it a first step if you like, but it is a very important first step, and Jared Taylor has had success.”

in reply:
One day, Dr. Jones will recognize that Jews will go to any length to avoid defining “anti-Semitism,” which, in practice, simply means “Not Under The Control Of The JEWS.”

Simple as that.

If the demonic bearers of the Spirit of Anti-Christ do not totally control something, it might well, one day, act against their dark, demonic dreams for the rest of us, and for all of Mankind.

In the example of American Renaissance, the SPLC says, approving, “It is well-known that the American Renaissance does not allow anti-Semitism…”

No.

They ONLY allow PRO-JEWISH comments.

If you think it is somewhat odd that American Renaissance, a website that purports to discuss RACIAL Dynamics, will NEVER allow the most remote discussion of the reasons why the Goddamn JEWS are the most successful RACE on the planet today, perhaps it is simply that they not only don’t “allow anti-Semitism,” they also don’t want the suckers to get an even break, our of well-founded fear as to what might happen if they did.

I have often argued that the False Flag White Nationalists simply define the demonic Jews as our RACIAL Enemies, and change the subject. They never ask what we can learn from the demonic Jews, the servants “of their father, the Devil,” which is quite a lot, indeed.

What we choose to do with that knowledge is a topic for another time.

Here’s your take-home message, Dr. Jones:

Sam Francis was exiled from the respectable Conservative community for committing the sin of “anti-Semitism,” which the Jews refuse to define.

Why should we even accept, much less argue with, terms that lack definition?

New America

An Idea Whose Time Is HERE!

“Not only was my blog given a content warning but it was “de-listed” by blogger/google. Being de-listed means your website doesn’t show up on any search engines. ”

Yahoo still has it. Boycott Google and all their products. If you’re using Firefox Adblock googlesyndication.com. If you’re using Explorer learn to edit the hosts file and block google there. Your clicks feed the Jew.

Google, based in a country that’s 85% Christian, has never had a Christmas logo but they have logos for every PC psuedo-holiday.

Smell the Jew, friends.

What’s “wrong” with Sarah Silverman?

from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarah_Silverman

Silverman is very open about her lifelong battle with clinical depression, crediting her freedom from attacks of emotional despair to her use of prescription Zoloft. Silverman has said that she is a teetotaller because alcohol nauseates her. She has, however, claimed that she smokes marijuana at least four days out of each week.

More generally, whenever you hear a ‘celebrity’ speak, you are listening to someone who is highly addicted, often to alcohol and/or street drugs (and boy those “stars” love to smoke–nicotine is the number one hard-to-quit Hymiewood addiction), but also likely to “prescribed” drugs of various sorts–some as bad as the illegal kind. All of which can considerably affect mood and self-image. Kurt Vonnegut wrote:

here: http://www.inthesetimes.com/article/cold_turkey/

“that only nut cases want to be president.” Well, the same is pretty much true of anyone who deliberately seeks fame as an end in itself. Consider also the fucked-up jewish culture that surrounds these “stars,” and you begin to see, after a while of really looking, that they all behave like sociopathic attention-seeking children. Whether they are actually “at work” or pleading for the lastest judeoliberal “cause” or just out and about in public.