Vanguard News Network

 

Excerpt: In a kindergarten in Stockholm, the parents were encouraged
by the preschool teachers – apparently ideological pioneers – to equip
their sons with dresses and female first names. There are now weeks in
some places when boys HAVE TO wear a dress. Lundgren considers this
sexual indoctrination as worse than the political: “The political
nonsense is seeking to alter opinions – the sex freaks seek to alter
the children’s personality, their mentality and their entire
constitution.”

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sweden: Sharia-Supporters and Transvestites of the World Unite!

 

Fjordman – 7/3/2007

 

I was planning to take a break from writing about Sweden, but I just
couldn’t help it. Swedish journalist Kurt Lundgren had a noteworthy
story on his blog this week. A friend told him about a magazine
published by Lärarförbundet, the Swedish Teachers’ Union, the largest
union for teachers and heads of schools in the country. The magazine,
aimed at preschool teachers who take care of children between the ages
of 0-6 years old, included recommendations to not only promote “gender
equality” but also “sexual equality” at this tender age. Mr. Lundgren
considers the suggestions that are sent out to kindergarten and
preschool staff to be clear-cut sexual abuse of children:

 

“A three-year-old doesn’t have to learn queer theory, a four-year-old
shouldn’t have to be force-fed lectures on gay sex by some sex freak
from the Teachers’ Union. Children are supposed to play and discover
their roles entirely on their own. Children are defenseless and
shouldn’t be exposed to indoctrination, neither regarding sex nor
politics.. (.) One wonders whether parents are aware of the abuses
against preschool children that that Teachers’ Union’s magazine
Pedagogiska magasinet is encouraging.”

 

In a kindergarten in Stockholm, the parents were encouraged by the
preschool teachers – apparently ideological pioneers – to equip their
sons with dresses and female first names. There are now weeks in some
places when boys HAVE TO wear a dress. Lundgren considers this sexual
indoctrination as worse than the political: “The political nonsense is
seeking to alter opinions – the sex freaks seek to alter the
children’s personality, their mentality and their entire
constitution.”

 

After posting this, Lundgren soon received a threatening email: “I
have been in touch with the Teachers’ Union. They are considering
reporting you to the police for what you wrote about queer and gay sex
as abuse of children.”

 

Lundgren wrote in reply: “To give sex education to preschool children,
to force them to have an opinion on gay sex and queer (lesbians,
transsexuals, bisexuality, fetishism, cross over, sex change etc.) I
regard as abuse of children. (.) Little children, we are talking about
three to six-year-olds here, cannot in the preschool protect
themselves from these sexual assaults. Their parents are not there,
the children are totally left to themselves. (.) Little children need
to be left alone, they are supposed to play without adult
supervision.”

 

Some comments left by his blog readers:

 

“There won’t be a police report about this. The Socialist Teachers’
Union will probably think twice before doing so. There could be a
backlash if the media start writing about queer [theory] directed
against children and the parents will open their eyes to what’s going
on with their loved ones.”

 

“My 11-months-old son will never be allowed to go to a kindergarten. I
and my cohabitant reserve the right to raise our son into a thinking,
rational and independent individual. He will definitely be allowed to
wear a Superman costume, play with cars and build wooden houses if he
wants to. I will never force him to wear a princess costume against
his will. Presumably it won’t be long before parents like us will have
our children taken away from us, to be raised in accordance with
sound, Socialist doctrines.”

 

“My 13-year-old son had `equality day’ [in school] and had to listen
to a transvestite. I have myself never encountered or talked to one
during my considerably longer life. Why is this important? Today’s
children know nothing about the crimes of Communism, but everything
about the sexual orientation of transvestites.”

 

This last comment is quite literally true. A poll carried out on
behalf of the Organization for Information on Communism found that 90
percent of Swedes between the ages of 15 and 20 had never heard of the
Gulag, although 95 percent knew of Auschwitz. “Unfortunately we were
not at all surprised by the findings,” Ander Hjemdahl, the founder of
UOK, told website The Local. In the nationwide poll, 43 percent
believed that Communist regimes had claimed less than one million
lives. The actual figure is estimated at 100 million. 40 percent
believed that Communism had contributed to increased prosperity in the
world. Mr. Hjemdahl states several reasons for this massive ignorance,
among them that “a large majority of Swedish journalists are
left-wingers, many of them quite far left.”

 

Meanwhile, Antifascistisk Aktion in Sweden, a group that supposedly
fights against “racists,” openly brag about numerous physical attacks
against persons with their full name and address published on their
website. According to AFA, this is done in order to fight against
global capitalism and for a classless society. They subscribe to an
ideology that killed one hundred million people during a few
generations, and they are the good guys. Those who object to being
turned into a minority in their own country through mass immigration
are the bad guys.

 

British historian Roland Huntford wrote a book in the early 1970s
about Sweden called The New Totalitarians. Huntford notes how equality
between the sexes was aggressively promoted from the late 1960s and
early 1970s:

 

“When sexual equality was promulgated, and it was decided that a
woman’s place was not at home but out at work, there was a rapid
change in the language. The customary Swedish for housewife is husmor,
which is honourable; it was replaced by the neologism hemmafru,
literally `the-wife-who-stays-at-home’, which is derogatory. Within a
few months, the mass media were able to kill the old and substitute
the new term. By the end of 1969, it was almost impossible in everyday
conversation to mention the state of housewife without appearing to
condemn or to sneer. Swedish had been changed under the eyes and ears
of the Swedes. Husmor had been discredited; the only way out was to
use hemmafru ironically. Connected with this semantic shift, there was
a change in feeling. Women who, a year or so before, had been
satisfied, and possibly proud, to stay at home, began to feel the
pressure to go out to work. The substitution of one word for the other
had been accompanied by insistent propaganda in the mass media, so
that it was as if a resolute conditioning campaign had been carried
out. Very few were able to recognize the indoctrination in the
linguistic manipulation; in the real sense of the word, the population
had been brain-washed.”

 

This was closely linked to a campaign for sexual liberation:

 

“Indeed, the word `freedom’ in Swedish has come to mean almost
exclusively sexual freedom, product perhaps of an unadmitted
realization that it is absent, or unwanted, elsewhere. Through sex
instruction at school for the young, and incessant propaganda in the
mass media for the older generations, most of Sweden has been taught
to believe that freedom has been achieved through sex. Because he is
sexually emancipated, the Swede believes that he is a free man, and
judges liberty entirely in sexual terms. (.) The Swedish government
has taken what it is pleased to call `the sexual revolution’ under its
wing. Children are impressed at school that sexual emancipation is
their birthright, and this is done in such a way as to suggest that
the State is offering them their liberty from old-fashioned
restrictions.”

 

By old-fashioned restrictions, read Christianity and Christian
morality. Huntford notes that this came together with efforts to
downplay or attack Western culture prior to the French Revolution.
According to Mr. Olof Palme, who was Swedish Socialist Prime Minister
until 1986: “The Renaissance So-called? Western culture? What does it
mean to us?”

 

“The State,” in the words of Ingvar Carlsson, then Minister of
Education, “is concerned with morality from a desire to change
society.” Mr. Carlsson, who was Swedish Prime Minister as late as
1996, has also stated that “School is the spearhead of Socialism” and
that it “teaches people to respect the consensus, and not to sabotage
it.”

 

“We have no ethical standards in education, and no rules for sexual
behaviour,” in the words of Dr Gösta Rodhe, the then head of the
department of sexual education in the Directorate of Schools, and thus
in some ways the executive officer of government sexual policy. “You
see, since there’s a lack of tension in Swedish politics, younger
people have got to find release and excitement in sexual tension
instead.”

 

This was in the early 1970s. Things have gotten worse in the two
generations since then. Socialists and state authorities present this
policy as liberation of women and sexual liberation. What it is
actually about is breaking down rival sources of power: The
traditional Judeo-Christian culture and the nuclear family. This
leaves the state more powerful, since it can regulate all aspects of
life and, most importantly, can indoctrinate the nation’s children as
it sees fit, without undue parental influence. The state replaces your
entire nuclear and extended family, raises your children and cares for
your elderly.

 

As writer Per Bylund observes: “A significant difference between my
generation and the preceding one is that most of us were not raised by
our parents at all. We were raised by the authorities in state daycare
centers from the time of infancy; then pushed on to public schools,
public high schools, and public universities; and later to employment
in the public sector and more education via the powerful labor unions
and their educational associations. The state is ever-present and is
to many the only means of survival – and its welfare benefits the only
possible way to gain independence.”

 

Socialist pioneer Alva Myrdal is the hero of the modern Swedish
preschools. She wanted comprehensive education for special child
carers who could provide children with competent guidance all day
long. What the social engineers discovered later was that despite
decades of state-sponsored gender equality propaganda, boys and girls
still behaved differently. This disturbed them. Instead of concluding
that maybe there are genuine, innate differences between the sexes,
which sensible people would do, they decided to indoctrinate children
more thoroughly, starting at an even earlier age, to eradicate gender
differences.

 

Toy researcher Anders Nelson at Sweden’s Royal Institute of Technology
has warned that toys have become increasingly gender-segregated over
the past fifteen years: “People often explain [their toy purchases] by
saying that boys and girls want different things. But in order for
children to be able to reflect on [the toys] they receive, adults have
to open their eyes to [inherent gender] structures. To children, these
[gender] roles are more unquestioned and instinctual.” Mr. Nelson
encouraged parents to give more gender neutral Christmas presents. In
other words, no Barbie dolls for girls and no cars for boys.

 

The Swedish Consumers Association reacted angrily to a
star-shaped,pink ice-cream because it represented gender-profiling.
“Girlie, GB’s new ice pop, is pink and has make-up inside the stick.
It says a lot about what GB thinks about girls and how they should
be,” the association said in a statement. According to them, Sweden
does not need more products that reinforce existing prejudices about
sex roles, so they asked the producer to make the product less gender
specific.

 

Again, this has thus absolutely nothing to do with “tolerance or
diversity.” It’s done in order to break you down and to mold you into
a new human being. Great emphasis is placed on destroying the
Christian heritage of the native population. Pupils are taught that
they have been liberated from the superstition and oppression of
Christian nonsense. However, while Christianity has been ridiculed and
demonized for generations, so much that some Swedish Christians
complain about persecution, Islam is presented in textbooks as a
benevolent and tolerant religion, and Islam is granted a high degree
of respect in the public sphere.

 

A bus driver in the increasingly Muslim-dominated Swedish town of
Malmö has been fired from his job following revelations that he
stopped a woman from boarding his bus because she was wearing full
Islamic face-covering, which made her hard to identify. In Sweden, it
is thus unacceptable if girls are presented with pink ice-creams or
Barbie dolls because this reinforces gender stereotypes, but the burka
is just fine. Meanwhile, Sweden is in the midst of the most explosive
rape wave in Scandinavian history, largely caused by immigration.
While Swedish girls are called “whores” by Muslim immigrants, Swedish
boys are told to wear a dress and study queer theory.

 

Sweden is supposedly the most “gender equal” country in the world.
It’s also one of the nations most eagerly (at least officially, all
other viewpoints are banned) embracing Multiculturalism. Promoting
“sexual equality” alongside a rapidly growing Muslim minority is going
to become an increasingly challenging balancing act.

 

Sharia-supporters and transvestites of the world unite!

 

Fjordman is a noted Norwegian blogger who has written for many
conservative web sites. He used to have his own Fjordman Blog in the
past, but it is no longer active.

 

http://globalpolitician.com/articled…&cid=3&sid=102