Vanguard News Network

By George Lenz

The value of integrity is often instinctively understood but seldom fully appreciated in a White Nationalist organization. This quality is not always easy to define, yet its presence or absence can make or break the organization.

The ideology of the White Nationalists differentiates them from the democrats and communists, but prospective members will also use our own integrity or absence of it as a proxy to the value of Our Message, since the others routinely heap scorn on our position.

It’s easy to make a mistake here that a large number of “respectable” WN organizations do, by accepting as the benchmark the jewish definition of “responsibility,” which of course always excludes the preservation of the white race as a legitimate political aim. Since we can never be “respectable” according to the people who run the press, we must take double care for our personal integrity, since “investigators” will usually be prejudiced against us, thanks to the jew-poisoned wells they’ve been served from.

A WN organization is not a mechanical-democratic one but an authoritarian-organic one, and thus functions not through various legalistic means, which eventually destroy or deform the concept of Aryan integrity, but through the selection and promotion of men of strong character and morals to the positions of authority, where they are entrustd with sufficient powers to carry their mission to the benefit of the community, volk and race.

Thus, the leader of a WN organization has far greater powers than the leader of a democratic organization. In particular, he can remove anyone from the organization without giving a reason.

Yet, this does not mean that he is expected to use this authority often; actually this authority can be expected to be used only in one case – treason to Movement or the particular WN organization in question.

The deal that is offered to a member of a WN organization is simple: he must adhere to and actively promote the mission of the organization and regularly pay membership dues in return for staying with an organization as long as it pleases him. The WN organization is neither interested in character deficiencies of a particular member, insofar they do not run counter to membership requirements, nor does it prefer to recruit more able and successful members over less able and successful ones – everyone willing to join a WN organization should have work to do.

While the level of a member’s contribution and performance could and should determine his promotion, the fact that he is limited in what he can contribute should not be grounds for dismissal from a WN organization.

Breaking a membership deal is a wrong thing to do for a WN leader, and generally results in the extinction of the organization in question, since loss of integrity it entails is deadly, especially in the modern environment. Integrity is the bedrock of a successful WN organization.

* * *

American manufacturing is disappearing, and what is left is more like small factories with 19th-century technology and low pay than 20th-century huge industrial enterprises with decent pay: the recent academic research tend to support this view. While foreign competition is a well-researched factor, another factor is much less researched, let alonge accounted for: healthcare costs rising through the roof, making manufacturing companies unprofitable and eventually bankrupt in all industrialized countries. Financing requires an increasing part of company profits and government budgets; and healthcare costs can become unbearable. So what should be done? The main effective solutions are painful, yet essential: the sooner they are implemented, the better:

1) All government medical assistance programs, like Medicare and Medicaid, should be terminated, and private medical insurance limited to instances where it actually works: for injuries and other routine surgical operations, not chronic diseases. Benefits should also be lowered. Healthcare is a privilege, not a right, and each citizen’s own responsibility; and insurance can work only with rare statistically predictable events, which is not the case with chronic diseases. What local government can do is to encourage opening of charitable hospitals for the poor, staffed by volunteers.

2) The medical profession should be deregulated: membership and certification issued by AMA should be voluntary, not obligatory, and the completion of MD degree or equivalent shall be the only pass required to enter a medical profession. Also any control over drugs by FDA should be terminated.

3) The concept of healthcare for the elderly shall be completely changed: the goal of such healthcare should be to provide for natural and honorable death, not to artificially prolong life at skyrocketing costs. Doctors shall be encouraged to limit healthcare to persons aged 65 and more to palliative medicine and routine medical procedures, and undertake operations only if paid in full by patients. Also voluntary suicide (euthanasia) laws should be adopted to shield from zealous democratic persecution those far-sighted and honourable MDs, who help their patients to end their lives in a dignified way. Natural death associations shall be formed at local level, to explain to the elderly the benefits of the natural and honourable death over painful and sorrowful existence through expensive artificial means, often at the expense of their relatives, and to help them undertake this important mission.

A good place to start is each WN’s own life. For those of us who are younger, this means replacing health insurance with life insurance with returned premiums, exploring natural childbirth options at home, and finding a private practice where it is possible to get medical care at a reasonable cost. For those of us who are longer, this means consciously refusing various invasive and expensive medical procedures, opting for a natural death in a family circle instead.

* * *

Euro has finally reached the rate of USD/EUR 1.294 – the ceiling of a corridor of 1.20-1.30USD where it’s artificially kept by informal agreement of the central banks. The dollar is significantly overvalued: fundamentals price it at between 1.40 and 1.45 USD per euro, yet the agreement has kept it within the corridor so far. Having opened a long euro position at 1.19 a year and a half ago, expecting euro appreciation to the level justified by fundamentals, and I kept it though these 18 month, and intend to increase it further. Even if this time the agreement would keep the USD/EUR rate within the corridor, economic fundamentals would eventually force it to adjust, delivering reasonable profit. Yet I would give 70% probability that it would happen within the next six month, and 60% probability that it would happen in the next 6-8 weeks. Thus my recommendation for the EUR is strong buy.