Vanguard News Network

And under torture, the sheeple there would still swear that we are all the same under the thin veneer of skin.

In old industrial America, the industrial corporations were responsible for importing the diversity.

Socialist parties have always been the ones pushing for mass immigration, in all western nations. Funny how some left-leaning WNs will always pretend the blame lies with corporations, who throughout history have favored protectionism and been run by patriotic leaders. It is only late in time, as the socialists and the workers who vote for them won the political game, that corporations have caved in along with everyone else.

Then along comes the worker, now a bit dismayed that he has to share the loot with looters from other countries as well, and decides to do a little rewriting of history….

Carp: You don’t know what you are talking about—there would have been no post WWI immigration act if the labor unions had not pushed for one starting with the mass migration to the US of questionable “whites” in the 1880’s. In other words American unions were the only real political force that for 40 years pushed for highly restrictive immigration quotas.

Itz only been very recently with the jew led SEIU, and other jew led unions getting the upper hand in the AFL—that there has been a change in position on immigration by the AFL. Btw, this jew made immigration policy has no support among the rank & file membership, and the jews know it.

The unions, for years, also fought the use of colored scabs, and foreign scabs by the corporations.

It was a corporate tactic to go down south and load up a train load of colored scabs in box cars and use them to break unions during strike situations all over the US & even in southern states. To a lesser or same extent the corporations used mestizos, and, orientals as scabs in the western states.

Also, it is my opinion that there would have been no CIO created in the 1930’s if there had been no restrictive immigration act passed in 1922.

sgruber, that was the best synopsis of “economic man” i’ve ever read. thanks.

van helsing Says: “Nowadays (multinational) corporatized agricultural concerns like to have a steady stream of cheap gummint subsidized labor… which happens to resent and attack and live/feed off the actual inhabitants.”

Somebody suggested that those of us with backyards or small acreage could raise chickens and fish or grow tomatoes, potatoes, radishes and greens, then trade the surplus for goods and services provided by comrades living in apartments, condos and trailers. Somebody else (Kievsky?) wrote something about urbanites growing herbs on patios, decks and pots hung from walls. This seems like a good idea to me. A logical place to start would be in and around small towns like Kirksville. It would put a dent in corporate agriculture if the idea spread to larger communities like Springfield or Rolla throughout the country. What can the ZOG do? Criminalize “gift-giving”? So fucking what! Let the cocksuckers try it! Fuck them and corporate agriculture’s preference for filthy, e coli-carrying, staphylococcus-infected, murderous, raping, pedophiliac, dollar an hour Mestizos! The problem is, where can a white nationalist find 2, 3 or 4 agriculture-types who are willing to help get the ball rolling on this?