Vanguard News Network

Nietzsche archived at marxist.org Great.

In the meantime they are, rather, wanting and wishing, even with some importunity, to be absorbed and assimilated by and into Europe…
Fleas like dogs too.

…they are longing to be finally settled, permitted, respected somewhere and to put an end to the nomadic life, to the `Wandering Jew’ -;

Let them fly to IZ.
http://66.249.93.104/search?q=cache:ZnoP2nSsBJ4J:www.marxists.org/reference/archive/nietzsche/1886/beyond-good-evil/ch08.htm+What+Europe+owes+to+the+Jews%3F+-+Many+things,+good+and+bad,&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1

“Geoff”: Once upon a time there were Tammany Societies all over the United States. Tom Pendergast’s machine, probably had started out as a Tammany Society in the 19th century. Not all Tammany Societies were called by the name Tammany. Some were called by other indian names, some called Sons of Liberty, others called republican clubs with a small “r” not to be confused with today’s Republicoons & coonservatives.

These clubs were Jeffersonian in politics, political-social in nature, and their origins seem to have been with rank & file of the Continental Army, and what was known as the “farmers & mechanics” that made up the political backbone of the American Revolution.

Anyone could, and, still can form a Tammany “type” Society.

Today with the computer and the copying machine even the smallest “Tammany” club, with a few bright members, could have significant impact in local and even state elections. It might not even be what you do—it might be what you might do. It could easily open the door to public and private sector jobs and positions. Next thing you know you are being taken seriously.

TTIND 18 makes the point that, quoting Carl Schmitt, that decisions made in the absence of democracy are, in fact, the decisions of a dictatorship.

As we enter into The Age of the Soft Totalitarians, it is useful to note that ALL of the nonelected decisionmaking chokepoints in our society are controlled by a people who are absolutely opposed to us, and are our RACIAL enemies.

The question logically follows, “If we ARE in a Soft Dictatorship, what can be done?”

I think the major societal trend lines are not just opposed to us, but ACTIVELY opposed in our neutralization, today, and our negation, tomorrow.

That’s “Our” as in “RACE.”

What i like about Peter Shank, Alex Linder, and, yes, even – perhaps particularly – the NSM, is that we are finally developing an Awareness of The Trap, and are not allowing the Enemy to define us to his satisfaction.

This point can not be overemphasized; for FIFTY YEARS the Goddamned Patriotards have done EXACTLY NOTHING to have any sort of effect whatsoever on the mopve by the Jewish RACE to fulfill the Jewish policy of tikkun olam – the remaking of OUR society over in THEIR image, at all levels of all institutions in our society.

This is all the more true in the case of the Soft Totalitarians – where a Federal judiciary can ORDER the taxpayers to spend billions of dollars in support of their (VERY pro-Jewish) social experiments, knowing that he will be totally supported by the Jewish-controlled media, and the Jewish-controlled politicians; in short, an unelected Elite uses an unelected Elite to make the country over in their image.

I suspect this is why so many White people are going slowly insane; they have been TOLD one thing – “We live in a democracy, where the majority rules through their choices at the ballot box” – when ALL of their SENSES show them something ELSE – “We live in a controlled oligrachy, where maybe 300 people really determine everything that matters, and they totally support the Jewish Agenda, which is specifically and violently anti-White and anti-Western, AND is very anti-Christian.”

Yet, the Propasphere reinforces ONE Virtual Reality – “Jews are wonderful! Blacks are great!” – while the REAL Reality keeps trying to get him to pay attention – “These people are thieves, and liars; the other people are violent monsters who destroy everything they touch!”

We can “vote” as a matter of Form; as a matter of Substance, if those votes don’t go the right way, our Masters will simply ignore them, and have a Federal judge overturn the election; this is hardly what the Founders had in mind.

Yet, the Founders also wanted the country to be run by the men who owned the country; educated, aristocratic, and groomed to rule with the perspective of the long view in terms of the growth of the RACE.

Now, it seems, we have gone full circle in the opposite direction; we have a democracy that is ruled by an unelected Elite, that hates us to an extent we could barely imagine, and uses the votes of illegals and hostile colored to destroy all our ancestors fought and died to create, and develop.

Schmitt, describing the Weimar situatiomn from a constitutional perspective, noted that “…the crisis springs from the consequences of modern mass democracy and in the final analysis from the contradiction of a liberal individualism burdened by moral pathos and a democratic sentiment governed essentially by political ideals.”

The pathos of our situation is obvious; the “democratic sentiment” in OUR situation does not flow organically from ONE people acting in their NATIONAL (i.e.; RACIAL) interest; rather, it is forced, inorganically, from a group that needs the Form of Union, with the Substance of Disunion to the point of RACIAL Enmity. The fact remains, the Mexicans in America are turning America into Mexico, and this choice move to a moment when it is inexorable…

The Solution seems to be to build our own NATION, culturally, inside the American country, for now; one day, it will be OUR NATION AND OUR COUNTRY.

New America!

An Idea Whose Time Is Here!

Craig Cobb wrote: “Nietzsche archived at marxist.org Great.

In the meantime they are, rather, wanting and wishing, even with some importunity, to be absorbed and assimilated by and into Europe…
Fleas like dogs too.

…they are longing to be finally settled, permitted, respected somewhere and to put an end to the nomadic life, to the `Wandering Jew’ -;

Let them fly to IZ.”

Are you even capable of uttering a coherent sentence? You write like an acid casualty from the 60’s.

Amalekite:

You summarized well one theme of the broadcast: that dictatorships can express popular sentiment as well or better than democracies. This is the main point to the broadcast.

I left intentionally vague my views on the matter. I wanted the listeners to come to their own conclusions about democracy. I wanted to show them the weaknesses of democracy.

As you know we are under 24×7 propaganda barrage which tells us that only democracy is acceptable. In rebuttal I say no! Democracy is flawed and dangerous.

Though, I often privately think only a White racialist dictator can turn the ship around and save what remains of the White race. Only a dictator can form and mold a popular movement to challenge our foes, otherwise it is divide and conquer.

I did not express the view explicitly in the broadcast, I wanted listeners to come to their own conclusions.