Vanguard News Network

The real test will be Iran. Fool me once, shame on Jew. Fool me twice, shame on me. If we attack Iran right after the fiasco that is Iraq, there truly is no hope. What do you do when AmeriKwa tries to draft you? 1) go get the free military training so you can be a better insurgent some day 2) go to jail (many great men — like Hitler — have spent time in prison 3) flee the country or try to hide in it 4) Go fight for Iran

The posting deleted the two sentences referred to above. Here they are:

>

Marie Antoinette – I thought she said it, but she wasn’t referring to expensive (birthday?) cakes, she was referring to the caked crumbs stuck to the sides of the ovens after the bread is removed.

re: O’Farrell ‘column’: OK: not too bad of a read with a coupla caveats: O’Farrell seems to be falling into the ‘ZOG-approved’ trap of ‘Moslem smear’: i.e: the ad-hom of naming someone as a ‘Muslim’ and, ergo, ‘a terrorist’……..when the line of demarcartion IS NOT ‘religion’ but ‘race’……..for instance: Jews are terrorists per se because it is in their GENES to kill, steal & destroy: especially white goyim. Although most Muslims are non-white, the criteria is RACE…..which is, of course, something you can’t convert to!
re: the 7/7 London bombings: from what i can determine, the evidence points to, once again, ‘an inside job’ courtesy of MI6 (viz: MOSSAD). Apparently, bombs were planted UNDER the trains (which was ALSO the case in the Madrid bombings)
That means there were NO ‘suicide bombers’ as such…..also: it means that some-one had to have access to the trains at the marshalling yards where there would, undoubtedly, have been all sorts of security….the by-passing of which would require much more than a few home-grown sand niggas…..so: again: as O’Farrell says:
“Cui bono?”
“Jui bono?”

re: Carpenter & French revolution……
this was a ZOG ‘dry-run’ for Russia 1917-
…..Sir Walter Scott’s two-vlm biography of Napoleon names the KIKE as the movers, shakers and, once again, the TERRORISTS, behind the now-familiar ZOG-hallmark of white genocide!

‘Jackumup’ says:
“To beat them is to take away the desire to accumulate unnesissary material goods eliminating the need for thier talent of buying ,selling & lending”

here’s ONE good method…….dumpster diving
i.e: rummaging through the dumpsters outside super-markets and ‘shopping malls’. I know it sounds a bit gross but many super-markets discard perfectly good produce, groceries, clothes, toiletries, toys, electrical equipment, whatever….because there is some slight blemish or it is near or a few days past the ‘use by’ date(which, AFA de-hydrated and canned goods are concerned, is probably inaccurate any-ways!). Think of the ADVANTAGES…..you automatically BREAK the ZOG-consumerist-cycle….work…pay ZOG taxes…..what’s left over: pay vastly inflated prices to buy ‘necessities'(most of which are CRAP any-way)….thereby increase the wealth of ZOG thus aiding and abetting the ZOG agenda of pauperisng/enslaving the White Race. You also save HEAPS of money: a dedicated ‘dumpster diver’ living in a squat, for instance, or living with friends/relations or wherever can live on as little as $US20 a week…..the savings can be used for more useful items like: guns, ammunition, stockpiles of…whatever……white power literature and flyers to distribute where-ever……the purchase of ‘portable assets’ like gold/silver bullion &c to ward off the coming ZOG-MEGA-COLLAPSE!
All MUCH BETTER than en-riching the bank account of some fat, slimy, greasy, filthy JEW BASTARD!

Sandor, I would suggest a Google search for “french revolution atrocities”. Here are two links:

http://www.city-journal.org/html/16_2_urbanities-robespierre.html
http://www.culturewars.com/CultureWars/Archives/Fidelity_archives/parricide.html

On Vendee, where a revolt was beaten down, every man, woman and child was killed, even Republicans as all had to be cleansed:

Another amusement for the “Bleus,” who referred to themselves as colonies infernales, was to roast women and children in baking ovens. In order to get maximal sadistic pleasure from this practice, the victims were placed in cold ovens, which were then heated.
……
In the Vendee, however, a particularly popular sport among the Blues was to throw children out of windows and to catch them with their bayonets. Equally popular was the practice of slicing open pregnant women in order to chop their unborn children into pieces and then let the mothers bleed to death. Other pregnant women were crushed to death in wine and fruit presses. Also popular was the burning of victims in houses and churches. This bloodlust increased so vehemently that Commander Grignon gave the order that everyone they met was to be immediately killed, even if they were Republicans.

The whole thing started with a few years of harsh winters and bad harvest, which caused starvation. Also, France had spent a great deal of money in helping the American Patriots beat the British. How coincidental history is, sometimes: without the last cold winter, none of this would have happened.

The Jacobins and Girondins (clubs of intellectuals that met at coffee shops in Paris) essentially betrayed the people. The people loved the king and did not want to overthrow the monarchy. This is shown by a typical scene: a large crowd of women was supposed to go to Versailles and fetch the royal family; once in Paris, the king would see the people’s hardships and help them, the Parisians believed. Off they went, a train of women, along with many men dressed in women’s clothing and many who didn’t bother to disguise themselves. At Versailles the royal family stupidly let them inside the gates, and the crowd killed their guards and put their heads on pikes. The royal family was brought to Paris, prisoners in reality, though they were allowed to bring with them a long list of servants. The people in Paris cheered, and the French tricoleur was born as a combination of Versailles white and Parisian red and blue. (It is not a symbol for “liberty, equality and fraternity.” That is a lie you will hear as the true story, that the French commoners weren’t hostile to the royal family, doesn’t fit in with the narrative.

The royal family was eventually executed, when large crowds of royalists started rioting and causing unrest. The Jacobinians were afraid the people would rally around the king and put an end to their reign. The royal family was not executed simply because a revolution was going on, as that would have upset the people. A long list of crimes was invented, such as that the king would have conspired with foreign armies to invade France, and that the queen would have taught her children to masturbate. (“I appeal to the decency of all the women in this court,” Marie-Antoinette appealed during the trial, and a silence came over the crowd of onlookers as embarrassment over the ridiculous charge spread.)

It is noteworthy that many of the initial leaders of the revolution were themselves killed under Robespierre’s Reign of Terror. During La Terreur, Robespierre sought to change everything: measurements, the calendar (ten days in a week, three weeks in a month, leaving five days of the year which were Republican holidays), religion (the goddess of Reason was laughed at), every institution, even the laws of economics (price controls forced many out of business in the affected branches). The early leaders had only sought more votes for the Third Estate in the National Assembly, at the expense of the nobility and priests, and tax reforms. Here started the Left and Right in politics: those sitting to the Right in the National Assembly were more moderate reformers. These were soon dead.

Napoleon rose to the rank of general by killing royalists rioting in Paris. He was a political genius, that much is clear: without him, the monarchy would probably have been restored much sooner. Now it had to wait until after the Napoleonic wars.

PS Nesta Webster’s book, ISBN 0939482096, available from Noontide Press is probably the most accessible and informative from a White Nationalist perspective.

Can we get back to the topic of American today?

The jew-controlled media is mind-washing hard for the Mexcrement amnesty. One senator actually read the bill – and almost had a heart attack. Sen. Sessions has called attention to the horrific nation-wrecking the beaner amnesty would be.

So what does jew do? Blast Sessions as an evil “rassist”! Oy!

http://isteve.blogspot.com/2006/05/sen-sessions-commits-unpardonable-hes.html

I like Stevie’s last line about this agitprop bitch “reporter”: “Seriously, this country is not going to get back on the right track until much of the Establishment is purged from their sinecures.”

Purged…I like the sound of that. “Dana Milbank.” Sounds like the Simpsons character. “Milbanks.” LOL

Nesta Webster has written a whole book on the French Revolution thereby pointing out the role of the Jews. You can read that book online here:

http://www.yamaguchy.netfirms.com/webster/webster.html

A good introduction to the jewish role in the French Revolution might be a chapter of Captain Ramsay´s classic book The Nameless War. You can read the book here:

http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/wars/nameless/intro.htm

Juri Lina writes quite a lot of the Jewish role in the French Revolution in his book The Rise of the Red Scorpion.

I think all these sources don´t give the whole picture. And I would assume the Jewish role might well be greater as these authors suggest. You can hate the Jews as much as you want you have to admit that they generally don´t brag about their deeds outside of their community. That´s why nodal parts of the assassination of Kennedy and of 911 are still unexplained. Perhaps the Jews will open their archives when they rule the world undisputed out of Jerusalem. That might make most history books pretty obsolete. But I would prefer we would beat the Jews and have a false history.

I know it sounds rather kooky to assert the historic role of secret societies. But isn´t Jewry a giant secret society? And most people don´t know this. And if you read the classic books on freemasonry, the books of Wichtl and Ludendorff for example, which played a major role in the intellectual background of the NSDAP (the SS had an archive of books on freemasonry, Evola worked there for a short time), you must come to the conclusion that Freemasonry is an important part of the jewish conspiracy. I doubt that Freemasonry is kind of a country club as “Carpenter” suggests. The minor levels of Freemasonry might well be unimportant but not the upper echelons. It might be that now the role of Freemasonry is not so great as it has been, because the Jews don´t need Non-Jews as much as before and they can hire their puppets without an esoteric smokescreen. But I think the role of Freemasonry is still there. And it certainly was an important part of the French Revolution.

I have now read Nesta Webster’s description of Freemasonry, and its role in the French Revolution.

FREEMASONRY: Nesta Webster claims that the symbols of Freemasonry are derived from the Cabala – an earlier form of Cabala, “not at all incompatible with Christianity,” not the latter form that Rabbis mixed with magic. This is what she provides as concrete proof of a connection to Judaism. She theorizes about Templars bringing the symbolism to Britain, after the fall of their order – the Templars got hold of that symbolism while in Jerusalem. Or, she says, possibly it could have come from a Jewish friend of Oliver Cromwell. Along the way she dismisses many other theories, but not entirely. “To sum up, then, the origins of the system we now know as Freemasonry are not to be found in one source alone. The twelve alternative sources enumerated in the Masonic Cyclopædia and quoted at the beginning of this chapter may all have contributed to its formation.”

So she provides no names of Jews in Freemasonry, nothing of that kind. Symbolism from the Cabala many centuries ago – well, could be. But that is not enough for us to call Freemasonry a conspiracy run by Jews. Note that Nesta Webster herself does not think of these various symbols as incompatible with Christianity or Europe, and she does not cite them as proof of Freemasonry being a Jewish tool.

THE FRENCH REVOLUTION: Nesta Webster quotes a British Freemason, John Robison, who wrote a book in the 18th century about subversives gathering in German and French lodges that he had visited. This, he said, was anathema to Freemasonry, which had always held that nothing touching on religion or politics should ever be uttered in the lodges.

Quintin Craufurd, a friend of Marie Antoinette, wrote in a letter to Pitt in 1794 that the beliefs of the revolutionaries were similar to the beliefs of the Illuminati, that Weishaupt had founded in Germany. From this Nesta Webster concludes that Illuminati doctrines must have been imported to France through Freemasons. From this, some WNs draw the conclusion that the French Revolution was a Jewish conspiracy.

Weishaupt was indeed a Jew. But that is far from enough evidence of a Jewish conspiracy; you could just as well say that Weishaupt was affected by other thinkers of the time, such as Voltaire. The Enlightenment was already well established. Note, also, that many in Europe, Freemasons and others, were highly influenced by the American Revolution – you could make the claim that the overthrow of the French monarchy was an American conspiracy, works just as well as anything else. One Jew in the game does not a conspiracy make.

The strongest ideological influence on the French Revolution was beyond all doubt Voltaire. He was not a Jew. He did join the Freemasons, but only shortly before his death in 1778. Why is it that some are so ready to forget the widespread influence of this famous thinker?

Mirabeau and two other founders of the Jacobins were indeed Freemasons, and other Jacobins were as well. However, I doubt that all Jacobins were Freemasons, as Webster claims – she provides no proof of this, and as the Jacobins grew in numbers…. Still, even if every one of the Jacobins would have been a Freemason, as Nesta Webster quotes from John Robinson these members of the Freemasons were of a perverted kind; their subversive thoughts on politics were not allowed in larger Freemasonry.

Nesta Webster also mentions considerable differences in opinion among the Jacobins – hardly a uniform conspiracy. Robespierre would later execute several Jacobins, until other Jacobins, along with other leaders, turned against him.

The Girondins, the second of the large clubs behind the Revolution was not a Freemason invention, as Nesta Webster notes, although they certainly worked closely together with the Jacobins. These, too, had differences in opinion, and Girondine thought changed over time, and some were executed while others were not. Again, hardly a uniform conspiracy.

The only Jew we see here is a certain Ephraim, who was sent to contact the revolutionaries on behalf of the king of Prussia. He was arrested for libel and for plotting against the queen, spent two days in jail and was then sent back to Prussia.

In short: the only Jewish influence Nesta Webster describes in Freemasonry consists of Freemasons adopting certain symbols and some rituals from the old form of Cabala.

Nesta Webster does not describe any particular Jewish influence in the French Revolution.

Nesta Webster claims that the Jacobins were founded by a small group of Freemasons, but also says that their political debates were anathema to real Freemasonry, which stayed out of politics and religion altogether.

Nesta Webster makes a claim that will seem naïve to a White Nationalist – she claims that these perverted French Freemasons would be the origin of Marxism. She provides no more proof of this than any of her other leaps of faith: “Certainly it has to be…” etc.

Though I do not dismiss her writings, she writes a lot that is interesting.

Sehnsucht, I have now read the chapter from Nameless War that deals with the French Revolution.

The author’s proof of Jews controlling the French Revolution is – that the Protocols of Zion says “it was wholly the work of our hands.” Come on! The Protocols was written by a Russian who sought to warn the world of Jewish tactics and intentions. Mostly very insightful – I have read most of it – but it was not written by a secret Jewish world government of elders.

All this NW chapter gives as concrete evidence is the names of a couple of Jews involved in banking in France. And that is presented as evidence that the French Revolution was controlled by Jews!

What, then, of all the other states where Jews were bankers, where revolutions did not take place? If the presence of Jewish bankers = Jews control politics, then it would seem these Jewish controllers wanted the monarchies intact, except in France.

Actually, there was ambivalence toward the Jews among the Jacobins and Girondins. Especially the Jacobins from Alsace were vehemently opposed to Jewish emancipation, when Mirabeau and a couple of others argued in favor of it. The Jews were eventually emancipated, but several bankers in Bordeaux who had sided with the Girondins against the Jacobins were persecuted and fined severely. At other times wealthy Jews were attacked by the mobs and their leaders, just like they attacked anyone with money. Again, as I wrote above: hardly a uniform conspiracy, is it?

With absolutely no proof the chapter in NW insinuates that the king’s minister of finance was a Jew, just because he came from Germany. Now this is funny: the highly popular Necker was not a revolutionary at all.

The chapter also says that the Illuminati “was … behind freemasonry”. In fact, the short-lived Illuminati was only loosely connected to the much older Freemasonry, thanks to Baron Adolph von Knigge. (He was not a Jew)

The whole chapter consists of loose assumptions, based on this logic: “Jews were behind the Illuminati, the Illuminati controlled the Freemasons, the Freemasons controlled the revolution.”

The author even writes of Robespierre having a prominent position in a Parisian synagogue. Robespierre was vehemently anti-religion, and invented his own worship of Reason. There is no source anywhere that says Robespierre would be a member of a synagogue – and why should he, he wasn’t a Jew. This Nameless War author can’t even spell Robespierre; he writes it “Robes Pierre,” which is funny since in French it means “Female Dresses, Pierre.”

what sort of ‘proof’ do you expect to exist concerning the connection between the Jews and the French Revolution any-way?

Ah. Just as I expected; after a long discussion where no evidence is presented, and where I alone go through the material offered, we see the “Believe or you’re a heretic!” argument. Complete with sarcasm: “The Jews control all Western media, in case you didn’t know? Or don’t you think there is sufficient extant evidence to verify this?”

Gee, Jimbo, why do you think I’m here? Because I know Jews dominate U.S. media, and the media in many other Western nations. How do I know that? Because there is proof of it; the names of these Jews are well documented. Just like the names of the Jews involved in Bolshevism, and in other communist movements of the 19th and early 20th century, and Jews involved in the civil rights movement, and Jews in neoconnism. According to you, Jews won’t allow any such evidence of their involvement to exist. And yet, there it is. But not in the French Revolution.

It would have been impossible to suppress information about Jewish dominance of the French Revolution, as it happened so long ago, and it would have been spread all over the White world long before the 20th century. French anti-Semites, living in the most anti-Semitic of all West European nations, would definitely have mentioned it over the last centuries – but reading Nationalist material from France (Yes, I speak French, unlike you I bet) I have found nothing pointing to Jews controlling the Revolution.

The German National Socialists would surely also have mentioned it. But guess what? They didn’t. Because all the major players in the French Revolution were White. That’s right: Whites can, on occasion, act in ways that are anti-conservative and even anti-White.

I tire of this. There is plenty to hold against the Jews, well-documented charges presented by men like Pierce. Jewish influence has been noted in numerous time periods and changes. That doesn’t mean we have to assume it’s everywhere or else be labeled heretics.

I have gone through the material offered, because it is an important subject; took me a couple of hours. Something tells me you have not, Jimbo. Would take too long, wouldn’t it? You already have your beliefs ready to warm your heart, you don’t need no stinkin’ facts.

And you finish your post with “Cui bono?” Gimme a break. That’s what the accuser always says when he has nothing to offer. Cui bono, let’s see … Britain, Austria, Spain, Prussia, Italy – all enemies of France. So according to your “cui bono”-logic, they were all behind the French Revolution. Right?

so saith ‘Carpenter’ (again!):
*”Ah. Just as I expected; after a long discussion where no evidence is presented, and where I alone go through the material offered, we see the ‘Believe or you’re a heretic!’ argument”*

whoa up there Cochise! The purpose of my post was not ‘evidence’ but to address how ‘historical material’ is interpreted
(and, BTW, you conveniently mis-define ‘evidence’: for an event as far in the past as The French Revolution there can be NO evidence……only historical material of varying degrees of reliability which support a conclusion based on the balance of probabilities….EVIDENCE is something that can be used to test a theory in a laboratory!)

*”Complete with sarcasm: ‘The Jews control all Western media, in case you didn’t know? Or don’t you think there is sufficient extant evidence to verify this?’ “*

well now…..the ‘sarcasm’ is surely ‘in the eye of the beholder’?

*”Gee, Jimbo, why do you think I’m here? Because I know Jews dominate US media, and the media in many other Western nations. How do I know that? Because there is proof of it; the names of these Jews are well documented”*

And?….once again: this is something that can be demonstrated
QED in the here and now. What happened or didn’t happen 250yrs or so ago cannot.

*”Just like the names of the Jews involved in Bolshevism and in other communist movements of the 19th and early 20th century and Jews involved in the civil rights movement, and Jews in neoconnism. According to you, Jews won’t allow any such evidence of their involvement to exist. And yet, there it is. But not in the French Revolution”*

now come on there…..if u read my post(and NOT READING stuff is what you are accusing me of, BTW!)…..you will read this: “The involvement of the kikes in the Russian Revolution, for instance, was only revealed because the likes of Anthony C Sutton un-covered numerous US diplomatic telegrams while laboriously sifting through the Library of Congress”
So: firstly: such evidence was only exhumed after EXHAUSTIVE investigations by committed,determined and able people.
Secondly, even post-WWI, the dissemination of information was a QUANTUM JUMP if not several QUANTUM JUMPS more advanced than during The French Revolution…..telephones, international telegraphy, mass circulation newspapers and books….&c &c….or are you trying to tell me that the yoos allowed such material to appear regularly in banner headlines all over the Western World? And, yet, people still had to DIG and DIG DEEP to un-cover it! For yoos ‘involved in the civil rights movement and neo-conism’ we HAVE ANOTHER quantum leap in information with television and the internet…..yr confusing two different time periods and two different issues….and: MY POINT STILL STANDS….yooish involvement in ‘the civil rights movement and neo-conism’ IS NOT SOMETHING that the great mass of white patriotards know or care to know. Believe it or not, those who know this are STILL a small minority…….perhaps less than 15% of the population.

*”It would have been impossible to suppress information about Jewish dominance of the French Revolution, as it happened so long ago and it would have been spread all over the White world long before the 20th century. French anti-Semites, living in the most anti-Semitic of all West European nations, would definitely have mentioned it over the last centuries”*

nonsense! the VERY FACT that it WAS so long ago means that there would be LITTLE or NO information on the rôle of the Jews extant. How could the information “have been spread all over the White world long before the 20th century” without THE MEANS to do so? Modern information technology is A MAJOR HEAD-ACHE for the Jew World Order. Their increasingly frantic efforts to ‘control’ the Internet clearly demonstrate that they are on a hiding to nothing here and that, like a greased pig, ‘the technology’ keeps getting away from them. People living in those far-off days had NO SUCH LUXURY…..in fact: the LITERACY RATE was probably @ or near to-day’s Turd World levels……somewhat less than ¼ of the adult population IF THAT!

*”but reading Nationalist material from France (Yes, I speak French, unlike you I bet) I have found nothing pointing to Jews controlling the Revolution”*

‘nationalist material from France’?
Hope yr not referring to publications originating from Le Pen’s organisation? Highly un-likely THEY’d be naming the KIKE….seeing as how they have kikes working for them…..as for any other orgs: they’re probably more concerned with getting EATEN ALIVE by Turd Worlders than worrying about what did or did not happen 250-odd yrs ago ….and…oh….BTW….“Yes, I speak French, unlike you I bet”….why don’t you finish emptying the ad-hom bucket there, boyo?!……”I read, un-like you i bet[!]”

*”The German National Socialists would surely also have mentioned it. But guess what? They didn’t. Because all the major players in the French Revolution were White”*
why should they? The Nazis were concerned primarily with their own situation(s) and they had enough to do just awakening people to the central rôle that the yoos were then playing in Talmudic World Bolshevism

*”That’s right: Whites can, on occasion, act in ways that are anti-conservative and even anti-White”*
it’s debatable….if they do so…..it’s because of the yoo……MacDonald’s books (books it might well behove YOU to read!) for instance say that the greatest current achievement of the yoos is to get modern Americans thinking, talking and acting like pseudo-kikes.

*”I tire of this. There is plenty to hold against the Jews, well-documented charges presented by men like Pierce. Jewish influence has been noted in numerous time periods and changes. That doesn’t mean we have to assume it’s everywhere or else be labeled heretics”*

another straw man!……..we only have to ‘assume’ that where there’s anything that adversely affects the White Race: then there lurks the kike…..’lance a social abscess’ and find….guess who?…..a yoo!

*”I have gone through the material offered, because it is an important subject; took me a couple of hours. Something tells me you have not, Jimbo. Would take too long, wouldn’t it? You already have your beliefs ready to warm your heart, you don’t need no stinkin’ facts”*

i’v read NW & similar stuff….by the standards of proof that one would expect for such distant events: for me: the material is sufficient

*”And you finish your post with ‘Cui bono?’ Gimme a break. That’s what the accuser always says when he has nothing to offer. Cui bono, let’s see … Britain, Austria, Spain, Prussia, Italy – all enemies of France. So according to your ‘cui bono’-logic, they were all behind the French Revolution. Right?”*

‘Britain, Austria, Spain, Prussia, Italy – all enemies of France’…proves?….we can write the Brits off for a start….they were totally ‘kike-ised’ WAY BACK….do you deny that the yoos had penetrated most of the courts of Europe by the time of the French Revolution?…this contagion was released from their ghettoes well before these events….while it may some-times be ‘a logical fallacy’ to claim ‘post hoc ergo propter hoc’ in this case i think it is justified….
and: ‘who gains?’: is a major plank in the modus operandi used by detectives world-wide: viz: ‘motive, means, opportunity’……or do you now want to claim THAT’s invalid too?

Okay Jimbo, I’ll let you cool off for a while by not replying to all of that. I was going to, but it’s just you throwing out anything that comes to your mind, as cover for not having a shred of evidence to support your theory. Go ahead, call me a traitor for not believing exactly everything in history has been controlled by Jews as an article of faith. That belief will get you absolutely zero converts, whereas mine follows in the real WN tradition of finding out the truth, not guessing.

In a five-part series on the origins of the Jewish NWO, Kevin Strom claimed that the mass of evidence links Jewry to the French Revolution:

The History and Significance of the New World Orde: Parts I to V
http://www.natall.com/cgi-bin/audio.cgi?year=1996

Yes, I’m aware that’s an argument by authority, but an interesting series of broadcasts, nevertheless.

I will later post my reasons why I firmly bevlieve that the French Revolution was organized by Jewry. In the meantime I might post the chapter Juri Lina book, the correct title is In the Sign of the Scorpion, not the title I have given above. When all his assertions are true, then there can be little discussion about the strong Jewish influence on the Frensh revolution. For those who speak German I might recommend Wolfgang Eggerts Israels Geheimvatikan Volume One for further details of Jewish involvement in the French Revolution.

Regards.

The Illuminati’s First Coup d’Etat

Adam Weishaupt also worked intensively as a member of the Masonic order Grand Orient to prepare a so-called revolution. (Nesta Webster, “The French Revolution”, London, 1919, pp. 20-21.) At the same time, the Illuminati had gained a secure footing in France. A Portuguese Jew, Martinez Paschalis, had formed Illuminati groups all over the country up to 1787. Count Honore Gabriel Riqueti de Mirabeau (alias Leonidas) became the most important Illuminati leader.

Another important Illuminatus, the writer and publisher Johann Joachim Christoph Bode (1730-1793), alias Amelius, had travelled to Paris in the same year to organise the French revolution and to give the go-ahead signal for the rebellion two years later, according to Johannes Rogalla von Bieberstein’s book “Die These von der Verschworung 1776-1945”
(Frankfurt am Main, 1978).

As an Illuminatus, Bode had been successful in making contacts with other freemasons, also in Sweden. He published the first Masonic periodical during the years 1786-1789. He also took part in the Masonic convention in Wilhelmsbad in 1782.
Weishaupt had earlier sent the Jew Giuseppe Balsamo (born 8th June 1743 in Palermo), who presented himself under the false title of Count Alessandro Cagliostro, to France so that the Illuminati would control the French Masonic orders. Cagliostro-Balsamo had been recruited in Frankfurt am Main in 1781. (“The Trail of the Serpent”, Hawthorne, California, 1936, p. 163.) One year earlier he had declared himself leader of the Egyptian freemasonry. Cagliostro also took part in the important
Masonic congress in Paris on the 15th February 1785.
Cagliostro was expelled from France in 1786 in connection with the “necklace affair”. He was jailed in Rome in 1789, after attempting to set up a Masonic lodge and was sentenced to life imprisonment. He died on the 26th August 1795.

Rothschild’s most important lackey, Weishaupt, was also sent to Paris with unlimited funds to bribe capable men, organise a revolt and depose the king. A secret committee was set up at the Masonic convention in February 1785 to co-ordinate the actions of the revolution. It included Saint-Martin, Etrilla, Franz Anton Mesmer, Cagliostro, Mirabeau, Charles Maurice de Talleyrand (actually T. Perigord), Bode, Dahlberg, Baron de
Gleichen, Lavater, Count Louis de Hesse, and representatives of the Grand Orient from Poland and Lithuania. (“The Trail of the Serpent”, p. 73.)

Weishaupt always played a leading role at the Illuminati’s meetings in Paris. He invited thousands of murderers to Paris.
Many lampoons against Queen Marie Antoinette began to circulate in Paris (Svenska Dagbladet, 27th September 1987). After this, leaflets were spread to incite the people to revolt. The aim of the freemasons was to dethrone the king. The propaganda machine was skilfully tended. Marie Antoinette became a symbol of all evil in the kingdom.

These so-called revolutionaries, who worked to undermine the
established order, were often young and many among them were Jews or reemasons, according to the historian Henrik Berggren, Ph. D. (Dagens Syheter, 20th January 1987, Berggren’s “The Grammar of the Revolution”). The three hundred men who seized power under the French Revolution were all Illuminati. (Gerald B. Winrod, “Adam Weishaupt – a
Human Devil”, p. 37.) Marat and Robespierre officially belonged to a “revolutionary” organisation, The embittered. The Association of equals had also been active in Paris since 1786. This organisation had, in the same year, already decided where to imprison the “enemies of the people”.

The revolutionary leaders Mirabeau, Garat, Robespierre, Marat, Danton, Desmoulins and many others were Illuminati, according to Gerald B. Winrod, “Adam Weishaupt – a Human Devil” (p. 36).

According to Nesta Webster, Danton and Mirabeau were originally members of the Masonic lodge Les Amis Reunis (The Reunited Friends), upon which the Illuminati also put their mark. Louis Leon Saint-Just, called one of the fathers of totalitarianism, was also a freemason. The Illuminati took over the Jacobin clubs already in 1789. 152 of these clubs were active on the 10th August 1790, according to the Encyclo-
paedia Britannica. The Jacobins had a centralised network over all France.

The first club was taken over by Weishaupt’s close collaborators Bode and Baron de Busche. The Jacobin funds amounted to 30 million livres in 1791. Honest researchers have pointed out that the history of the Jacobins is in fact a part of the history of the Illuminati. We must not forget that one of Weishaupt’s titles was “Patriarch of the Jacobins”. The Jacobins also wore red caps, which they called “caps of liberty” or Jacobin caps.
According to the still current propaganda, Louis XVI was a merciless and stupid tyrant. In actual fact, he was a kind, well-meaning person, a warmly religious family man and, besides, extremely clever and well-read, according to the French historian Eric Le Nabour’s biography of the king, “Le pouvoir et la fatalite” (“Power and Destiny”). He often read his encyclopaedias. Louis was so near-sighted that he had difficulty
recognising people only a few yards away. He was a good locksmith and had a knowledge of mechanics, which surprised contemporary experts. He liked carpentry and woodwork. The king had no interest in the glamorous aspects of court life. Louis was 16 when he married the 14-year-old Marie Antoinette. He never travelled abroad.

The Illuminati have managed to present as negative a picture of Louis XVI and his France as possible to the post-revolutionary world. It was not the extravagance and wasteful spending of the court that caused the enormous state deficit, but rather France’s support of the American Revolution. The costs of the war against England became astronomical. Louis XVI was the first head of state of the Old World to recognise this new
republic. Gustavus III was the second. Louis XVI had reformed the judicial system, abolished torture in 1788, humanised the prisons and developed the health service. He paved the way
for the fall of the monarchy through constant, small concessions to the freemasons and the Illuminati. The revolution was not organised in a destitute country, but in a flourishing nation. France’s exports had multiplied
ten times during the century. Industry and agriculture had made great advances. The French network of more than 40 000 kilometres of stonepaved roads was admired by an amazed world. (Rene Sedillot, “Le cout de la Revolution francaise” / “The Cost of the French Revolution”, Paris,1986.)

A presage of the catastrophe to come occurred almost exactly a year earlier, on the morning of the 13th July 1788, when a great storm swept across the country. In a few minutes, the temperature dropped 13 degrees, the sun was hidden and hailstones the size of a baby’s head swept over the
richest farming country in the land – 900 000 hectares were affected, trees were uprooted, vineyards destroyed and harvests spoiled. Over a thousand villages suffered. Roofs blew off and church steeples were brought down.

It was not long before the superstitious were proved right – it was a terrible sign of calamity and violent, sudden death. Neither was it a good sign that the price of bread began to rise day by day, hordes of beggars moved along the roads and over 100 000 destitute people found their way to Paris.

Another bad omen was that the winter of 1788-1789 in France was extremely severe. The harbour of Marseille froze over. All traffic between Dover and Calais stopped. The mills iced over and could not grind flour, so that the shortage of bread became disastrous.

This is why the populace could be incited to revolt. The riots went on throughout the winter. On the 1st of March 1789, the 19-year-old lieutenant Napoleon Bonaparte was sent to Dijon to crush a riot but he refused to take the king’s side. He chose to go over to the revolutionaries.

Dark Illuminati forces fomented the riots in the French countryside. The debts owed on the state deficit consumed half of the French budget. All this money found its way into the hands of profiteering Jewish money-lenders. All of these factors were exploited. The time to strike had come for the conspirators, who had united the Jacobin clubs.

As a kind of prelude, Mirabeau called in the Estates-General on May 5th 1789, just after the thirteenth anniversary of the Illuminati’s founding.

Marx described Mirabeau as the “lion of the revolution”.
At the beginning of the revolution, there were 282 Masonic lodges in France, of which 266 were controlled by the Illuminati, according to Nesta Webster (“World Revolution”, London, 1921, p. 28). It was these same groups which organised all the riots and troubles.

On the 13th of July 1789, at 11 o’clock, the conspirators gathered at the church of Prix Saint-Antoine where they set up a revolutionary committee and discussed how to organise the revolutionary militia. Dufour from the Grand Orient chaired the meeting. Even the fall of the Bastille was planned by these freemasons, according to Gustave Bord’s testimony. (V.
Ivanov, “The Secrets of Freemasonry”, Moscow, 1992, p. 120.)

On the following day, July 14th, people were incited to head for the Bastille fortress with axes in their hands. Contrary to what the Illuminati’s myths say about it, there was no storming and capture of the Bastille. It simply capitulated to the threats of four freemasons. In this way the Bastille was taken. Actually, it was quite meaningless to take the Bastille – the authorities had already decided to demolish it to build a housing area.

Not a single political prisoner was found in the Bastille. There were only seven people incarcerated there. Four of these were infamous frauds and forgers. The young Comte des Solages had been imprisoned at his father’s bidding since he had committed serious offences (incest). Two of the Bastille inmates were mentally ill; one of these was an Irishman with a three foot long beard who claimed to be God himself.

The revolutionaries continued to mislead the people by showing them a printing press, which they claimed, was an instrument of torture. They also asscrted that an old suit of armour had been used as a straitjacket for refractory prisoners.

Actually, the prisoners had had it fairly easy. They had their own
furniture and were allowed to wear their normal clothes. They were also served several courses for dinner. The dungeons had been used to store wine. The warders had been decent, and visits from friends and relatives had frequently been allowed. The library was of a high standard. The daily walks in the little garden of the Bastille had been pleasant.
T
he freemasons, headed by Camille Desmoulins, agitated the people more and more intensively with shouts of “Down with the Bastille!” The tumult cost 83 attackers their lives. Another 73 were injured, of which 15 later died of their injuries (Svenska Dagbladet, 25th June 1989). Earlier, the liberal governor had even invited the freemasons’ messenger to dinner!
He was tortured and killed by the crowd. His head was cut off and carried in triumph on a pole through Paris. Afterwards, three officers were murdered and two invalids were hanged.

The “revolutionaries” waved their red flags. Afterwards, agents of the freemasons were sent out across the country. Their main task was to foster panic simultaneously in most of the provinces. During this summer of famine, they began to spread lies in different cities and villages about the roaming bands of beggars and unemployed, calling them bandits and arsonists who killed women and children. They also lied about an impending attack by the Germans and the English. Within 36 hours these evil rumours had reached the great masses
around the country and created an enormous panic on the 22nd of July.

The leaflets appeared to be official declarations. They would read: “By order of his Majesty, the burning of all castles and the hanging of anyone who opposes this is allowed from the 1st August until the 1st November.”

People were taken in by these lies. The peasants took up arms. They attacked and plundered manors and castles. They burned terriers and other documents and thereby also burned their own history.

Behind the idea of the “Day of Terror” was the freemason Adrien Dupont, who wanted to exploit the people as much as he could for “revoutionary” reasons, according to Nesta Webster (“World Revolution”, London, 1921, pp. 31-32). To speed up their own seizure of power, the freemasons checked any attempted reforms.

The National Assembly was moved into an old manege on the Rue de Rivoli in October 1789. The radicals sat to the left of the chairman, the conservatives to the right. Hence the Illuminati created left and right as ideological concepts in world politics. Everything that had to do with the left was thereafter considered progressive since it was true Illuminism.

The murders began under Rothschild’s red banner and the Illuminist slogans: “Liberty, Equality, Fraternity!” and “Freedom or Death!” In Lyon the “enemies of the people” were shot down with cannons, in Nantes, following the slaughter of 500 children, 144 seamstresses were drowned in old barges on the Loire River. Their “crime”: they had sewn shirts for the army. People were executed without trial, despite the ostensible
introduction of so-called revolutionary tribunals in September 1789. One of the judges presiding at these tribunals was the perverted Marquis Donatien Alphonse Francois de Sade, who had been brought straight from a mental hospital. De Sade was responsible for giving the concept “sadism” a name. He also died in a mental hospital.

The Illuminist coup in France brought none of the improvements that corrupt historians try to make us believe in; instead it resulted in an orgy of violence and intrigue.

To make the killing more efficient, the “revolutionaries” began using the guillotine in April 1792. The idea originally came from Joseph-Ignace Guillotin, a professor in anatomy. The doctor and freemason Antoine Louis constructed the killing machine. The record of Henri Samson, the chief executioner, was 21 heads in 38 minutes. The real reign of terror, however, began on the 10th of August 1792, which was a Yahweh day, when the monarchy was abolished and the Paris commune was established. The commune leadership included 288 Illu-
minati headed by Chaumette, Danton and Robespierre. The leaders of the Jacobins and especially of the Enraged (Les Enrages) wanted to destroy all who had shown any misgivings about the “revolution”. Georges Jacques Danton, infamous as a rogue, became minister of justice. He wanted every
suspect imprisoned. Many priests and relatives of emigrants were also incarcerated. In this way the leaders of the revolution gained access to enormous assets. Danton himself became incredibly rich. Earlier, he had taken large bribes from those wishing to save their lives. In the beginning of September 1792, Danton encouraged the mobs to massacre the “enemies of the people”. In Paris alone, 2800 people were murdered
between the 2nd and 4th of September, according to the historian Nesta Webster. Among the victims of this bloodbath was a friend of the queen, Princess de Lamballe, who was attacked in the street and hacked to pieces.

Every aristocrat was automatically guilty, but only those who
threatened the Jacobins’ position perished. The Jacobins had begun to shut the Masonic lodges – they had played their part. In 1794 there were only 12 lodges left, those most useful to the Illuminati. The king’s cousin, the Duke of Orleans, who had begun to call himself Philippe Egalite (equality)
was also guillotined despite having renounced his title and in 1792 leaving his position as Grand Master of the Grand Orient which he had held for 20 years since the founding of the Order. He knew too much about the preparations for the revolution. He had worked with the Jacobins in the hope that he might be allowed to take the throne as a constitutional monarch.
Philippe Egalite explained why he left the Grand Orient in the
following manner: “…I no longer know who belongs to the Grand Orient. Therefore, I believe that the Republic should no longer allow any secret societies. I no longer want to have anything to do with the Grand Orient and Masonic meetings.” The Illuminati could not forgive this and exacted their revenge upon him, despite the fact that his vote had been decisive in the
process of deposing the king.

Nothing was said about guilty peasants and workers but it was mainly they who suffered from the “revolutionary” punishments. Marat wanted 100 000 people guillotined to scare the enemies of the “revolution”. Saint-Just promised in the name of the republic to eliminate all adversaries. The Jacobins’ (Illuminati’s) terrorism claimed 300 000 human lives, according to Nesta Webster (“World Revolution”, London, 1921, p. 47). The
historian Rene Sedillot, in his book “The Cost of the French Revolution”, calculates that the “revolution”, on account of the terrorism and the civil war, claimed at least 600 000 victims. Charlotte Corday murdered the powerful and bloodthirsty freemason Marat on the 13th of July 1793.

Less than one in ten of those guillotined were aristocrats. This was revealed just before the 200th anniversary of the revolution. This information is based on the protocols of the revolutionary tribunals, which include the names of all those executed. Nine per cent of the decapitated “enemies of the people” were nobles, 28 per cent peasants and 30 per cent
workers. The rest were servants. (Dagens Nyheter, 1st July 1989.) In other words, those killed were quite ordinary people.

In Paris alone, 30 people were executed every day. The Jacobin executioners usually preferred blonde victims.

In 1903, Lenin proclaimed: “A Russian social democrat must be a
Jacobin.”

This was just the beginning. After the “revolution” came the wars. The Jacobins explained in their inflammatory speeches how “a war would be ablessing for the nation. The worst thing that could happen to us now would be if we did not get a war”. On the 20th of April 1792, France declared war on Austria. After that, Belgium, Holland and parts of Germany were invaded. All those wars claimed two million lives. All of France’s 27 million inhabitants were made to suffer from this madness.
With the help of French “revolutionary” troops, the Republic or Commune of Mainz, Germany, was proclaimed on the 18th of March, 1793.

The 18th of March had a special significance for the Illuminist conspirators. On the same day in 1314, the Jewish Grand Master of the Knights Templar, Jacques de Molay, was burned at the stake. Because of this,some of the more important Illuminati actions were planned for just this day, as a kind of revenge for his execution. Revolts were organised to
break out on the 18th of March, 1848, in several European countries. A coup was staged in Paris on this day (1871) after which the Illuminati proclaimed the Paris Commune. Thanks to the efforts of the Prussian army, the snake-pit in Mainz was liquidated only four months later – on the 23rd of July 1793. Goethe accompanied the Prussian army as early as
1792 in its campaign against the “lawless Frenchmen”. (Dagens Nyheter, 4th of February 1989.) On the 17th of January 1795, a revolutionary “sister-state” was founded in the Netherlands – the republic of Batavia, where Amsterdam became the capital. Napoleon oversaw the conversion of this state into the king-
dom of Holland in 1806.

Jewish “revolutionaries” immediately saw to it that the Jews received full citizenship and so that they had their hands free to act. Maximilien Marie Isidore Robespierre (1758-1794) published a work entitled “To Protect the Political Rights of the Jews” as early as in 1789. Protection of Jewish rights was obviously considered the main priority. Louis Joseph Marchand, friend of Napoleon Bonaparte, wrote in 1895 that Robespierre was actually a Jew by the name of Ruban from Alsace (“In Napoleon’s
Shadow,” San Francisco, 1998).

The slogan which best summed up the Jacobins’ aims was: “All power to the bourgeoisie!” (the Illuminati). And the power certainly became centralised in France, according to Leo Gershoy, “The Era of the French Revolution 1789-1799” (New York, 1957, p. 41).

Everything that was non-essential was suddenly presented as essential. However, the Buddhist work Dhammapada (11-12) says of this: Those who take the non-real for the real
and the real for the non-real and thus fall victims to erroneous notions never reach the essence of reality.
Having realised the essential as the essential and the non-essential as the non-essential, they by thus following correct thinking attain the essential.
Illuminist Jews saw to it that everything that was good about France was destroyed during the “revolution”. What was good disappeared at the same rate that the evil grew. The road network was allowed to fall into disrepair, overseas trade ceased almost entirely and it took until 1809 for the industrial production to reach its pre-Revolutionary levels again,
according to the historian Rene Sedillot (“Le cout de la Revolution francaise” / “The Cost of the French Revolution”).

Many villages were razed to the ground, churches and castles were destroyed on purpose. The cultural heritage was ravaged, including medieval buildings. The largest Romanesque architectural structure, the 10th century abbey in Cluny, was
destroyed. Only one tower remains today. Those barbarians even began to tear down the Papal Palace in Avignon. The steeple on the Notre-Dame of Paris was considered offensively tall and was torn down.

At the same time, the “revolutionaries” began to plunder castles of their art treasures. The Jewish writer Anatole France described in his book “The Thirsty Gods” how inspectors with tricolour ribbons around their collars began to turn up at the homes of the wealthy to search for riches.

Delighted foreign art dealers bought sculptures and fragments of frescoes. Load after load of confiscated art collections were shipped over the English Channel. The “revolution” was lucrative for the Illuminati and the speculators. All of this was repeated during and after the so-called Russian revolution. The mighty finance dynasty of the Rothschilds was born out of
the French “revolution”. The Rothschilds are still in control behind the scenes today, especially within the European Union.

The government reached a deficit that made the pre-Revolutionary debts seem quite modest in comparison. The debt equalled 800 tons of gold, or 40 per cent of the total gold production of the world during the entire 18th century.
The real losers in the “revolution” were the Illuminati’s tools – the
simple people. The land rights of the small peasants were taken away. The church charities ceased abruptly and any attempt at improving the conditions for loan-takers was regarded as a conspiracy against the state.
The ranks of derelicts swelled. During Napoleon’s days one in five
Parisians lived by begging.

The myth maintains that this was done to throw off the yoke of tyranny and to protect human rights. In actual fact, the Illuministic reign of terror abolished human rights altogether. It became forbidden for workers to organise and strike for better conditions. This prohibition was legislated on the 14th of June 1791. (Etienne Martin-Saint-Leon, “Les deux C.G.T.,
syndicalisme et communisme”, Paris, 1923, p. 7.)

The theatres were given free rein at the beginning, but later the actors began to be punished for undesirable productions. The Academy of Art was closed and anyone who wanted could call himself an artist. Anyone was allowed to be a doctor and to mix medicines, which had a very negative effect on the state of general health in France – but then, maybe this was the intention?

The 21st of January 1793, the Jewish chief executioner and freemason, Samson, and Samson’s son Henry executed Louis XVI. Samson said: “Louis, son of the holy one, rise up to heaven!” The execution of the king was celebrated every year until Napoleon’s coup in Bruimare (November) 1799. (Dagens Nyheter, 25th January 1989.) Even the word “roi” (king)
was abolished. Marie Antoinette was executed on the 16th of October (Yahweh’s Doomsday) in 1793.

The young Hungarian philosopher Ferenc Feher, Lukacs’s disciple,
living in New York, claimed in 1989 that Louis XVI was judged on
political, not judicial, grounds. Because of this, he ascertained that it was terrorism, not democracy that was introduced. Feher believed that what was built up after the French revolution was simply unfounded lawlessness. (Expressen, 21st of August 1989.) The playwright Eugene Ionesco observed in 1990 that this revolution was a big mistake, which led
to the spread of the most terrible false doctrine in history.

The Illuminati wanted to completely politicise society. This was the job of the “insinuating brothers” under the name of the “Committee of National Security ” with its chief Chauvelin. At the same time, society was being undermined through the secret lodges, which began to prepare a dictatorship and a world revolution, which was intended to utterly overthrow the social order. This world revolution was designed to be
accomplished by a handful of Illuminist conductors. (Svenska Dagbladet, 16th August 1989.) The homosexual Robespierre was publicly regarded as a tyrant or dictator.

The new rulers demanded that the populace address all as “citizens”. The year was to begin upon a new day, the months were renamed, and the week became a 10-day period. An hour consisted of 100 minutes. All these idiocies were abolished by Napoleon in 1806.

The peasants in the Vendee province had had enough of all this
“revolutionary” stupidity: their king had been murdered, schooling had been abolished, their oldest sons had all been enrolled into the army. On the 10th of March 1793, they rebelled. At the beginning they were quite successful but when the Jacobins realised that the populace was beginning
to threaten their position, they imposed their dictatorship, which began on the 31st of May 1793, and lasted until March 1794. The terrorism during that period was the worst yet seen. Virtually rampaging marauders murdered everyone in the province of Vendee. Only 12 000 people in the whole province survived the assaults. One general reported to Paris:
“Vendee has ceased to exist.” Another wrote that his band of army raiders daily managed to kill 2000 people. A new rebellion went on during the years 1794-95. In total, 600000 lives were extinguished in the Vendee province. In their struggle for power, some “revolutionaries” even happened to execute each other. Some leaders, above all those who wanted to limit the
extent of the terrorism, were done away with (Georges Danton, Camille Desmoulins and other Dantonites went to the guillotine on the 5th of April 1794 as “enemies of the people”). This awful end also awaited Robespierre. On the 27th of July 1794, the leader of the Jacobins was arrested together with other leading Communards (his brother Augustin, Saint-Just and Georges Gouthon) and was guillotined without trial. The reign of
terror was over. The directors dissolved the Paris Commune on the 26th of October 1795.

The famous French historian Urbain Gohier revealed in his book “The Old France” (1922) how a certain speech, which Robespierre held for two hours at the convention on the 26th of July 1794, had meant his end. He condemned all the eager foreign agents who tried to direct the development of commerce in France too intensively and demanded that those
agents be rendered harmless. On the following day he was arrested together with his brother, Saint-Just and Georges Gouthon. All of them were executed without trial on the 28th of July. This speech has been left out of the official version of events. Officially, the “revolutionaries” justified their craving for power as “moral”, but the people were forced to
be “virtuous” and to change their minds.

These experiences were exploited later in Russia when the Illuminati, who called themselves Bolsheviks, paid homage to the men responsible for this revolutionary terrorism: a statue of Robespierre (Ruban), whose family had immigrated to France from Ireland, was erected and a massive armoured cruiser (as well as several factories) were given the name Marat
(actually Mosessohn).

What have Jewish ideologues said about this “revolution” in France? Archives Israelites admitted very ambiguously on the 6th of June 1889: “The French Revolution has a very expressive Hebraic character.”
The aim of this new politics, pursued for the people’s (the Illuminati’s) own best, was indubitably totalitarian (Svenska Dagbladet, 14th March 1989). Later, the question arose whether this conspiracy to overthrow the church and the state had begun somewhere in Germany (Svenska Dag-
bladet, 16th august 1989). Other states now sought to defend themselves against Illuminism. The Turks dismissed suggestions from Russia to take a joint action against France.
Gustavus III was also prepared to send 16 000 Swedish soldiers to help forge a European alliance to crush the French Revolution. He banned the Marseillaise in Sweden. Because of this, the earlier decision to murder the king was carried out. On the 16th of March 1792, Gustavus III was fatally wounded at a masked ball by the freemason Jakob Johan Anckarstrom.
The king had been warned about possible assassination attempts but had not taken these warnings seriously. A bust of Anckarstrom stands in the lodge chamber of the Grand Orient in Paris. In 1818 the freemasons put one of their agents from France on the Swedish throne – Jean Baptiste
Bernadotte.

Jimbo, I don´t think Lina mentions Scott´s book; I have it in an electronic version, so I could check it out. But Captain Ramsay to whose book I linked above does mention this strange book, whose fate is a perfect example of Jewish censorship in the old days.

Ramsay summarizes some points of Scott. Carpenter, I appreciate that you have read the material I have recommended. But it was the most uncharitable reading I could imagine. So for those who didn´t bother to read the stuff so far I want to say that the authors are much better than the “summaries” of Carpenter suggest.

Sadly you are right, Final Verdict. Though, we’re talking South French here. There is a difference, even though they are becoming more common.

Sehnsucht, with uncharitable I think you mean I was looking for the same things I’m always looking for, the things that Rockwell and Pierce and Oliver and others have provided in the movements where Jews are involved: names of the major Jews involved, and accounts of what they did.

There is no doubt that Nesta Webster is only talking about the Freemasons. (and again, she even mentions that the lodges in question are perverted, as politics and religion, she writes, were normally forbidden topics in Freemasonry.) She does not say that the Freemasons would be controlled by Jews. She only says that many of their symbols came from the early Cabala, many centuries back, and she speculates in how those symbols could have been imported (like, through the Templars). Not even in regard to the symbols does she speak of any active Jewish involvement, except, possibly she says, a Jewish friend of Cromwell.

You have to agree that this is correct: Nesta Webster speaks of Freemason lodges in the French Revolution, not Jews. On this we can agree, right?

As for the chapter in the book, its proof is that the Protocols of Zion says “we were behind it.” That is no proof, since the Protocols, though mostly insightful about Jewish ways, was written by a Russian. It’s not heresy for me to say so: leading WNs have said the same thing, like Pierce. I thought that point was settled.

If there is anything else in those sources you would like to bring up, do so. If there was Jewish leadership in the French Revolution I want to know. I admit it would give me a sort of satisfaction, knowing that such heinous acts could not have been initiated by Whites acting on their own. Alas, that seems to be the case here though.

I will post tomorrow the reasons which I deem conclusive that the French Revolution was a Jewish production from start to finish.

Regards

follow ‘the money trail’ and find…..guess what?…..a KIKE

re: Sehnsucht nach dem Reich

“During the Russian revolution the trigger event was the shooting at the winter palace. Read what Juri Lina has to say about this event”

it’s a year or so since i read Lina’s book and, as stated previously, my copy is currently on loan. Does this refer to an incident during the actual October 1917/St Petersburg ‘putsch’ or to the (in)famous 1905 ‘massacre’? If i recall Lina correctly, that particular incident involved the Tsar’s ‘palace guard’ returning fire @ Jew snipers ensonced in trees in a near-by park who were shooting not only the few dozen ‘protestors’ but also @ the police and military.

The resulting casualties(wholly and solely attributable to the yoos!) are what constitutes the myth of the 1905 ‘massacre’.

The tragedy is that this Hymie horse-shit is still taught to the yoo-befuddled-goyim of the (je)West and largely believed!

As for the ‘predicted’ third revolution of the yoos: more and more white people are waking up to these goblins because of the internet but will it be enough and will it be soon enough?

One thing i think is for sure, though: the internet was a WILDCARD that the yoos had not foreseen and it has caused them ALL SORTS OF PROBLEMS…hence: their frantic efforts to shut it down/curtail it/censor it/whatever by all sorts of crazy accusations and innuendos.

However, even if it was SHUT DOWN TO-MORROW, there are still MANY MORE WHITE PEOPLE aware of them then, say, even as recently as 20yrs ago….at the VERY LEAST: this may well ‘force’ their hands into acting before they are 100% prepared.

And, of course, that sort of hasty, precipitious action can lead to failure! “the hasty stroke oft goes astray.”

Sehnsucht nach dem Reich: awesome post, BTW!

Gentlemen, your collective erudition is most interesting!
Can anyone shed some light on the suicide, probable murder, of crown prince Rudolf von Habsburg and his mistress at Mayerling near Vienna in 1889.
I suspect another jewish conspiracy is awaiting discovery.

Its kind of old tread but I will post anyway ;)
So much attention to mr Lina so it will me proud to be his countrymen …
And “Sehnsucht nach dem Reich” as made very nice comments and totally
on point – You should concider you own website for this good information.
I just want do add few links I found to add those exellent post here.
GOD speed.

http://judicial-inc.biz/1_master_supreme.htm

http://www.iamthewitness.com/DarylBradfordSmith_Rothschild.htm