Vanguard News Network

Poor old Hephaistos… all there. Our ancestors didn’t transmit it to us for shit and giggles. That’s the problem when jews take over the humanities, our people get mis-directed and they loose the vital importance they hold. Fuck Sun Tzu, read Homer.

This also is sparked by the grassy knoll post and debate going on:

“He said primitive thought used representations containing emotional elements derived from magic and ritual, non-cognative elements, so that representations could not be reduced to homogeneous concepts in a sustained ratiocination. For these reasons – and also because primitive thought lacked ‘the principle of contradiction’ – it could not build deductively. But his whole argument could be reduced to the absence of the principle of contradiction, i.i. the basic rule of Western logic which says ‘It is not true both P true and P false’ – ~(P.~P). Primitives do not have any such orienting conception; they believe it is possible to be two persons or in two places at once, both dead and alive, right and wrong, here and there; and if they believe that they will believe anything. The whole idea is that primitives’ superstitions (and presumably also magic) stem from not having a rule of contradiction.”
— Stolen Lightning, O’ Keefe

and I have a lot more from many different sources but my fingers are tired. :(

Don’t understand what you mean to say there sir. Read Sophocle’s Antigone to see how tragedy is a play on seemingly unresolvable contradiction.

But one of the points being made is the contract is dying as it died for the Romans, so one can be both an American and an Israeli Jew. Where is the contradiction? One can be opposed to the war but support the troops. One can say WTC7 should have never fallen like it did but for all that nothing is amiss. No basis from which to judge. A Somali just of the boat is both a Somali and an American. No contradiction there is there?

“…everyone has an opinion about this event, for in America everyone is entitled to an opinion, and it is certainly useful to have a few when a pollster shows up. But these are opinions of quite a different order from 18th or 19th century opinions. It is probably more accurate to call them emotions rather than opinions, which would account for why they change from week to week, as the pollsters tell us. What is happening here is that television is altering the meaning of “being informed” by creating a species of information that might properly be called disinformation… …It means misleading information – misplaced, irrelevant, fragmented or superficial information – information that creates the illusion of knowing something but which infact leads one away from knowing. In saying this, I do not mean to imply that television news deliberately aims to deprive Americans of a coherent, contextual understanding of their world. I mean to say that when news is packaged as entertainment, that is the inevitable result. And in saying that the television news show entertains but does not inform, I am saying something far more serious than that we are being deprived of authentic information. I am saying we are losing our sense of what it means to be well informed. Ignorance is always correctable. But what shall we do if we take ignorance to be knowledge?

[mentions a news report about how interest has declined amongst the public concerning “misstatements” made by President Reagan]

“But there is a subtler point made here. Many of the President’s “misstatements” fall in the category of contradictions – mutually exclusive assertions that cannot possibly both, in the same context, be true. “In the same context” is the key phrase here, for it is context that defines contradiction. There is no problem in someone’s remarking that he prefers oranges to apples, and also remarking he prefers apples to oranges – not if one statement is made in the context of choosing a wallpaper design and another in the context of selecting fruit for dessert. In such a case, we have statements that are opposites, but not contradictory. But if the statements are made in a single, continuous, and coherent context, then they are contradictions, and cannot both be true. Contradiction in short, requires that statements and events be perceived as interrelated aspects of a continuous and coherent context. Make the context disappear, or fragment it, and contradiction disappears. This point is nowhere made more clear to me than in conferences with my younger students about their writing. “Look here, ” I say. “In this paragraph you have said one thing. And in that you have said the opposite. Which is it to be?” They are polite and wish to please, but they are baffled by the question as I am by the response. “I know,” they will say, “but that is there and this is here”. The difference between us is that I assume “there” and “here”, “now” and “then”, one paragraph and the next to be connected, to be continuous, to part of the same world of coherent thought. That is the way of typographic discourse, and typography is the universe I’m “coming from”, as they say. But they are coming from a different universe of discourse altogether: the “Now…this” world of television. The fundamental assumption of that world is not coherence but discontinuity. And in a world of discontinuity, contradiction is useless as a test of truth or merit, because contradiction does not exist.”
— Neil Postman, Amusing Ourselves to Death

Now stop being so obscure! That is my job.

We can’t speak the truth. We must parrot lies or be fired. This produces double-mindedness, at first, mental veal in the long run, as men cannot act a role without becoming what they pretend. In days, literally days. They’ve done psych tests and proved this.

So, soon enough the college president who must champion opposed goals of quality and diversity in time believes the bs he hears himself spouting.

A society built on this kind of dividedmindness is certainly not going to teach students logic, and since logic only inheres in a minority of white males, and must be taught to the rest of humanity, if it isn’t culturally inculcated it simply does not exist. This is second-stage devolution, and we’re well advanced in it. It’s the stage in which the basic tools of White society are lost: ability to read, to think, to use grammar correctly, to reason.

The dummies have no idea logic and causality even exist. On the high end, men are driven insane. They become neurotic, tortured Aryan Allens from the enforced hypocrisy, or eventually they learn to love Big Brother as lobotomized public relations execs. I’ve been told a Czech wrote a book about these phenomenon in Eastern Europe under last century’s version of Jewish Tyranny.

Alex, so well said.

Being forced to spout a falsehood every day when your other six senses are telling you the exact opposite of what is coming out of your mouth becomes a torturous internal conflict that most of the human race (meaning whites) will solve by surrendering like Orwell’s character does at the end of 1984. Their only option is to fall genuinely in love with Big Brother Kike.

Black people are the victims. They’re oppressed by us. We are genociding them. This is true. Everybody says it is so. It is also true that they have brutally murdered more than 45,000+ whites in the past fifty years and raped more than two million white women. Whites flee them, they don’t flee whites. The two things cannot occupy the same space in your head, they’re like matter and anti-matter. So the only way the poor tormented white middle class slob can resolve this issue and keep his day job paying tribute to ZOG to have his women fucked and strangled is to push the million-man-mosh-bullet-black-teen-facial-choke horror out of his consciousness and into the realm of deep suppressed nightmare rooms in his mind, locked away during waking hours. It pops up at the most inopportune times as an inconvenient latent psychosis, which whitey is prescribed Prozac and Zoloft for to help him keep the shekel revenues rolling in. The white man increases his beer ration and tries to watch enough television to drown his demons until sleep hits him and he can go back in to his meaningless employment.

Someday this secret room in his head is going to blow. The internet is loosening up the hinges as we speak. When that door comes off, it’s going to make an atomic detonation look like a sneeze. Hymie has been nailing that thing around the edges to keep it shut since 1955 or thereabouts and he is just about out of wood screws.

I disagree. Most people have always had to spout lies. Alex pointed out logic was restricted to the very few but not that it is also used and available to everyone everyday. Always has been, always will. See Schop on the subject. Just a tool.

Ask Alex what he thinks of Christianity.

Logic is overrated anyway. Just ask any pessimistic 19th century German philosopher. Most things upon which daily life are orientated are not absolute truths otherwise all cultures would be the same. Context, context, context… But these non-absolute truths should in someway have a consistency that helps those whose “intentionality was not sufficiently organised to control attentionality”. Context. That is the point the guy in the article was making. These deficent in attentionality are prone to 911 different fascinations.

The real interesting thing is when you find someone who has consumed the middle and surpassed it. It all has to do with spirals you see. Round the circle goes, no excluded middle, excluded middle, no excluded middle, excluded middle… but it circles on a spiral climbing higher and higher.

But like I said we are two hundred years behind. I mean what sort of evolutionary environment is in action at the moment? And what is the absolute?

“The Sin was begun in Eternity, and will not rest to Eternity, Till two Eternities meet together. Ah! lost! lost! lost for ever!” said Blake.

I have my own take on things however…

First they came for the stereotype. I said, nothing for I know some blacks who are perfectly upstanding. Then they came for the generalization Itself. I said nothing, for thinking is hard, it’s “above my pay grade.”

Reality and the war against it tend to be indivisible. If you can suppress one aspect, you inevitably push to suppress others, just as the Fed-funded cop lurks in the cold-store aisle at the drug store.

If nobody knows how to generalize, nobody can develop stereotypes. While there may be instinctive reaction to niggers, the marginal white man will lose the ability to connect jewish social policy with spreading-nigger effect, and thereby be undone, as man so community, eventually nation.

Jews are like a track coach setting hurdles in the white man’s lane of the 100-yard-dash finals. Everything that can be done, every pressure that can be leveraged, is used to place obstacles in the way of the average white man’s learning to think logically. Acting on his thoughts in any political, general way has been illegal for decades.

We have to do everything. Logic and emotion. We create new terms. We assume our case more often than we prove it. The proof is there, but really, reality-smacking works better through horselaughing, as Mencken said. Obsession with proving things is conservative and ineffectual. But still, we have fallen to a sad state when the ordinary man cannot grasp that a single anecdote is not enough to disprove a generalization. I maintain that because of our public school system, all too many whites truly do not understand that.

My point is logic is not innate in most people, even in most Whites. It needs to be inculcated through education. People are swayed by what they think others think more than by pure logic.