So Low the Jewed West Has Sunk: LTE “Illegal”
Posted by alex in Australia, free-speech martyrs, jewish hate & hypocrisy, Jewish Tyranny, loxism at 4:55 pm | 
Permanent Link
Telling great truths now illegal
Telling lies about whites required
Here.
Professor Andrew Fraser’s Letter to the Parramatta Sun Unlawful
Andrew Fraser, March 31, 2006
In a stunning blow to freedom of expression in Australia, the President of the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission, Mr John von Doussa, QC, today declared that a letter to the editor written by Associate Professor Andrew Fraser and published in the Parramatta Sun on 6 July 2006 was an unlawful breach of s 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act.
In that letter Professor Fraser observed that “[e]xperience practically everywhere in the world tells us that an expanding black population is a sure-fire recipe for increases in crime, violence and a wide range of other social problems.�
The letter was the subject of a complaint submitted on behalf of Mr Safi Hareer, General Secretary of the Sudanese Darfurian Union, by George Newhouse of Newhouse Lawyers, with the assistance of David D Knoll, President of the NSW Jewish Board of Deputies and Ms Anna Katzmann, SC.
No complaint has been received by the HREOC in relation to the article by the editor of the Parramatta Sun, Charles Boag, also in the July 2006 issue. In that opinion piece, Mr Boag categorically asserted that “the violence in America’s deep south…was caused by whites.� To emphasize his anti-white message, Mr Boag went on to accuse “white settlers� of committing “murder and mayhem on a great scale in Australia.�
Apparently, in contemporary Australia, people of white, European ancestry can be identified routinely as the root of all evil while it is forbidden for whites ever to mention publicly the social pathologies associated with black Africans, even if they are well-known to any informed person and openly acknowledged by reasonable black people themselves.
The President of the HREOC has just endorsed that double standard. Along with his two submissions to the Commission, Professor Fraser provided, inter alia, an article by a black journalist thoroughly disgusted by the behaviour of African-Americans in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans last year. Leighton Levy wrote that “I am beginning to believe that black people, no matter where in the world they are, are cursed with a genetic predisposition to steal, murder, and create mayhem.�
The President of the HREOC also disregarded the rest of the copious evidence provided by Professor Fraser detailing the nature and scope of the crime, violence and other social problems associated not just with the black African diaspora in the West but with the post-colonial societies of sub-Saharan Africa itself.
The upshot of the Human Rights Commission decision is clear. Whenever any person of black African ancestry declares that he has been “offended, insulted, humiliated or intimidated’ by the public mention of such unsavoury truths, the freedom of white Australians to speak openly and freely about black African immigration in particular and non-white immigrants generally will be suppressed.
The Commission has also flatly rejected Professor Fraser’s submission that his Letter was not unlawful because, under s18D of the RDA, it was a “statement, publication, discussion or debate made or held for [a] genuine academic …purpose or any other genuine purpose in the public interest; or…a fair comment on any…matter of public interest if the comment is an expression of genuine belief held by the person making the comment.�
For all practical purposes, the decision of the Commission has rendered nugatory, the assurances of the politicians who assured Australians that the passage of the racial vilification laws would not threaten our historic liberties.
Even before the Commission’s decision, Deakin University had refused to publish a peer-reviewed article by Professor Fraser on the subject of race and immigration while Macquarie University has forbidden him to teach in any subject area.
The freedom of academics to dissent from the official policy of transforming Australia into a colony of the Third World is now officially dead and buried—unless patriotic Australian rally to resist this blatant assault on their ancestral freedoms.
Indeed, on a personal level, the Commission’s decision is more worrying still to Professor Fraser. The Commission’s proposed resolution of this matter echoes the methodology employed during the show trials in Stalinist Russia where defendants were compelled to confess their thought crimes and beg public forgiveness.
Newhouse Lawyers demanded that Professor Fraser “should cause to be published at his expense an advertisement in the Parramatta Sun (of a size no smaller than the Letter and no less prominent) acknowledging that he engaged in unlawful conduct by means of the Letter and Comments, unreservedly apologising for the hurt thereby caused to the Sudanese people who live in the Parramatta-Blacktown area, promising not to repeat such conduct and retracting on the public record all of the imputations.�
Mr von Doussa has invited Professor Fraser to submit to this neo-Stalinist ritual of self-abasement.
Professor Fraser will not accept that invitation. But, in all likelihood, that will not be the end of the matter. It can be assumed that, if this “conciliation� proposal is rejected, Newhouse Lawyers will pursue Professor Fraser into the Federal Court, in an effort to ruin him financially by winning an order of costs against him.
Andrew Fraser
Associate Professor
Department of Public Law
Macquarie University
Sydney, NSW
AUSTRALIA 2109
dfraser@humn.mq.edu.au
31 March, 2006 at 5:03 pm
Here on the jews’ tag-team partners in speech suppression:
Muslim neighbours force censorship on Paris cafe
PARIS, March 31, 2006 (AFP) – A gang of young Muslims wielding iron rods has forced a Paris cafe to censor an exhibition of cartoons ridiculing religion, the owners of the establishment said Friday.
Some 50 drawings by well-known French cartoonists were installed in the Mer à Boire cafe in the working-class Belleville neighbourhood of northeast Paris, as part of an avowedly atheist show entitled ‘Neither god nor god’.
The collection targeted all religions — including Islam — but there were no representations of the prophet Mohammed such as sparked the recent crisis between the West and the Islamic world, according to Marianne who is one of the cafe’s three owners.
“We used to give glasses of water to a group of local boys aged between 10 and 12 who played football across the street. On Tuesday a few came in, flung the water on the ground and accused us of being racists,” said Marianne, who did not wish to give her family name.
“Later more of them came back with sticks and iron rods and tried to smash the pictures. They managed it with a few of them. With the customers we chased them away, but they kept coming back,” she said.
Should this post with a picture of the Prophet Mohammed?
Chirac slams media for Mohammed cartoons
French say Mohammed cartoons ‘unnecessary’
Later the cafe-owners were approached by a group of older youths.
“They said they did not approve of what the youngsters had done. But what we were doing was unacceptable too. They warned us that if we didn’t take down the cartoons they would call in the Muslim Brothers who would burn the cafe down,” said Marianne.
“They kept saying: ‘This is our home. You cannot act like this here,'” she said.
Refusing to dismantle the exhibition, the owners have placed white sheets of paper inscribed with the word ‘censored’ over the cartoons that were targeted by the gang.
“To take down the cartoons would have been a surrender. But on the other hand we cannot expose ourselves to this kind of violence. This way you can still see the pictures if you lift the paper,” said Marianne.
One of the cartoons that aroused the wrath of the youths was a bar scene, in which the barman offers a drink to an obviously inebriated man who says “God is great.” The caption is: “The sixth pillar of Islam. The bar pillar.” In France a “bar pillar” is a barfly or drunk.
The aim of the exhibition was to poke fun at all religions, according to cartoonists who took part.
“Putting on this type of show in this place was not in the least a provocation. Unless you think that freedom of expression in itself is a provocation,” the cartoonist Charb told Le Parisien newspaper.
The Belleville neighbourhood of Paris’s 20th arrondissement is racially mixed, with a large population of north African origin, but Marianne said there were few outward signs of religious extremism.
“There are areas near here which do have a reputation for Islamists. But here it’s different. These are street gangs for whom religion has become a kind of mark of identity,” she said.
The owners of the Mer à Boire, which means “the sea you can drink” and opened in September, have filed suit with the police.
http://www.expatica.com/source/site_article.asp?subchannel_id=25&story_id=28926
31 March, 2006 at 5:11 pm
Borders, Waldenbooks Won’t Carry Magazine
By CAROLYN THOMPSON Associated Press Writer
© 2006 The Associated Press
BUFFALO, N.Y. — Borders and Waldenbooks stores will not stock the April-May issue of Free Inquiry magazine because it contains cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad that provoked deadly protests among Muslims in several countries.
“For us, the safety and security of our customers and employees is a top priority, and we believe that carrying this issue could challenge that priority,” Borders Group Inc. spokeswoman Beth Bingham said Wednesday.
The magazine, published by the Council for Secular Humanism in suburban Amherst, includes four of the drawings that originally appeared in a Danish newspaper in September, including one depicting Muhammad wearing a bomb-shaped turban with a lit fuse.
Islamic tradition bars depiction of Muhammad to prevent idol worship, which is strictly prohibited.
“What is at stake is the precious right of freedom of expression,” said Paul Kurtz, editor-in-chief of Free Inquiry. “Cartoons often provide an important form of political satire … To refuse to distribute a publication because of fear of vigilante violence is to undermine freedom of press _ so vital for our democracy.”
Bingham said the decision was made before the magazine arrived at the company’s stores. Borders Group, based in Ann Arbor, Mich., operates more than 475 Borders and 650 Waldenbooks stores in the United States, though not all regularly carry the magazine.
“We absolutely respect our customers’ right to choose what they wish to read and buy and we support the First Amendment,” Bingham said. “And we absolutely support the rights of Free Inquiry to publish the cartoons. We’ve just chosen not to carry this particular issue in our stores.”
The cartoons, which were reprinted in European and American papers in January and February, sparked a wave of protests around the Islamic world. Protesters were killed in some of the most violent demonstrations and several European embassies were attacked.
___
On the Net:
Free Inquiry: http://www.freeinquiry.net
Borders: http://www.bordersgroupinc.com
31 March, 2006 at 5:14 pm
The way things work in the real world:
Jews infiltrate society, take over its sense organs. Nothing is seen but through jewish lens. They take over the academy. No idea is circulated but what furthers the jewish agenda. Opposing ideas are criminalized.
The Muslim fights back the only way he can, through breeding and violence.
The White man stands bereft. What happened here?
Simple. We forgot who we were, and lost our place to those who know.
Either we take it back, or we disappear into extinction.
Violence, lying, and infiltration are successful routes to power, let the record show. Regardless how you “feel” about them, they work, and they were used not only by jews and muslims to destroy europe and america, but by American revolutionaries liberating themselves from Great Britain.
31 March, 2006 at 6:05 pm
How many Talmuds on the shelf at Borders?
How many books containing criticism of jews – save Mein Kampf with the helpful preface?
31 March, 2006 at 10:53 pm
They are turning Australia into a draconian hellhole which has nothing in common with the past 1200 years of English common law.
The entire government and framework of law was replaced overnight without consulting anybody and a new Talmudic code was put in its place. There was never any referendum. Most of the new thought crime and speech crime legislation was not actually drafted by elected officials.
1 April, 2006 at 7:43 am
It’s crazy shit like this that is needed to give Whitey a boot in the ass.
2 April, 2006 at 6:07 pm
Half of my 52 years of life i wasted in communist (at that time-officialy) pland and the other 26 years in West Germany and Australia(23 years) .
It gives me an opportunity to compare two systems .
Communism was stupid,primitive and brutal.What we getting now is perfidious,doublefaced,muddled,manipulated form about the brutal commies did not even dear to dream about.
In so called “free cuntries” we reach a stage enslavment unheard in recent history.The nazis and commies were trying to enslave you body.The globalomasters want you body,your mind and your soul .Look around you and You will see it:it is Orwelian nightmare in action:freedom is slavery,ignorance is witrue and people like Bush intead in jail or lunatic asylum are presidents of biggest izrael’s franchise.
Remember ;whatever the government and media are saying : 2 +2 = 4.
Jerzy (George)
Sydney
17 April, 2006 at 4:28 pm
It’s very important to always remember and inform others about the problem makers, and they are the criminal Executers-of-the-Talmud.
30 May, 2006 at 3:15 am
What would the defenders of Eureka Stockade think of this latest talmudic tyranny?
The demographic situation in Sydney and Melbourne is becoming dire. What we need is men of guts to speak the truth and defy the jew. Make them fear us.
White pride world wide!
3 March, 2007 at 3:37 pm
Start taking names if you arent already so when the day comes
there will be a database of people to be brought to task for their
communist activities.
A quick and permanent solution will be required to force a resolution
without giving the enemy opportunity to regroup after their most
obvious aggitators are silenced.
The more detailed the information gathered now, the less effort
will be required to identify, find and solve these lesser known
problems in the future.
……………………….