Dispossession
Posted by alex in Dan Roodt, General Decline, Robert Griffin, South Africa at 5:22 pm | 
Permanent Link
Good stuff from the Griffin files (that’s Robert, not the walleyed sellout Nick). Article.
Let’s be clear on something: nostalgia is not the White man’s friend. What is destroyed is done with, it can never be rebuilt. The genius of the White race lies in its intellectual fearlessness. What do we do from the situation we’re in?
The Constitution and American history have nothing to do with what we see before us today, better seen as the start of a new era than the closing of an old. The type that produced the constitution no longer exists. How do we get from where we are to where we need to be? In general terms, there is no way but reorienting our lives around race, and recognizing that we are in a winner-take-all struggle with our only true enemy – the jew.
31 March, 2006 at 5:28 pm
Don’t miss the link to the story of South Africa:
http://www.amren.com/0406issue/0406issue.html#cover
31 March, 2006 at 5:54 pm
how is nick a sellout eazy to slag people off aint it. what part of your life did you give to the white race. nick has given most of his sell out yea right
31 March, 2006 at 6:03 pm
Not only did Nick sell out, he got nothing in return.
31 March, 2006 at 6:10 pm
Alex Linder is a genius and a hero, and an honest man.
As far as nostalgia for the “America of the Founders,” attractive to many with conservative tendencies, including me in the past:
My opinion towards the Founders and Constitution has lately become much more negative. Their attempt to base the U.S. government on purely rational, pseudo-scientific principles was really an utter disaster. While, for some of them at least, their intentions were good, they undertook what was essentially a utopian, idealistic project in attempting to form a limited democratic federal government. The founding documents are rife with “self-evident” principles and devoid of any functional mention of the white race, though race is the only basic and biological organizing fact of politics. However limited the franchise initially was intended to be, white propertied males did not manage to keep that power for themselves. However clever and intricate the mechanisms for balancing power were supposed to be, they were broken by 1861 and utterly demolished by 1933. The encroachments on the Constitution came quickly and powerfully; the formation of parties (not a Constitutional violation, but against the spirit of the thing), Madison vs. Marbury (debatable), the Louisiana purchase, nullification. In 1861, 80 years after the so-noble War of Independence was fought for self-determination, Lincoln and the North raped the South for seeking … self-determination. Power and what Hitler called the hierarchal principle of nature are the forces that move politics in the real world, both in the context of race.
And the other side of the (failed) attempt to diffuse and thus limit power was the diffusion of responsibility. Whose fault are things, anyway? The President? He blames Congress. Congress? How many Senators can you name? An utterly corruptable and manipulable system. I think we would have been better off remaining under a monarchy, or establishing our own.
Real-world practice, as opposed to theory, has shown what would be predicted by biology: a nation is a racial organization. If the white race doesn’t run our nation, the Jewish “race” will.
31 March, 2006 at 6:18 pm
Hmmm, I don’t know if Alex Linder/VNN is genius and hero, but I’m sure he isn’t altogether honest, otherwise I wonder why he keeps erasing so many of my posts placed in the blogs? Apollonian
31 March, 2006 at 6:35 pm
You have no right to post here. You aren’t interested in following the rules, so your posts get deleted.
31 March, 2006 at 6:37 pm
Apollonian wrote: “Hmmm, I don’t know if Alex Linder/VNN is genius and hero, but I’m sure he isn’t altogether honest, otherwise I wonder why he keeps erasing so many of my posts placed in the blogs? Apollonian”
Probably because VNN’s comment area isn’t designed for off-topic essays – essays that often contain non-words like “fm” and “u.” But that’s just a guess.
31 March, 2006 at 6:43 pm
I understand about rights, but why not leave up posts as honest efforts for info of volk, and u can publish ur reasons for off-topicalness for volk’s further info? How do my posts published hurt the volk for info? If I’m wrong it would then be there to see for all, right?
31 March, 2006 at 7:07 pm
You post repetive, boring, monomaniacal screeds. If you think people are reading what you say, I guarantee you 99/100 they’re just like me, their eyes bounce off. Post your essays on your own site. Limit your comments here to a succinct paragraph or two ON TOPIC or they will be deleted.
31 March, 2006 at 7:09 pm
Apollonian wrote: “I understand about rights, but why not leave up posts as honest efforts for info of volk, and u can publish ur reasons for off-topicalness for volk’s further info? How do my posts published hurt the volk for info? If I’m wrong it would then be there to see for all, right?”
Do most people really understand things like “objective heretical subjective hubris?” I don’t.
31 March, 2006 at 8:40 pm
DOWN WITH THE FED.
AND APOLLONIAN.
31 March, 2006 at 9:41 pm
Okay “Outis,” have it ur way: but if u curse Christianity u curse reason and objectivity, and u curse white folk. Thus u do only the work of the Jew. Apollonian
31 March, 2006 at 10:12 pm
Say whatever else you want about Alex, but if you have not figured out yet he is both a genius and a hero, meaning a person who dedicates himself to some greater good that is not his own individually, you shouldn’t be posting here.
Apollonian, you’re an idiot and you waste a lot of bandwidth on this site. I have yet to see a post by you that did not look like something that was automatically generated by a spambot posting links to penis-enlargement pills. Zero semantic content.
1 April, 2006 at 1:01 am
Let’s get back to the topic at hand. I’m intrigued by Alex’s statement:
“The Constitution and American history have nothing to do with what we see before us today, better seen as the start of a new era than the closing of an old.”
However, any radical change of government requires it’s overthrow. We can surmise the past is forever lost and look forward to a new era, perhaps with a new and more safeguarded Constitution, but every transition breeds a period of instabilty and possiblility of miscreant infiltration. The Zionists and freemason know this all too well. All Constitutions are, as George Bush says, “just a piece of paper.” It takes the vigilance of watch tower guards to protect and guard it. For the U.S., because of its geographical location and strength, long term goals were required for its subversion. There is no tumultuous overthrow here. We are witnessing the culmination of these subversive goals today. Whites can do the same thing. It requires an increasing number of White cohesiveness, self-reliance, and a recognition to turn off the jewish propaganda. This nation was created for White Christian people and it can be remade to a new glory.
1 April, 2006 at 3:46 am
Revolution within the form. I’m told that comes from Aristotle, but any intelligent man can see that’s the larger part of the jew’s overthrow. John Flynn (if i recall straight) wrote “The Revolution Was,” saying that the very revolution we’re talking about here passed in the night in the THIRTIES.
The conservatives then awaited the big battle just as racialists today await the big battle. Well, the revolution WAS. The fed was created. The media were taken over. 500 executive agencies sprang up from nothing. There never was a fight at all.
If there’s to be a battle, the losing side must initiate it.
All that is left of the white west is some hundreds of millions of men, most of whom don’t even believe or realize they’re whites. A couple legal forms – 1st and 2nd amendment. And that’s about it.
Freedom of association was given up with very little struggle, save some white citizens councils in the south. With that right went our neighborhoods, and in came the transitional area of getting our ass kicked from one end of the continent to another.
My point is to interpret Today’s Wigger in terms of the men about of whom came the Constitution is pointless.
We must fight for the 1st and Second amemdnents, yes, but more than that, we must fight the jew by naming it and asserting againts jew lies that our race exists and is the most precious thing on earth – which has nothing to do with formal legal battles, is much deeper. The time for worrying aobut the constitution as opposed to specific freedoms we — still — sort-of enjoy is after we win. Then we reground our nation on the rock of biological reality, not the sick romance of the christian church.
Just as there has been technical advance since revolutionary times in transportation and media, most notably, and just as these go a long way to rendering the constitution not so much invalid as much less relevant, so do we know much more about the sets of creatures loosely construed as men. WE KNOW WHAT JEWS ARE, AND THAT THEY ARE HOSTILE-NAY-GENOCIDAL TO OUR KIND. That knowledge will be reflected in our next grounding paper. As always we keep front of mind that paper is not reality and is no better than the men through whom it might take effect, depending on their situation and character.
We may not be as high character as Jefferson, or as intelligent, but we do know more about certain very important things than he did.
1 April, 2006 at 4:11 am
Alex Linder is a genius and a hero, and an honest man.
As far as nostalgia for the “America of the Founders,� attractive to many with conservative tendencies, including me in the past:
My opinion towards the Founders and Constitution has lately become much more negative. Their attempt to base the U.S. government on purely rational, pseudo-scientific principles was really an utter disaster. While, for some of them at least, their intentions were good, they undertook what was essentially a utopian, idealistic project in attempting to form a limited democratic federal government.
Hear, hear!
I thank Pierce and Linder for teaching me how weak principles on paper are, when ignored by men in high positions.
Most people cheer principles only because it is fashionable.
1 April, 2006 at 4:13 am
From the essay about Fairview Village, two parts to ponder:
Before it became illegal, realtors in Fairview Village showed houses only to white families. Although this has been painted as unfair, it reflected the desires of the people who lived there.
….
It saddens me to think that I can no longer live where my mother lives and where I grew up. There would be nothing more rewarding than to have a property like that passed down to me in the condition it was once in. Everywhere my family has lived in, we made improvements, such as putting in a nice garden or gutting the walls and putting in new sheet rock, and improving the drainage. Over decades, these changes add up to significant improvements: a better garden, a vineyard, fruit trees, a nice deck. By staying in one place, your property improves and you improve the community, and you form deep, lasting connections with people. That is the way our ancestors in Europe lived. They were tied to a place. I feel that I am all the time planting and that I am never going to get the harvest; that I am never going to live in a true community.
Have you felt like that?
1 April, 2006 at 4:44 am
Hard to feel that way when the govt can build an insta-slum next door, or decide to double your assessment.
If you can’t segregate your community, you aren’t free.
Segregation is self-defense, a natural right.
To be denied self-defense is tyranny.
We have the duty to overthrow tyrannical government, because government is only justified insofar as it protects the safety and interests of the people.
That’s straight Jefferson, you can’t get more American than that.
1 April, 2006 at 5:58 am
It saddens me to think that I can no longer live where my mother lives and where I grew up. There would be nothing more rewarding than to have a property like that passed down to me in the condition it was once in. Everywhere my family has lived in, we made improvements, such as putting in a nice garden or gutting the walls and putting in new sheet rock, and improving the drainage. Over decades, these changes add up to significant improvements: a better garden, a vineyard, fruit trees, a nice deck. By staying in one place, your property improves and you improve the community, and you form deep, lasting connections with people. That is the way our ancestors in Europe lived. They were tied to a place. I feel that I am all the time planting and that I am never going to get the harvest; that I am never going to live in a true community.
This quote in isolation says so much.
Gentiles have been made in wandering jews.
God’s kosher dick-snippers are allowed to benefit from kin, community and extended bonds, the goy must become an atomic unit that sinks or swims according to market whims and none must ever receive an inheritance.
The whole freaking world has become the jew’s bar mitzvah, organized with the stolen property and wealth they have bilked from the whites, who now must be mere consumer units forbidden of free association. The jews are permitted strength in numbers, each white is now an isolated island unto himself economically, starting from scratch in the jew’s debtor market and doomed to spend out his wretched live paying off mortages for a home he or she will never own.
Most children alive today were never given the choice of living in their parents house, although paid for it became worthless when the yahoodis vaporized the land it sat on by flooding it with biped turds. Whites can own nothing, they are only holding it for the jew.
1 April, 2006 at 7:33 am
If Whites had of had a Racial religion in America and not christianity this mess would not exist. What is worse the jew or high up traitior who allows it to jew on his own people as long as he gets his share of the take.
1 April, 2006 at 9:36 am
The average fellow on the street knows very little about their religion. Christianity, Islam, and even the Judaics are the same. If you included Darwinism as such, the same is true. There are so many layers of lies being preached along with the 24,000 known errors in that Book, one needs to translate it themselves. Too many won’t take the time to do this though, but will take the word of some crafty svengali instead. To knowingly mislead and cause others to stumble is known in the Greek as “pharmakeia.” The 20th Century contained many demiurges that have brought the amen crowd to where it is today. V. S. Herrell transliterated the Christian bible and definitively shows that it is all about race. Don’t believe the universalism Catholics or Protestants preach. The brotherhood of man doctrine is all for bilking us of our hard earned money and appeasing our common misery. Thomas Jefferson recognized his Christian faith was all about race. The founding fathers left a legacy of hundreds of documents proclaiming this nation was created for White Christian people — not negroes, or amerinds, or even khoisans. None of them were given citizenship. Even the Luther Bible, the most popular bible in Germany prior to the end of World War II, translated correctly the unforgivable sin of mongrelizing. Interesting how these proper translations were removed after their defeat. Proper Christianity is all about race and preserving our race. It is a racial religion. The perversion of it is based on different grounds.
1 April, 2006 at 12:46 pm
Harry, Linder/VNN, Et Al., “Protesteth Too Much”
(Apollonian, 1 Apr 06)
Well “Harry Tuttle,” above, I do acknowledge Linder is sometimes genius and hero, yes, and yes, I also acknowledge sometimes I’m idiot too, too much, for which I apologize deep fm the heart of Texas.
Still I think Linder/VNN can and should be criticised if it’s helpful and constructive and motivated for good and info of the white volk.
And “Harry,” u’re too much comrade (as for intensity of ur complaining). I inform the volk, and do it well; I don’t “whine” like Carpenter alleges. What u amount to saying is I do too much negative job, and even “Sulla” indicates I’m perfect gentile accomplice for Jews–that’s where I challenge u so smashingly and frustratingly and why u react so viciously. Linder/VNN gets too much praise fm such as u and “Carpenter”; Linder/VNN actually appreciates my criticism as he knows he can then use it to build his madness futher. Thus, if nothing else, is the patriot art and aesthetic treated positively, for good and info of the volk.
CONCLUSION: Believe me Harry, the volk are interested in what exactly it is u oppose regarding my New Testament (NT) conspiracy-theory-template, u protest too much. Reality is either-or, which Linder/VNN admits at least for certain aspect, as for his undistilled antisemitism. But we don’t want to lose sight of the gentile accomplices and co-conspirators, this built upon subjectivism, narcissism, collectivism, hystericism, etc. Thus we really do need and can use Constantinian Christian cultural revolution for positive liberation of white volk. Honest elections and death to the Fed. Apollonian
1 April, 2006 at 2:19 pm
“I also acknowledge sometimes I’m idiot too, too much, for which I apologize deep fm the heart of Texas.”
This is supposed to be the contrite head-hanging of a poor, self-learned southern boy. Forgive me for mah sins Loh-erd, ah’m jes’ a po’ combat scholar. Ho-sannah.
The only template that fits here, right on Apoll’s square Texan forehead, is somewhere deep in the DSM, probably under “M” for MONOFUCKINMANIA.
1 April, 2006 at 2:35 pm
Presumption, built upon presumption, as usual fm “Outis,” so desperate to discredit and intimidate, like Jew, Christian soldier-theologian, our noble subject, Apollonian. “Outis,” u protest so desperately. But the real question is, what is ur info or advice for the volk? Tell me, is reality either-or, and can Christian aesthetic fit-work for such reality? Take ur time comrade. A.
1 April, 2006 at 3:52 pm
My advice for the volk is to die a speedy death, or start shooting at Jews. Either/or, hoss. Ita missa est.
1 April, 2006 at 4:04 pm
Antisemitic Strategic Analytic Demonstrated
(Apollonian, 1 Apr 06)
Okay good, now question is how do we begin to “shoot at Jews”? And I submit we militarily-politically remove the Fed counterfeiting fraud, their foremost weapon, actually, this coming about by specific political means, the political means then treated by means of culture-psychology-rhetoric, appealing to the mentality of the folk by means of aesthetics, hence Christianity, rationality indicating then antisemitism as proper and true essence of Christianity–indeed, antisemitism as necessary consquence of Aryan-white-Western REASON itself, Christianity again merely aesthetic therewith.
CONCLUSION: So “Outis” u endorse proper Christian aesthetic, hence reason and objectivity, hence determinism, yes? And by this theologic foundation we can then begin to treat such as the “Judeo-Christian” (JC) heretics among the gentiles, so destructively stupid if not outrightly traitors, eh? Thanks for ur attn. A.
1 April, 2006 at 4:27 pm
Alex,
I see you’re restricting Appy. Thank the Gods! That being said, can he be altogether purged for the sake of sanity? Like you say, his drivel just makes one’s eyes bounce off the screen and it is a waste of time and space. The guy is obviously a few candles short of a menorah.
1 April, 2006 at 5:14 pm
“[F]ew candles short of a menorah”?–very clever. Note editor will take note of my substance and honest argumentation (however affected) VERSUS SUCH AS U, “SULLA,” WITH CONSTANT question-begging (assertion-without-substantiation) and other Judaically-styled nonsense based upon crass fallacies (like equivocation by which u are so confused regarding Christianity). For what is delusion and madness founded upon, dear “Sulla,” than constant fallaciousness as urs, a delusion which become burnt upon the brain cells, evidently, and which delusionism now is no longer controllable by the poor victim-subject? Tell us more, do. Apollonian
1 April, 2006 at 8:46 pm
Regarding the failure of the Constitution:
We must not forget that the Constitution’s principal purpose is limiting the power of government. Are we so naive we think that if we could only purge Jews from our existence we would not have any other problems? I’m afraid that those who did the purging might just continue to purge some of the rest of us for any (or no) reason.
Think of the Constitution as a first draft. It was defeated by circumstances the Founders could not be expected to foresee. So, we take what worked and improve or strengthen what didn’t.
My own choice for a new amendment: no expenditure of taxpayer funds for charity. Period. In any form whatsoever.
1 April, 2006 at 8:58 pm
“Alex Linder is a genius and a hero, and an honest man.”
I agree. However-
If a WN someone managed to get a job in the mainstream media, he could only earn Alex’s respect by saying things that would get him kicked off the air in five minutes. If his startegy was to introduce things slowly while building an audience and credibility, thereby sticking around long enough to actually make a difference, he would, I’m afraid, receive nothing from Alex but disgust and enmity.
And I think that makes our struggle that much tougher.
2 April, 2006 at 1:56 am
We must not forget that the Constitution’s principal purpose is limiting the power of government.
Why are you telling us this, we have no power yet?. Tell Bush. Tell the jews on the supreme court. Tell lincoln’s ghost. Tell the congress that hasn’t he courage to declare war.
1) The fact that something is written down means next to nothing. Pieces of paper can’t enforce laws. Only men can. If they men are indisposed, the constitution, or any document, is so much wallpaper. Do you understand that? Far too many people cannot grasp that fairly simply concept. You can assert your rights, or demand the powers that be stick to the limits as written, but unless someone ENFORCES it, it’s just some used paper.
ANother way of putting it – the constitution hasnt been changed in decades. So all the power-limits you love are still there. But the powers that be — supreme court, congress, president, simply choose to ignore them. So again, the constitution must take effect, can only take effect, through men disposed to respect and enforce it.
THOSE MEN NO LONGER EXIST IN THE CORRIDORS OF POWER AND HAVENT FOR AT LEAST 150 YEARS.
The civil war, if nothing else, settled that you can do whatever is expedient and no one will stop you. If you can’t enforce your rights, you’re foolish to talk about them and had better use your time getting power. That’s where the biological knowlege of the jew comes in. Unlike fellow Aryans, the jew can’t be brougth to his senses. His whole game is crushing us while hiding inside our accustomed forms. he will never play by our rules because our rules are for us! They’re not universal. he plays by the rules that guarantee his victory, and we must do the same – with regard to the jew. We can worry later about refining our codes for ourselves.
The key is here twofold: one, paper can’t enforce law, only men can do that. Two, you’re mixing politics with biology. We are in a racial struggle, not a court case, or a fashion show, or referreed politeness contest. When you use conservative language, you mislead people as to the parties, the nature of the contest, and the meaning of the outcome. It’s not losing an election, or a bit of graft and excess, it’s Whites going extinct because unnamed jews are holding our arms and legs so niggers can rape us and slit our throats. There’s no nice way to put that. Fox news isn’t going to hire jew-exculpating jared taylor, let alone anyone who even hints that jews are the problem.